Skip to Main Content

Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology
2018. Vol. 7, no. 3, 75–86
doi:10.17759/jmfp.2018070307
ISSN: 2304-4977 (online)

Analysis of the questionnaire of preschool parental involvement with an aid of Rush ranking model

833

I.V. Antipkina

PDF (RUS)
Online translation in english
GS
Information
in Google Scholar

Abstract

The paper presents a procedure for analysis and improvement of the questionnaire of preschool parental involvement, created on the basis of the questionnaire for parents and designed for the international comparative study TIMSS-PIRLS 2011. The article introduces a detailed description of methodology of analysiswith the reference to one of Rush’s rating scales (RSM). The article shows the characteristics of modified scales. It describes the levels of preschool parental involvement and makes it possible to use this scale in work of researchers and school psychologists.

General Information

Keywords: parental involvement, IRT, Rush, questionnaire

Journal rubric: Developmental Psychology and Age-Related Psychology

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2018070307

For citation: Antipkina I.V. Analysis of the questionnaire of preschool parental involvement with an aid of Rush ranking model [Elektronnyi resurs]. Sovremennaia zarubezhnaia psikhologiia = Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 2018. Vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 75–86. DOI: 10.17759/jmfp.2018070307. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Kardanova E.Yu. et al. Obobshchennye tipy razvitiya pervoklassnikov na vkhode v shkolu. Po materialam issledovaniya iPIPS [Generalized types of development of first-graders at the entrance to the school. Based on the materials of the study iPIPS] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Voprosy obrazovaniya [Education issues], 2018, no. 1, pp. 8–37. Available at: https://vo.hse.ru/data/2018/03/28/1164927140/01%20Kardanova.pdf (Accessed 10.08.2018). (In Russ.; Abstr. in Engl.).
  2. Andrich D. An index of person separation in latent trait theory, the traditional KR. 20 index, and the Guttman scale response pattern [Elektronnyi resurs]. Education Research and Perspectives, 1982, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 95–104. Available at: https://rasch.org/erp7.htm (Accessed 10.08.2018).
  3. Bakker J., Denessen E., Brus-Laeven M. Socio-economic background, parental involvement and teacher perceptions of these in relation to pupil achievement. Educational Studies, 2007, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 177–192. doi:10.1080/03055690601068345
  4. Frick P.J., Christian R.C., Wootton J.M. Age trends in the association between parenting practices and conduct problems. Behavior Modification, 1999, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 106–128. doi:10.1177/0145445599231005
  5. Jeynes W.H. Parental involvement research: Moving to the next level [Elektronnyi resurs]. School Community Journal, 2011, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 9–18. Available at: http://www.adi.org/journal/resources/2011ss_scj.pdf#page=9 (Accessed 10.08.2018).
  6. Lareau A. Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. Berkeley, CA: Univ of California Press, 2011. 480 p.
  7. Linacre J.M. Investigating rating scale category utility [Elektronnyi resurs]. Journal of outcome measurement, 1999, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 103–122. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2d4c/958ebc9a59cf726fe2ed1f9668ee9a40be93.pdf#page=5 (Accessed 10.08.2018).
  8. Linacre J.M. Winsteps Rasch measurement computer program [Elektronnyi resurs]. Beaverton, OR, 2017. Available at: http://www.winsteps.com/index.htm (Accessed 10.08.2018).
  9. Masters G.N. Partial credit model. In Wim J. van der Linden (Ed.) Handbook of Item Response Theory, Volume One. Boca Raton; London; New York: CRC Press,2016. P. 137–154. doi:10.4324/9780203861264.ch5
  10. Mead R.J. A Rasch primer: The measurement theory of Georg Rasch [Elektronnyi resurs]. Maple Grove, MN: Data Recognition Corporation, 2008. 53 p. Available at: http://www.edmeasurement.net/8226/Mead-2008-Rasch-primer.pdf (Accessed 10.08.2018).
  11. Ludlow L.H. et al. Measuring engagement in later life activities: Rasch-based scenario scales for work, caregiving, informal helping, and volunteering. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 2014, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 127–149. doi:10.1177/0748175614522273
  12. Walker J.M. et al. Parental involvement: Model revision through scale development. The Elementary School Journal, 2005, vol. 106, no. 2, pp. 85–104. doi:10.1086/499193
  13. Pomerantz E.M., Moorman E.A., Litwack S.D. The how, whom, and why of parents’ involvement in children’s academic lives: More is not always better. Review of educational research, 2007, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 373–410. doi:10.3102/003465430305567
  14. Grolnick W.S. et al. Predictors of parent involvement in children's schooling. Journal of educational psychology, 1997, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 538–548. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.89.3.538
  15. Sénéchal M., LeFevre J.A. Parental involvement in the development of children’s reading skill: A five-year longitudinal study. Child development, 2002, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 445–460. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00417
  16. Smith E.V. Detecting and evaluating the impact of multidimensionality using item fit statistics and principal component analysis of residuals. Journal of Applied Measurement, 2002, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 205–231.
  17. Kardanova E. et al. The Role Of The iPIPS Assessment In Providing High Quality Value Added Information On School And System Effectiveness Within And Between Countries (December 9, 2014). Higher School of Economics Research Paper No. WP BRP 20/EDU/2014. 2014. 24 p. (Education).
  18. Kastberg D. et al. US TIMSS and PIRLS 2011 Technical Report and User's Guide. NCES 2013-046 [Elektronnyi resurs]. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, 2013. 168 p. Available at: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED545101.pdf (Accessed 10.08.2018).
  19. Wilder S. Effects of parental involvement on academic achievement: a meta-synthesis. Educational Review, 2014, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 377–397. doi:10.1080/00131911.2013.780009
  20. Wright B.D., Masters G.N. Rating scale analysis [Elektronnyi resurs]. Chicago: Mesa Press, 1982. 206 p. Available at: https://research.acer.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1001&context=measurement (Accessed 10.08.2018).
  21. Zwick R., Thayer D.T. Evaluating the magnitude of Differential Item Functioning in polytomous items. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statisti, 1996, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 187–201. doi:10.3102/10769986021003187

Information About the Authors

IInna V. Antipkina, Junior Scientific Fellow, Institute of Education, Centre for Monitoring the Quality, Education National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4865-3433, e-mail: iantipkina@hse.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 1370
Previous month: 9
Current month: 10

Downloads

Total: 833
Previous month: 9
Current month: 4