Портал психологических изданий PsyJournals.ru
ОТКРЫТЫЙ ДОСТУП К НАУЧНЫМ ИЗДАНИЯМ 
Каталог изданий 80Рубрики 51Авторы 6876Ключевые слова 16201 АвторамИздателямRSS RSS
РИНЦ ВИНИТИ EBSCO DOAJ
CrossRef

Аутизм и нарушения развития

Издатель: Московский государственный психолого-педагогический университет

ISSN (печатная версия): 1994-1617

ISSN (online): 2413-4317

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17759/autdd

Издается с 2003 года

Периодичность: 4 номера в год

Язык журнала: Русский

Доступ к электронным архивам: открытый

 

Современное состояние поведенческих вмешательств при аутизме и нарушениях развития * 387

Казари К., международный эксперт в области программ раннего вмешательства для детей с РАС, Калифорнийский университет, Лос-Анджелес, США, kasari@gseis.ucla.edu

Аннотация

Значительное увеличение количества тщательно организованных и проведенных в условиях реальной жизни исследований различных вмешательств, направленных на ключевые дефициты, служит хорошим предзнаменованием для широкого распространения и применения их на местах даже людьми, не являющимися специалистами. Пи¬лотные исследования, а также исследования, проведенные без использования контрольных групп, посвященные вопросам профилактики, предполагают дальнейшую тщательную проверку, прежде чем смогут быть сделаны ка¬кие-либо заключения.

Ключевые слова: расстройства аутистического спектра, поведенческие вмешательства, расстройства развития

Рубрика: Научные исследования

* Перевод с английского Е.Ф. Шведовского Научные редакторы русского перевода: Морозова Т.Ю., Довбня С.В.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17759/autdd.2016140409

Ссылка для цитирования

Литература
  1. Kaplan ., McCracken J.T. Psychopharmacology of autism spectrum disorders. Pediatr Clin North Am 2012; 59:175—187.
  2. Fletcher-Watson S., McConnell F., Manola E., et al. Interventions based on the Theory of Mind cognitive model for autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2014; 3:CD008785.
  3. Oono I.P, Honey E. Autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2013; 4:CD009774.
  4. Reichow B., Steiner A.M., Volkmar F. Social skills groups for people aged 6 to 21 with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2012; 7:CD008511.
  5. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2013). The Digest of Education Statistics, 2012 (NCES 2014-015). Table 50.
  6. Tager-Flusberg H., Kasari C. Minimally verbal school-age children with autism: the neglected end of the spectrum. Autism Res 2013; 6:468—478.
  7. Fein D., Barton M., Eigsti I.M., et al. Optimal outcome in individuals with a history of autism. J Child Psychol. Psychiatry, 2013; 54:195—205.
  8. Rogers S.J., Vismara L., Wagner A.L., McCormick C., et al. Autism treatment in the first year of life: a pilot study of infant start, a parent-implemented intervention for symptomatic infants. J Autism Dev. Disorder, 2014; 44: 2981—2995. Case controlled study of seven 10—12-month-old infants at risk for ASD with suggestion that early parent-mediated intervention can prevent the development of ASD at age 3 years.
  9. Kasari C., Smith T. Interventions in schools for children with autism spectrum disorder: methods and recommendations. Autism 2013; 17:254—267.
  10. Lovaas O.I. Behavioral treatment and normal educational and intellectual functioning in young autistic children. J Consult Clin Psychol 1987; 55: 3—9.
  11. Smith T., Green A., Wynn J. Randomized trial of intensive early intervention for children with pervasive developmental disorder. Am J Ment Retard 2000; 105:269—285.
  12. Buescher A.V., Cidav Z., Knapp M., Mandell D.S. Costs of autism spectrum disorders in the United Kingdom and the United States. JAMA Pediatr 2014; 168:721—728.
  13. Lavelle T.A., Weinstein M.C., Newhouse J.P., Munir K., et al. Economic burden of childhood autism spectrum disorders. Pediatrics 2014; 133:e520—e529.
  14. Fey M.E., Yoder P.J., Warren S.F., Bredin-Oja S. Is more better? Milieu communication teaching in toddlers with intellectual disabilities. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2013; 56:679—693.
  15. Yoder P.J., Woynaroski T., Fey M., Warren S. Effects of dose frequency of early communication intervention in young children with and without Down syndrome. Am J Intell Dev. Disab., 2014; 119:17—32. Reanalysis of primary study demonstrates that dose appears more important for improving vocabulary growth in children with Down syndrome than children with general intellectual disabilities.
  16. Hauser C.T., Kover S.T., Abbeduto L. Maternal well being and child behavior in families with fragile X syndrome. Res. Dev. Disabil., 2014; 35:2477—2486.
  17. Hustyi K.M., Hall S.S., Jo B., et al. Longitudinal trajectories of aberrant behavior in fragile x syndrome. Res. Dev. Disabil, 2014; 35:2691—2701.
  18. Klusek J., Martin G.E., Losh M.A. Comparison of pragmatic language in boys with autism and fragile X syndrome. J Speech Lang. Hear. Res., 2014; 57: 1692—1707.
  19. Anderson D.K., Liang J.W., Lord C. Predicting young adult outcome among more and less cognitively able individuals with autism spectrum disorders. J Child. Pscychol. Psychiatry, 2014; 55:485—494.
  20. Sigman M., Ruskin E. Continuity and change in the social competence of children with autism, Down syndrome, and developmental delays. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev 1999; 64:1—114.
  21. Weisz J.R., Chorpita B.F., Palinkas L.A., Schoenwald S.K., et al. Testing standard and modular designs for psychotherapy treating depression, anxiety, and conduct problems in youth: a randomized effectiveness trial. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry, 2012; 69:274—282. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.147.
  22. Chorpita B.F., Weisz J.R., Daleiden E.L., Schoenwald S.K., et al. Long-term outcomes for the Child STEPs randomized effectiveness trial: a comparison of modular and standard treatment designs with usual care. J Consult Clin Psychol 201; 81:999—1009. doi: 10.1037/a0034200.
  23. Kasari C., Lawton K., ShihW., Barker T.V., et al. Caregiver-mediated intervention for low-resourced preschoolers with autism: an RCT 2014. Pediatrics ; 134: e72—e79. Randomized trial comparing two parent focused interventions found parent coaching needed to improve core deficits of social communication in low-resourced preschoolers with ASD.
  24. Chambless D.L., Hollon S.D. Defining empirically supported therapies. J Consult. Clin. Psychol., 1988; 66:7—18.
  25. Kasari C., Freeman S., Paparella T. Joint attention and symbolic play in young children with autism: a randomized controlled intervention study. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2006; 47:611—620.
  26. Kasari C., Gulsrud A.C., Wong C., et al. A randomized controlled caregiver mediated joint engagement intervention for toddlers with autism. J Autism Dev. Disord., 2010; 40:1045—1056.
  27. Kasari C., Kaiser A., Goods K., et al. Communication interventions for minimally verbal children with autism: a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial. J Am. Acad. Child. Adolesc. Psychiatry, 2014; 53:635—646.
  28. Wetherby A., Guthrie W., Woods J., et al. Parent-implemented social intervention for toddlers with autism: an RCT. Pediatrics 2014; 134:1—10. Randomized trial of two parent involved interventions for toddlers with ASD found significant benefit of parent coaching in the home on child social communication outcomes and receptive language.
  29. Siller M., Hutman T., Sigman M. A parent mediated intervention to increase responsive parental behaviors and child communication in children with ASD: a randomized clinical trial. J Autism Dev. Disord., 2013; 43:540—555. doi: 10.1007/s10803-012-1584-y.
  30. Kasari C., Siller M., Huynh L.N., et al. Randomized controlled trial of parental responsiveness intervention for tod­dlers at high risk for autism. Infant Behav Dev 2014; 37:711—721. Randomized trial of parent education model for at risk for ASD toddlers found significant short-term gain in parent responsiveness but no measurable effect on child outcome.
  31. Solomon R.1., Van Egeren L.A., Mahoney G., et al. PLAY Project Home Consultation intervention program for young children with autism spectrum disorders: a randomized controlled trial. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2014; 35:475- 485. Randomized trial of relationship based parent—child intervention used a consultation model over one year with significant benefit in parent responsiveness and child initiations in interaction with parents.
  32. Harden A.Y., Gengoux G.W., Berquist K.L., Libove R.A., et al. A randomized controlled trial of Pivotal Response Treatment Group for parents of children with autism. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2014; DOI: 10.1111/ jcpp.12354. Randomized group delivered model of Pivotal Response Treatment superior in child prompted language outcomes compared to group model focused on general ASD information.
  33. Paul R., Campbell D., Gilbert K., Tsiouri I. Comparing spoken language treatments for preschoolers with autism spectrum disorder. J Autism Dev. Disord., 2014. doi: 10.1007/s10803-012-1583-z. Small randomized trial compar­ing two communication interventions with minimally verbal preschoolers, no significant treatment differences.
  34. Schreibman L., Stahmer A. A randomized trial comparison of the effects of verbal and pictorial naturalistic commu­nication strategies on spoken language for young children with autism. J Autism Dev Disord 2014; 44:1244-1251. doi:10.1007/s10803-013-1972-y. Small randomized trial comparing pictorial communication treatment to pivotal response treatment did not yield treatment differences for minimally verbal preschoolers.
  35. Harrop C., Shire S., Gulsrud A., Chang Y.C., et al. Does gender influence core deficits in ASD? An investigation into social-communication and play of girls and boys with ASD. J Autism Dev. Disord., 2014.
  36. Frazier T.W., Georgiades S., Bishop S.L., Hardan A.Y. Behavioral and cognitive characteristics of females and males with autism in the Simons Simplex Collection. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2014; 53:329—340.
  37. Head A.M., McGillivray J.A., Stokes M.A. Gender differences in emotionality and sociability in children with au­tism spectrum disorders. Mol Autism 2014; 5:19. doi: 10.1186/2040-2392-5-19.
  38. Dean M., Kasari C., Shih W., Frankel F., et al. The peer relationships of girls with ASD at school: comparison to boys and girls with and without ASD. J Child Psychol. Psychiatry ; 55:1218—1225.
  39. Ranson N.J., Byrne M.K. Promoting peer acceptance of females with higherfunctioning autism in a mainstream education setting: a replication and extension of the effects of an autism antistigma program. J Autism Dev. Dis­ord. 2014; 44:2778—2796. Randomized trial of peer acceptance intervention for girls with and without ASD at school yielded greater acceptance but not necessarily generalization to other contexts.
  40. ShihW., Patterson S., Kasari C. Developing an adaptive treatment strategy for peer-related social skills for children with autism spectrum disorders. J Clin. Child. Adolesc. Psychol., 2014; DOI: 10.1080/15374416.2014.915549.
  41. Kaale A., Fagerland M.W., Martinsen E.W., Smith L. Preschool-based social communication treatment for children with autism: 12-month follow-up of a randomized trial. J Assoc. Am. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry., 2014; 53:188— 198. Follow-up to randomized trial of teacher-implemented joint attention intervention yielded significant main­tenance of child outcomes.
  42. Kretzmann M., Shih W., Kasari C. Improving peer engagement on the school playground: a randomized controlled trial. Behav Ther 2015; 46:20—28. Small randomized trial of recess intervention successfully trained paraprofes­sionals on the playground to engage children with ASD, and children with ASD demonstrated generalized en­gagement with peers.
  43. Ventola P.1., Yang D.Y., Friedman H.E., Oosting D., et al. Heterogeneity of neural mechanisms of response to pivotal response treatment. Brain Imaging Behav 2014; DOI 10.1007/s11682-014-9331-y. Prepost fMRI of biological mo­tion paradigm of 10 children who received 16 weeks of Pivotal Response Treatment with apparent brain changes; unclear conclusions given no control group, or rigorous design.
Статьи по теме:
 
Webometrics
О проекте PsyJournals.ruЛауреат XIV национального психологического конкурса «Золотая Психея» по итогам 2012 года

© 1997–2017 Портал психологических изданий PsyJournals.ru  Все права защищены

Свидетельство регистрации СМИ Эл № ФС77-66447 от 14 июля 2016 г.

Издатель: ФГБОУ ВО МГППУ

Лауреат XIV национального психологического конкурса «Золотая Психея» по итогам 2012 года

RSS-анонсы журналов Psyjournals на facebook Группа Psyjournals Вконтакте Twitter Psyjournals
Яндекс цитирования Яндекс.Метрика