Russian Psychological Issues PsyJournals.ru
OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS
JournalsTopicsAuthorsEditor's Choice For AuthorsAbout PsyJournals.ruContact Us

  Previous issue (2019. Vol. 12, no. 3)

Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)

CrossRef

Experimental Psychology (Russia)

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

ISSN (printed version): 2072-7593

ISSN (online): 2311-7036

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17759/exppsy

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Started in 2008

Published quarterly

Free of fees
Open Access Journal

 

Development and approbation of the methodology for determining the individual negotiating style 84

Soldatova G.U., Doctor of Psychology, Professor, Head of Specialization "Psychology of Negotiation and Conflict Resolution", Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia, soldatova.galina@gmail.com
Gasimov A.F., Psychologist in the laboratory of psychology of profession and conflict, Psychology Department, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia, gasimov.anton@gmail.com
Abstract
The article presents the results of development and approbation of the method for determining the negotiation style of the personality. The methodology is based on the idea of the presence of integrative and distributive styles of negotiation. Among the distinctive features of the integrative style areorientation on collective problem solving, achieving win-win solutions, establishing a productive interaction. The distributive style is characterized by the orientation of the subject on maximizing of his own profit, often to the detriment of another, the lack of focus on long-term collaboration, the perception of the partner as a method of reaching his own goals. The approbation has been conducted on a sample of 776 people. A three-component factor structure, including such scales as “Distributive style”, “Integrative style/partner oriented” and “Integrative style /situation oriented”, has been allocated. The data obtained during the psychometric evaluation of the method indicate its consistency, reliability and validity, which allows to make a conclusion on the effectiveness of the method and the possibility to use it in the studies of the peculiarities of the negotiation process.

Keywords: negotiations, distributive negotiations, integrative negotiations, integrative style, distribution style

Column: Psychodiagnostics

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2019120307

For Reference

References
  1. Argentova Т.Е. Stil obshcheniya kak faktor ehffektivnosti sovmestnoj deyatelnosti [The style of communication as a factor in the effectiveness of joint activity] // Psihol. journal. 1984. No. 6. P. 130— 133.
  2. Asmolov A.G., Soldatova G.U., Nestik T.A., Terekhova E.S., Evdokimenko A.S. Psihologiya peregovorov // Innovacionnye obrazovatel’nye programmy po psihologii / Pod red. YU.P. Zinchenko, I.A. Volodarskoj. M.: Izd-vo MGU, 2007. P. 12—23
  3. Bratchenko, S.L. Diagnostika lichnostno-razvivayushchegosya potenciala. Metod. Posobie dlya shkolnyh psihologov [Diagnosis of personality-developing potential: Method. A manual for school psychologists] / SL Bratchenko. Pskov: 1997. 68 p.
  4. Behg’yuli F. Peregovory. Master-klass. M.: FАIR-PRESS, 2005. 224 s.
  5. Grishina N.V. Psihologiya konflikta [Psychology of conflict]. SPb., 2007.
  6. Ignateva E. A. Vyyavlenie urovnya sformirovannosti kommunikativnyh umenij virtualnogo obshcheniya [Elektronnyj resurs] Psihologo-pedagogicheskie issledovaniya 2011 4 URL http psyedu ru journal, 2011, № 4 URL: http://psyedu.ru/journal/2011/4/2581.phtml (Data obrashcheniya: 1 10 2018).
  7. Karmin A.S. Konfliktologiya [Conflictology]. SPb .: Publishing house “Lan”, 1999. 448 p.
  8. Kennedi G. Dogovorit’sya mozhno obo vsem! Kak dobivat’sya maksimuma v lyubykh peregovorakh. M.: Аl’pina Pablisher, 2018 410 s.
  9. Kunitsyna V.N., Kazarinova N.V., Pogolsha V.M. Mezhlichnostnoe obshchenie. Uchebnik dlya vuzov [Interpersonal communication. Textbook for high schools]. St. Petersburg: Peter, 2001. 544 p.
  10. Kurbatov V.I. Strategiya delovogo uspekha. Uchebnoe posobie dlya studentov vuzov [Strategy of business success. Textbook for university students]. Rostov-on-Don. Publishing house “Phoenix”, 1995, 416 with.
  11. Lebedeva M.M. Politicheskoe uregulirovanie konfliktov. Ucheb. posobie [Political Conflict Resolution: Proc. Allowance]. — Moscow: Aspect Press, 1999. 271 p.
  12. Latynov V.V. Stili rechevogo kommunikativnogo povedeniya: struktura i determinanty [Styles of speech communicative behavior: structure and determinants] // Psychological journal. 1995. № 6. С. 90—100.
  13. Mastenbrook V. Peregovory [Negotiations]. Kaluga: Kaluga Institute of Sociology, 1993. 175 p.
  14. Mokshantsev R.I. Psihologiya peregovorov. Ucheb. posobie [Psychology of negotiations. Textbook Allowance]. M .: INFRA-M; Novosibirsk: Siberian Agreement, 2002. 352 p.
  15. Satikova S.V. Problema integracii v povsednevnyh peregovorah [The problem of integration in everyday negotiations] // Proceedings of the conference Psychological and social work in modern society: problems and solutions. 2010, pp. 317—319.
  16. Sobchik L.N. Metody psihologicheskoj diagnostiki [Methods of psychological diagnosis]. Issue. 3. Diagnostics of interpersonal relationships. Modified version of interpersonal diagnosis T. Leary. Method. guide. M., 1990.
  17. Spengle ML, Eisenhart M.U. Peregovory. Reshenie problem v raznom kontekste [Conversation. Solving problems in different contexts]. — Humanitarian Center, 2009. 592 p.
  18. Subbotsky E.V. Izuchenie u rebenka smyslovyh obrazovanij [The study of the semantic formations in the child] // Vestnik Mosk.un-ta. Ser. 14, Psychology, 1977. № 1.
  19. Fetiskin NP, Kozlov VV, Manuylov G.М. Socialno-psihologicheskaya diagnostika razvitiya lichnosti i malyh grupp [Socio-psychological diagnosis of personality development and small groups]. M., Publishing house of the Institute of Psychotherapy. 2002. C. 153—156 Diagnosis of the level of polycommunicative empathy (I. Yusupov).
  20. Fisher R., Uri U. Put k soglasiyu ili peregovory bez porazheniya [The path to agreement, or negotiations without defeat]. Science, 1992.
  21. Fisher R., Shapiro D. Emotsional’nyj intellekt v peregovorakh — M.: Mann, Ivanov i Ferber, 2015 336 s.
  22. Shermerron J., Hunt J., Osborn R. Organizacionnoe povedenie [Organizational Behavior]. Peter, 2004.
  23. Alfredson T., Cungu A. Negotiation Theory and Practice: A Review of the Literature — EASYPol Module 179, 2008.
  24. Bazerman M.H. Negotiator judgment: A critical look at the rationality assumption. — Cambridge, 1991
  25. Keltner J.W. The management of struggle: Elements of dispute resolution through negotiation, mediation and arbitration. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 1994.
  26. Lewicki R.J., Barry B., Saunders D.M. and John M.W., 2003. Negotiation, 4th edition, McGraw-Hill/ Irwin.
  27. Walton R.E., McKersie R.B. A Behavioral Theory of Labour Negotiation. New York, McGraw Hill, 1965.
comments powered by Disqus
 
About PsyJournals.ru

© 2007–2019 Portal of Russian Psychological Publications. All rights reserved

PsyJournals.ru in Russian

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Catalogue of academic journals in psychology & education MSUPE

Creative Commons License

RSS Psyjournals at facebook Psyjournals at Twitter Psyjournals at Youtube Яндекс.Метрика