Russian Psychological Issues PsyJournals.ru
OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS
JournalsTopicsAuthorsEditor's Choice About PsyJournals.ruContact Us

  Previous issue (2017. Vol. 10, no. 4)

Web of Science EBSCO Academic Search International database Ulrich’s Periodicals Directory DOAJ ERIH PLUS Higher Attestation Commission Russian Science Citation Index VINITI Database RAS
CrossRef

Experimental Psychology (Russia)

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

ISSN (printed version): 2072-7593

ISSN (online): 2311-7036

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17759/exppsy

Started in 2008

Published quarterly

Free of fees
Open Access Journal

 

A comparative analysis of perception of the physical characteristics of body in snakes lampropeltis triangulum cambell and elaphe radiata

Khvatov I.A., Ph.D. in Psychology, Associate Professor, Department of General Psychology and History of Psychology, Moscow University for the Humanities, Moscow, Russia, ittkrot@mail.ru
Sokolov A.Yu., Ph.D. in Biology, Senior Researcher, ANO Living Earth Laboratory and Studio, Moscow Institute of psychoanalysis, Moscow, Russia, apophis-king@mail.ru
Kharitonov A.N., Ph.D. in Psychology, Senior Research Associate, Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leading Researcher, MSUPE, Moscow, Russia, ankhome47@list.ru
Abstract
Perception of physical characteristics of the body is a major component of the body schema in animals. The experimental studies of the perception of body limits were conducted on two species of colubridae snakes: Lampropeltis triangulum campbelli and Elaphe radiata. The experimental setup provided that the animals take into account the enlarged limits of their bodies while finding way through the holes of different sizes. Both species demonstrated the ability to take into account both natural and enlarged limits of the body. However, only the Elaphe radiata were able to transfer previously formed skills to take into account the body limits to new experimental conditions thus demonstrating greater lability of the organization of mental representation of the body in comparison with Lampropeltis triangulum campbelli.

Keywords: self-reflexion, body schema, snakes, arthropods, rats, phylogenesis of mind

Column: Comparative Psychology

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2017100309

For Reference

References
  1. Barabanschikov V.A. Vospriyatie i sobytie [Perception and Event]. SPb., Aleteiya Publ., 2002 (In Russian).
  2. Bekoff M. Observations of scent-marking and discriminating self from others by a domestic dog (Canis familiaris): tales of displaced yellow snow. Behavioural Processes, 2001, vol. 55, no 2, pp. 75—79.
  3. Cammaerts M.-C., Cammaerts R. Are ants (hymenoptera, formicidae) capable of self recognition? Journal of Science, 2015, vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 521—532.
  4. Gallagher S., Cole J. Body Schema and Body Image in a Deafferented Subject. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 1995, vol. 16, pp. 369—390. doi: 10.1068/p7027
  5. Gallup G., Jr. Chimpanzees: Self recognition. Science, 1970, vol. 167, no. 3914. P. 86—87.
  6. Garbarinia F., Fossataroa C., Bertia A., Gindria P., Romanod D., Piaa L., Gattaf F. Maravitad A. Neppi- Modona M. When your arm becomes mine: Pathological embodiment of alien limbs using tools modulates own body representation. Neuropsychologia, 2015, no. 70, pp. 402—413. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.11.008
  7. Giglia G., Pia L., Folegatti A., Puma P., Fierro B., Cosentino G., Berti A., Brighina F. Far Space Remapping by Tool Use: A rTMS Study Over the Right Posterior Parietal Cortex. Brain Stimulation, 2015, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 795—800. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2015.01.412
  8. Head H., Holmes G. Sensory disturbances from cerebral lesions. Brain, 1911, vol. 34, no. 2—3, p. 102. doi:10.1093/brain/34.2-3.102
  9. Herman L.M., Matus D.S., Herman E.Y.K., Ivancic M., Pack A.A. The bottlenosed dolphin’s (Tursiops truncatus) understanding of gestures as symbolic representations of its body parts. Animal Learning &Behavior, 2001, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 250—264.
  10. Johnson-Frey S. The neural bases of complex tool use in humans. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2004, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 71—78. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.12.002
  11. Khvatov I.A. Evolyutsiya samootrazheniya zhivotnykh i cheloveka v kontekste differentsionno- integratsionnogo podkhoda [Evolution of self-reflection in animals and humans in the context of differentiation-integration approach]. In N.I. Chuprikova, E.V. Volkova (eds.), Differentsionno- integratsionnaya teoriya razvitiya. Kn. 2. [Differentiation-Integration Theory of Development. Book 2]. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskikh kul’tur Publ., 2014, pp. 343—360 (In Russian).
  12. Khvatov I.A. Glavnye napravleniya evolyutsii psikhiki v kontekste ontologicheskogo i differentsionno-integratsionnogo podkhodov. Chast’ 2 [Main directions of evolution of mind in the context of the differentiation-integration approach/ Part 2]. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya [Psychological Studies], 2012, no. 2 (22), p. 12. URL: http://psystudy.ru/index.php/num/2012n2-22/648-khvatov22.html. doi: 0421200116/0024 (In Russian).
  13. Khvatov I.A. Spetsifika samootrazheniya u vida Periplaneta americana [Peculiarities of self-reflection in Periplaneta anericana cockroaches]. Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya [Experimental Psychology (Russia)], 2011, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 28—39 (In Russian; abstr. in Engl.).
  14. Khvatov I.A., Kharitonov A.N. Spetsifika samootrazheniya u vida Achatina fulica [Specifics of self-reflection in Achatina fulica]. Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya [Experimental Psychology (Russia)], 2012, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 96—107 (In Russian; abstr. in Engl.).
  15. Khvatov I.A., Sokolov A.Yu., Kharitonov A.N. Modifying body schemata in skinks Tiliqua gigas. Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya [Experimental Psychology (Russia)], 2016, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 54—71. doi:10.17759/exppsy.2016090305. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)
  16. Khvatov I.A., Sokolov A.Yu., Kharitonov A.N. Вody schemata in snakes Lampropeltis triangulum campbelli. Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya [Experimental Psychology (Russia)], 2015, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 119—138. doi:10.17759/exppsy.2015080209. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)
  17. Khvatov I.A., SokolovA.Yu., Kharitonov A.N., Kulichenkova K.N. Body scheme in rats Rattus norvegicus. Eksperimental’naya psihologiya [Experimental Psychology (Russia)], 2016, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 112—130. doi:10.17759/exppsy.2016090109. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)
  18. Kohler W. Issledovanie intellekta chelovekoobraznykh obez’yan [A Study of Intelligence of Apes]. Moscow, Izd-vo Komakademii Publ., 1930 (In Russian).
  19. Maravita A., Iriki A. Tools for the body (schema). Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2004,vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 79— 86.
  20. Moeller B., Zoppke H. Frings C. What a car does to your perception: Distance evaluations differ from within and outside of a car. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2016, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 781—788. doi: 10.3758/ s13423-015-0954-9
  21. Stolin V.V. Samosoznanie lichnosti [Self-Conscience of Person], Moscow, Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo Universiteta Publ., 1983 (In Russian).
  22. Tkhostov A.Sh. Psikhologiya telesnosti [Psychology of Body]. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2002 (In Russian).
comments powered by Disqus
 
About PsyJournals.ruLaureate of the XIV National psychological contest «Golden Psyche» at the results of 2012

© 1997–2018 Portal of Russian Psychological Publications. All rights reserved

PsyJournals.ru in Russian

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Catalogue of academic journals in psychology & education MSUPE NEW!

RSS Psyjournals at facebook Psyjournals at Twitter Psyjournals at Youtube Яндекс.Метрика