Skip to Main Content

Clinical Psychology and Special Education
2019. Vol. 8, no. 2, 38–52
doi:10.17759/cpse.2019080203
ISSN: 2304-0394 (online)

Specificity of the Cognitive Status of Students with Hearing Impairment: Implications for Inclusive Education

561

K.D. Krivonogova, O.M. Razumnikova

PDF (RUS)
Online translation in english
GS
Information
in Google Scholar

Abstract

Specificity of intelligence, attention and memory were studied in students with hearing impairment (26 individuals). This group shown less indicators of verbal intelligence and speed of selection of visually presented information as compared to the normal hearing group (28 individuals). Higher index of figurative and spatial intelligence, comparing to the verbal component of intelligence in the group with hearing impairments indicate the development of compensatory effect in visual functions. The smaller effect of proactive interference with a greater time of executive control in students with hearing impairments compared with the control group indicates a lack of development of the inhibitory functions of the prefrontal cortex.

General Information

Keywords: hearing impairment, intelligence, attention systems, visual memory, inclusive education

Journal rubric: Empirical Research

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/cpse.2019080203

Funding. This work was supported in part by grant RFBR № 17-06-00166.

For citation: Krivonogova K.D., Razumnikova O.M. Specificity of the Cognitive Status of Students with Hearing Impairment: Implications for Inclusive Education [Elektronnyi resurs]. Klinicheskaia i spetsial'naia psikhologiia = Clinical Psychology and Special Education, 2019. Vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 38–52. DOI: 10.17759/cpse.2019080203. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Aismontas B.B., Odintsova M.A. Inkluzivnzya obrazovatelnaya sreda vuza kak resurs dlya razvitiya zhiznestoikosti I samoaktivazii studentov s invalidnostiu [Inclusive educational environment of the university as a resource for the development of resilience and self-activation of students with disabilities]. Psihologicheskaya nauka I obrazovanie [Psychological Science and Education], 2018, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 29–41. doi:10.17759/pse.2018230204 (in Russ., abstr. in Engl.)
  2. Velichkovskiy B.B. Vozmozhnosti kognitivnoi trenirovki kak metoda korrektsii vozrastnykh narushenii kognitivnogo kontrolya [Performance capabilities of cognitive training as a method of correcting age-related decline in cognitive control]. Eksperimental'naya psikhologiya [Experimental Psychology], vol. 2., no. 3, pp. 78–91 (in Russ., abstr. in Engl.)
  3. Razumnikova O.M. Zakonomernosti stareniya mozga i sposoby aktivatsii ego kompensatornykh resursov [Effects of aging brain and activation methods of its compensatory resources].  Uspehi fiziologicheskih nauk [Advances in physiological sciences], 2015, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 3–16 (in Russ., abstr. in Engl.)
  4. Razumnikova O.M., Volf N.V. Reorganizatsiya svyazi intellekta s kharakteristikami vnimaniya i pamyati pri starenii [Aging-induced reorganization of association between intelligence and characteristics of attention and memory]. Zhurnal vysshei nervnoi deyatel'nosti [Journal of Higher Nervous Activity], 2017, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 55–67 (in Russ., abstr. in Engl.)
  5. Razumnikova O.M, Nikolaeva E.I. Tormoznye funktsii mozga i vozrastnye osobennosti organizatsii kognitivnoi deyatel'nosti [Inhibitory brain functions and age-associated specificities in organization of cognitive activity]. Uspehi fiziologicheskih nauk [Advances in physiological sciences], 2019, vol. 49, no. 1, pp.1–15 (in Russ, abstr. in Engl.)
  6. Khohlova A.U. Bilogicheskii, psihologicheskie I socialnye factory, vliyauzhie na intellectualnoe razvitie detei s narusheniem sluha v zarubezhnoi psihologii gluhih [Biological, psychological and social factors affecting the intellectual development of children with hearing impairment in the foreign psychology of the deaf]. Spezialnaya psihologiya [Special Psychology], 2005, no. 3-4, pp.13–25 (in Russ., abstr. in Engl.)
  7. Best J.R., Miller P.H., Naglieri J.A. Relations between executive function and academic achievement from ages 5 to 17 in a large, representative, national sample. Learning and Individual Differences, 2011, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 327–336. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2011.01.007
  8. Botting N., Jones A., Marshall C., et al. Nonverbal executive function is mediated by language: A study of deaf and hearing children. Child Development, 2017, vol. 88, no. 5, pp. 1689–1700. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12659
  9. Chaddock-Heyman L., Erickson K.I., Voss M.W. et al. White matter microstructure is associated with cognitive control in children. Biological Psychology, 2013, vol. 94, no. 1, pp.109–115. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.05.008.
  10. Fan J., McCandliss B.D., Sommer T., et al. Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2002, vol. 14, no. 3, pp.340–347. doi: 10.1162/089892902317361886
  11. Figueras B., Edwards L., Langdon D. Executive function and language. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 2008, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 362–377. doi: 10.1093/deafed /enm067
  12. Green C.S., Strobach T., Schubert T. On methodological standards in training and transfer experiments. Psychological Research, 2014, vol. 78, no. 6, pp. 756–772. doi: 10.1007/s00426-013-0535-3
  13. Jaeggi S.M., Buschkuehl M., Jonides J., et al. Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2008,
    vol. 105, no. 19, pp. 6829–6833. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0801268105
  14. Karbach J., Unger K. Executive control training from middle childhood to adolescence. Frontiers in Psychology, 2014, vol. 5, no. 390. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00390
  15. Madsen K.S., Baaré W.F.C., Vestergaard, M., et al. Response inhibition is associated with white matter microstructure in children. Neuropsychologia, 2010, vol. 48, no. 4,
    pp. 854–862. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.11.001
  16. Merabet L.B., Pascual-Leone A. Neural reorganization following sensory loss: The opportunity of change. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2010, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 44–52. doi:10.1038/nrn2758
  17. Pereira-Jorge M.R., Andrade K.C., Palhano-Fontes F.X., et al. Anatomical and functional MRI changes after one year of auditory rehabilitation with hearing aids. Neural Plasticity, 2018. Available at: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/np/2018/9303674/. (Accessed: 15.12.2018). doi: 10.1155/2018/9303674
  18. Razumnikova O., Savinykh M., Suslov R., et al. A computeIized cognitive test battery. Individual differences in cognitive characteristics: Measuring and dynamic of training. In: Proc. 11th Intern. Forum on Strategic Technology (IFOST). 24 August, 2018. Novosibirsk: ICG SB RAS, 2018. pp. 256–258.
  19. Sakagami M., Pan X., Uttl B. Behavioral inhibition and prefrontal cortex in decision-making. Neural Networks, 2006, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 1255–1265. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2006. 05.040
  20. Scheich H., Brechmann A., Brosch M., et al. Behavioral semantics of learning and crossmodal processing in auditory cortex: the semantic processor concept. Hearing Research, 2011, vol. 271, no. 1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2010.10.006.
  21. Stevenson J., Pimperton H., Kreppner J., et al. Emotional and behaviour difficulties in teenagers with permanent childhood hearing loss. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 2017, vol. 101, pp. 186–195. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.07.031
  22. Titz C., Karbach J. Working memory and executive functions: effects of training on academic achievement. Psychological Research, 2014, vol. 78, no. 6, pp. 852–868. doi: 10.1007/s00426-013-0537-1
  23. Worsfold S., Mahon M., Pimperton H., et al. Predicting reading ability in teenagers who are deaf or hard of hearing: A longitudinal analysis of language and reading. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 2018, vol. 77, pp. 49–59. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2018.04.007
  24. Zhou X, Merzenich M.M. Developmentally degraded cortical temporal processing restored by training. Nature Neuroscience, 2009, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 26–28. doi:10.1038 /nn.2239.

Information About the Authors

Kseniya D. Krivonogova, PhD Student of Department of Psychology and Pedagogic, Novosibirsk State Technical University, Educational Psychologist, Institute of Social Technologies and Rehabilitation, Novosibirsk, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4773-0396, e-mail: kseniansk123@gmail.com

Olga M. Razumnikova, Doctor of Biology, Professor of the Department of Psychology and Pedagogic, Novosibirsk State Technical University, Novosibirsk, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7831-9404, e-mail: razoum@mail.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 1188
Previous month: 11
Current month: 13

Downloads

Total: 561
Previous month: 3
Current month: 8