Previous issue (2019. Vol. 12, no. 1)
Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)
Perceptual trust and accuracy evaluation of the personal characteristics in various conditions of perception 933
, PhD in Psychology, Candidate of Psychological Sciences, Senior research associate, Institute of Experimental Psychology, MSUPE, Moscow, Russia, email@example.comDemidov A.A.
, PhD in Psychology, Senior researcher associate, Institute of experimental psychology, msupe, Moscow, Russia, firstname.lastname@example.org
This article presents the results of the study of perceptual trust and the accuracy of the assessment of psychological characteristics of the person in various conditions of perception. The study involved 96 people. As the conditions of perception were made by the following parameters: a video interview with the voice, video interviews without a voice, photographic image of a person and audio recording of the interview. In the study of psychological characteristics of the person used a variety of scales, components of perceptual trust and two methods: “Personal differential” and a “16-factor personality Express-questionnaire R.B. Cattell”. The results of the empirical research established that the perceptual rating of perceptual trust and psychological characteristics of the person varies depending on the perceptual conditions. Demonstration video with voice or without voice is more trustworthy than demonstrating images of face or listening audio recordings of interviews. Evaluation of perceptual trust in photographic images of face and voice did not differ from each other. The greatest number of accuracy assessments of psychological characteristics obtained in the condition of perception of a video interview without voice and audio interviews, the fewest in the photographic image of the face.
Ambady N., Rosenthal R. Thin slices of expressive behavior
as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. Psychological
Bulletin, 1992, vol. 111, no. 2, pp. 256—274.
Ambady N., Bernieri F.J., & Richeson J.A. Toward a
histology of social behavior: Judgmental accuracy from thin slices of the
behavioral stream. In M.P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social
Psychology, 32 San Diego, CA, Academic Press, 2000. pp. 201—272.
Barabanstchikov V.A. Vospriyatie vyrazheniy litsa
[Perception of facial expressions]. Moscow, IP RAS, 2009. 448 p.
Berry J.W. Psychology of acculturation. In Berman, John J.
(Ed) Current theory and research in motivation. Lincoln, NE, University
of Nebraska Press, 1990, pp. 201—234.
Bruce V, Young A. Understanding face recognition.
British journal of psychology, 1986, vol. 77, pp. 305— 327.
Demidov A.A. Otsenka individualnj-psihologitcheskich
osobennostey cheloveka po vyrazheniyu ego litsa v razlitchnyh situatsiyah
vospriyatia: diss. … [Evaluation of individual psychological
characteristic of a person via facial perceptions. PhD thesis].
Moscow, IP RAS, 2009.
Diveev D.A., Demidov A.A. Microdinamika pertseptivnogo
doveriya pri vospriyatii vyrazheniy litsa. Eksperimental’naya psychologiya
[Experimental Psychology], 2015, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 102—119.
Funder D.C. Errors and mistakes: Evaluating the accuracy
of social judgment. Psychological bulletin, 1987, vol.101, no.1, pp.
Hassin R., Trope Y. Facing faces: studies on the cognitive
aspects of physiognomy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
2000, vol. 78, no. 5, pp. 837—852.
Hess, U., Kappas, A., Scherer, K.R. Multichannel
Communication of Emotion: Synthetic Signal Production. In Scherer, K.R., ed.
Facets of Emotion: Recent Research. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, 1988. pp.
Kappas, A., Hess, U., Scherer, K.R. Voice and Emotion. In
Feldman, R.S., Rim´e, B., eds. Fundamentals of Nonverbal Behavior.
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991. pp. 200 — 238.
Labunskaya V.A. Ekspressiya cheloveka: obstchenie i
mezlichnostnoe poznanie [Human expressions: Communication and interpersonal
cognition]. Rostov-na-Donu, Phenix, 1999. 608 p.
McGurk H., MacDonald J. Hearing lips and seeing voices.
Nature, 1976, vol. 264, pp. 746—748.
Morozov V.P. Neverbal’naya communicatsiya v sisteme
rechevogo obstcheniya. Psichophiziologicheskie b psichoakusticheskie osnovy
[Non-verbal communication in a system of language communication.
Psychological and psycho acoustic basics]. Moscow, IP RAS. 1998.
Oosterhof N.N., Todorov A. The Functional Basis of Face
Evaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United
States of America, 2008, 105.
Scherer K.R. What are emotions? And how can they be
measured? Social Science Information, 2005, vol. 44, no. 4, pp.
Todorov A. Evaluating faces on trustworthiness: an
extension of systems for recognition of emotions signaling approach/avoidance
behaviors. Annals of New York Academy of Sciences, 2008, vol. 1, pp.
Todorov A., Pakrashi M., Oosterhof N. Evaluating faces on
trustworthiness after minimal time exposure. Social Cognition. 2009,
vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 813—833.
Tsankova E. et al. Facial and Vocal Cues in Perceptions of
Trustworthiness. In: Park JI., Kim J. (eds) Lecture Notes in Computer
Science, 2013. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Vatikiotis-Bateson E., Eigsti I.M., Yano S., Munhall K.G.
Eye movement of perceivers during audiovisual speech perception. Perception
and Psychophysics, 1998, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 926—940.
Willis J. and Todorov A. First impressions: Making up your
mind after 100 ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science. 2006, vol.
17, no. 7, pp. 592—598.
Zebrowitz L. Reading Faces: Window to the soul?
Boulder, Westview Press. 1997.