Teambuilding in the student audience: pros and cons 2210
, Doctor of Philology, Department of Extreme Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education , Moscow, Russia, email@example.com
Teambuilding is one of the most promising and effective methods of personnel management, the most sought after in the business world. Up to date, the characteristics of an effective team and factors influencing the efficiency of team activities in separate professional performances are studied in most details. This article provides an overview of the researches on students’ attitudes to methods of team-building applied in the area of education. We provide the comparative analysis of the factors that contribute to or hinder the organization of team activities and the ones, arousing positive attitudes of the students. We also indicate the perspectives of expanding and improving the application of team building in the educational process
- Gudvin Dzh. Issledovanie v psikhologii: Metody i planirovanie. SPb.: Piter,
2004, 558 p.
- A study of students’ attitudes towards cooperative learning. Akhtar K. [et
al.]. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2012, vol. 2, no.
11, pp. 141–147.
- Aggarwal A., Woolley A.W. Do you see what I see? The effect of members’
cognitive styles on team processes and errors in task execution. Organizational
Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 2012. no. 122 (1), pp. 92–99.
- Ashraf M. A critical look at the use of group projects as a pedagogical
tool. Journal of Education for Busines, 2004, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 213–216. doi:
- Bacon D.R., Stewart K.A., Silver W.S. Lessons from the best and worst
student team experiences: How a teacher can make a difference. Journal of
Management Education, 1999, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 467–488.
- Baron R.S., Kerr N.L. Group process, group decision, group action. 2nd ed.
Buckingham, UK: Open University Press. 2003. 260 p.
- Bolton M.K. The role of coaching in student teams: A ‘just-in-time’
approach to learning. Journal of Management Education, 1999, vol. 23, no. 3,
pp. 233–250. doi: 10.1177/105256299902300302.
- Brooks C.M., Ammons J.L. Free riding in group projects and the effects of
timing, frequency, and specificity of criteria in peer assessments. Journal of
Education for Business, 2003, vol. 78, no. 5, pp. 268–272.
- Cannon-Bowers J.A., Bowers C. Team development and functioning. APA
handbook of industrial and organizational psychology Vol. 1. Building and
developing the organization. S. Zedeck (Ed.). Washington, DC, US: American
Psychological Association, 2010, pp. 597–650.
- Does team building work? Klein C. [et al.]. Small Group Research, 2009,
vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 181–222. DOI: 10.1177/1046496408328821.
- Ettington D., Camp R. Facilitating transfer of skills between group
projects and work teams. Journal of Management Education, 2002, vol. 26, no. 4,
pp. 356–379. doi: 10.1177/105256290202600404.
- Evidence for the collective intelligence factor in the performance of human
group / Woolley A.W. [et al.]. Science, 2010, vol. 330. no. 6004, pp. 686–688.
- Fredrick T.A. Facilitating better teamwork: analysing the challenges and
strategies of classroom-based collaboration. Business Communication Quarterly,
2008, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 439–455. doi:
- Haberyan A. Team-Based learning in an Industrial: Organizational Psychology
Course. North American Journal of Psychology, 2007, vol. 9, no. 1, pp.
- Hansen R. Benefits and problems with student teams: suggestions for
improving team projects. Journal of Education for Business, 2006, vol. 82,
no.1, pp. 11–19. doi: 10.3200/JOEB.82.1.11-19.
- Hare A.P. Groups, teams, and social interaction: theories and applications.
New York: Praeger. 1993. 177 p.
- Holloway J.H. Student teamwork. Educational Leadership, 2004, vol. 61, no.
4, pp. 91–92.
- Michaelsen L.K., Knight A.B., Fink L.D. Team-based learning : A
Transformative Use of Small Groups.Westpost: Greenwood Publishing Group. 2002,
- Mullen B., Driskell J.E., Salas E. Meta-analysis and the study of group
dynamics. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1998, vol. 2, no. 4,
pp. 213–229. doi: 10.1037/1089-2618.104.22.168.
- Paff E., Huddleston P. Does it matters if I hate teamwork? What impacts
student attitudes toward teamwork? Journal of Marketing Education, 2003, vol.
23, no. 1, pp. 37–45. doi: 10.1177/0273475302250571.
- Pentland A. The new science of building great team. Harward Business
Review. Harvard: Harvard Business School Pub 2012, pp. 62–70.
- Pineda R.C., Barger B., Lerner L.D. Exploring differences in student
perceptions of teamwork: the case of U.S. and Lithuanian students. Journal of
International Business & Cultural Studies, 2009, vol. 1, pp. 1–9.
- Robbins T.L., Fredendall L.D. Correlates of team success in higher
education. Journal of Social Psychology, 2001, vol. 141, no. 1, pp. 135–136.
- Rudawska A., Szarek M. Students’ attitudes towards teamwork and their group
effectiveness. E-mentor, 2014, vol. 3, no. 55, pp. 12–21.
- Sustaining faculty organizational development through teambuilding
activities. Ismail I.A. [et al.]. The journal of Human Resource and Adult
Learning, 2008, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 201–211.
- Thompson D., Anitsal I., Barrett H. Attitudes toward teamwork in higher
education: a comparative study of religiously affiliated universities and
secular-based universities. Allied Academies International Conference. Academy
of Educational Leadership. Proceedings, 2008, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 86–98.
- Undergraduate marketing students group projects and teamwork: The good, the
bad, and the ugly. McCorkle D.E. [et al.]. Journal of Marketing Education,
1999, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 106–117. doi: 10.1177/0273475399212004.
- Underwood J.D.M. Student attitude towards socially acceptable and
unacceptable group working practices. British Journal of Psychology, 2003, vol.
94, no. 3, pp. 319–337. doi: 10.1348/000712603767876253.
- Wheeler D., Stoller J.K. Teamwork, teambuilding and leadership in
respiratory and health care. Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy, 2011,
vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 6–11.
- Wolfe A.M. Student attitudes toward team projects. Midwest Business
Administration Association (MBAA) International Spring Conference. Chicago,
Illinois: Marketing Management Association. 2008. pp. 119–126.