Analysis of personality characteristics of intellectually gifted students, causing difficulties in their process of preschool and school education
, Ph.D. in Psychology, assistant professor, Department of Applied Mathematics, Faculty of Information Technology, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia, ErmakovSS@mgppu.ru
Talented and intellectually gifted students often have difficulties in emotional and personal spheres in their learning process at school. Social maladjustment, emotional instability, increased anxiety and a number of other problems in the development of the personal sphere are common to students with a conventional development of intellectual abilities, but in the case of gifted students they are more frequent and intensive. If these problems are ignored by school teachers, psychologists and parents of gifted students, they can lead to a decrease in the ability of these children and even to a certain delay in the development of their academic abilities. The article provides an overview of contemporary foreign works aimed at identification and analysis of personal problems in gifted students. It describes different types of gifted students, their psychological characteristics that must be considered in the process of organizing their schooling with the aim of support to and development of their learning skills
- Shcheblanova E.I. Neuspeshnye odarennye shkol'niki [Unsuccessful gifted
students]. Moscow: IG-SOTsIN, 2008. 212 p. (In Russ.).
- Yurkevich V.S. Sovremennye problemy raboty s odarennymi det'mi [Elektronnyi
resurs] [Modern problems of working with gifted children]. Psikhologicheskaya
nauka i obrazovanie psyedu.ru [Psychological Science and Education psyedu.ru],
2010, no. 5, pp. 118–129. Available at:
http://psyjournals.ru/psyedu_ru/2010/n5/Yurkevich.shtml (Accessed 06.06.2016).
(In Russ., Abstr. in Engl.).
- Bayram T., Didem Ö., Betül A.T. The effect of academic risk taking levels
on the problem solving ability of gifted students. Procedia – Social and
Behavioral Sciences, 2009. Vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1099–1104.
- Blass S. The relationship between social–emotional difficulties and
underachievement of gifted students. Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors
in Schools, 2014. Vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 243–255. doi:10.1017/jgc.2014.1
- Brody L.E., Mills C.J. Gifted children with learning disabilities: A review
of the issues . Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1997. Vol. 30, no. 2, pp.
- Cristian Buică-Belciu, Doru-Vlad Popovici. Being twice exceptional: gifted
students with learning disabilities. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,
2014. Vol. 127, pp. 519–523. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.302
- Cross J.R., Cross, T.L. Clinical and mental health issues in counseling the
gifted individual. Journal of Counseling and Development, 2015. Vol. 93, no. 2,
pp. 163–172. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6676.2015.00192.x
- Fox L.H., Brody L. Models for identifying giftedness: Issues related to the
learning disabled child. Learning disabled/gifted children: Identification and
programming. L.H. Fox, L. Brody, D. Tobin (Eds.), Austin, TX: PRO-ED. French.
1983, pp. 101–116.
- Gallagher J.J. Public policy in gifted education. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin
Press. 2004. 187 p.
- GT/LD Discrete Services Frequently Asked Questions [Elektronnyi resurs].
MCPS. Montgomery County Public Schools. Rockville: Montgomery County Public
Schools. Available at:
- Harrison G.E., Haneghan, J.P.V. The gifted and the shadow of the night:
Dabrowski's overexcitabilities and their correlation to insomnia, death
anxiety, and fear of the unknown. Journal for the Education of the Gifted,
2011. Vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 669–697. doi:10.1177/016235321103400407
- Ishak N.M., Mohd H.Z.A., Abu Y.A.B. Dimensions of social skills and their
relationship with empathy among gifted and talented students in Malaysia.
Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014. Vol. 116, pp. 750–753.
- Kamarulzaman M.H. [et al.]. Language Anxiety among Gifted Learners in
Malaysia. English Language Teaching, 2013. Vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 20–29.
- Meller C.E. Protective factors as barriers to depression in gifted and non
gifted adolescents. Gifted Cchild Quarterly, 2009. Vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 3–14.
- Morrell S.B. Dialogue Journals [Elektronnyi resurs]: A Non-Threatening Way
to Correct Written Language Errors. Independent Studies and Capstones. Paper
603. Program in Audiology and Communication Sciences. Washington : Washington
University School of Medicine, 2010, 43 p. Available at:
http://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/pacs_capstones/603 (Accessed 06.06.2016).
- Peyre H. [et al.]. Emotional, behavioral and social difficulties among
high-IQ children during the preschool period: Results of the EDEN mother–child
cohort. Personality and Individual Differences, 2016. Vol. 94, pp. 366–371.
- Ramzi S., Shahla P., Jalil F. The developmental study of adjustment in
gifted and non gifted adolescents and youths regarding personality
characteristics. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2011. Vol. 30, pp.
- Renzulli J.S., Park, S. Gifted dropouts: The who and the why, Gifted Child
Quarterly, 2000. Vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 261-271.
- Rosadah Abd. Majid, Aliza Alias. Consequences of Risk Factors in the
Development of Gifted Children. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2010.
Vol. 7, pp. 63–69. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.10.010
- Wechsler profiles in referred children with intellectual giftedness:
associations with trait-anxiety, emotional dysregulation, and heterogeneity of
Piaget-like reasoning processes. Speranza F.M., [et al.]. European Journal of
Paediatric Neurology: EJPN: Official Journal of the European Paediatric
Neurology Society, 2015. Vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 402–410.
- Thevasigamoney A.F., Melor Md. Yunus. A glimpse into E-Mail Dialogue
Journal Writing (EDJW) and writing anxiety among gifted learners. Procedia –
Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014. Vol. 123, pp. 266–271.
- Walter-Echols E. Journaling as writing practice, reflection, and personal
expression [Электронный ресурс]. CamTESOL Conference on English Language
Teaching: Selected Papers, 2008. Vol. 4, pp. 120-131. Available at:
- Weinfeld R. [et al.]. Academic programs for gifted and talented/learning
disabled students. Roeper Review, 2002. Vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 226-233.
- Zeidner M., Shani-Zinovich I. Do academically gifted and nongifted students
differ on the Big-Five and adaptive status? Some recent data and conclusions.
Personality and Individual Differences, 2011. Vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 566–570.