Russian Psychological Issues PsyJournals.ru
OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS
JournalsTopicsAuthorsEditor's Choice About PsyJournals.ruContact Us

  Previous issue (2018. Vol. 7, no. 4)

Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

ISSN (online): 2304-4977

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17759/jmfp

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Started in 2012

Published quarterly

Free of fees
Open Access Journal

 

Formative assessment (assessment for learning) educational achievements of students

Zemlyаnskaya E.N., Dr., Dr. Sci. (Pedagogy), Professor, Head of the Theory and practice of primary education Chair, Moscow State Pedagogical University, Moscow, Russia, enz_888@mail.ru
Abstract
We present definition of the concept of formative assessment and its significance for modern education. Displaying developmental approach in foreign studies, the further development, the risks and the possibility of their reduction. We discuss some of the techniques and examples of formative assessment. We investigate the relationship between formative and final evaluation, including the national curriculum levels

Keywords: formative assessment, assessment for learning, summative assessment, modernization of education, reforms in education, the planned level of educational outcomes, the national curriculum levels, scaffold

Column: Educational psychology

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2016050305

For Reference

References
  1. Ainsworth L. Common formative assessment [Elektronnyi resurs]: An overview. The leadership and learning center, 2006. 1 p. URL: http://www.doe.in.gov/sites/default/files/turnaround-principles/2fdtcommonformassess.pdf (Accessed: 17.04.2016).
  2. Black P. et al. Assessment For Learning. Putting it into practice. Berkshire: Open University Press, 2004. 135 p.
  3. Black P., William D. Seven Strategies of Assessment for Learning. Oxford. 2008. 32 p.
  4. Black P.; Wiliam D. Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 1998. Vol.5, no. 1, pp. 7–74. doi. 10.1080/0969595980050102
  5. Clarke S., McCallum B., Lopez-Charles G. Gillingham partnership formative assessment project 2000-2001. London, Uk: Institute of Education, University of London, 2002.
  6. Crooks T.J. The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of Educational Research, 1988. Vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 438–481. doi:10.3102/00346543058004438
  7. Fuchs L.S., Fuchs D. Effects of systematic formative evaluation: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 1986. Vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 199–208. doi:10.1177/001440298605300301
  8. Gd1student [Elektronnyi resurs] URL: http://gd1student.wikispaces.com/Finland (Accessed: 17.04.2016).
  9. Greenstein L. What Teachers Really Need to Know About Formative Assessment [Elektronnyi resurs]. Alexandria, VA: ASCD, 2010. 194 p. URL: https://books.google.ru/books?id=3_FQBAAAQBAJ&lpg=PP1&hl=ru&pg=PP1#v=onepage&q&f=false http://www.ascd.org/publications/books/110017/chapters/The-Fundamentals-of-Formative-Assessment.aspx (Accessed: 17.04.2016).
  10. Harlen W. Effective teaching of science: a review of research. Scottish Council for Research in Education, Edinburgh, 1999. 105 p.
  11. Heritage M. Learning progressions: Supporting instruction and formative assessment [Elektronnyi resurs]. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers, 2008. 31 p. Available at: http://www.cpre.org/ccii/images/stories/ccii_pdfs/learning%20progressions_heritage.pdf (Accessed 03.11.2016).
  12. Heritage M. The process of formative assessment // Presentation at the meeting of Iowa Assessment for Learning Institute. Des Moines, IA: Iowa Assessment for Learning Institute, 2009.
  13. Gullickson A.R. (еd.) Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. The student evaluation standards: How to improve evaluations of students. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press; Educational Policy Leadership Institute, 2003. 240 p.
  14. Literature R. Assessment For Learning (Formative Assessment) [Elektronnyi resurs]. 2009. 13 p. Available at: http://www.gwaea.org/iowacorecurriculum/docs/AssessmentForLearning_LitReviewFinal.pdf (Accessed 21.3.2016).
  15. Natriello G. The impact of evaluation processes on students. Educational Psychologist, 1987. Vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 155–175. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2202_4
  16. Sadler D.R. Formative assessment and the design of instructional strategies. Instructional Science, 1989. Vol. 18, pp. 119–144. doi:10.1007/BF00117714
  17. Shepard L.A. Formative assessment: Caveat emptor «ETS Invitational Confence The Future of Assessment: Shaping Teaching and Learning» [Elektronnyi resurs]. New York: ETS Invitational Conference, 2005. 37 p. Available at: http://www.cpre.org/ccii/images/stories/ccii_pdfs/shepard%20formative%20assessment%20caveat%20emptor.pdf (Accessed 03.11.2016).
  18. Tuttle H.G. Formative Assessment: Responding to your students». New York: Eye on Education, 2009. 160 p.
  19. Wiliam D. Formative assessment: Getting the focus right. Educational Assessment, 2006. Vol. 11(3 & 4), p. 289. doi: 10.1080/10627197.2006.9652993
  20. Wiliam D., Black P. Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards Through Classroom Assessment. USA: Learning Sciences, 1990. 40 p.
  21. Black P., et al. Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, 2004. Vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 9–21.
comments powered by Disqus
 
About PsyJournals.ruLaureate of the XIV National psychological contest «Golden Psyche» at the results of 2012

© 1997–2019 Portal of Russian Psychological Publications. All rights reserved

PsyJournals.ru in Russian

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Catalogue of academic journals in psychology & education MSUPE

RSS Psyjournals at facebook Psyjournals at Twitter Psyjournals at Youtube Яндекс.Метрика