The Use of Social Networks in Education and Socialization of Adolescents: an Analytical Review of Empirical Studies (International Experience)

We present a review of foreign studies on the use of social networks in teaching practice. We provide the description of social media as a potential new resource, providing the organization of teacher-student interaction, group communication of students, increasing the involvement of students in the learning process. It is shown that social networking services are relevant to the teenagers request: the pursuit of intimate-personal communication. For the review were selected publications about social networking in education over the past 3 years, satisfying the criteria of describing the details of empirical research. Comparative analysis showed that social media are used in two main ways: 1) as support and operationalization of existing forms of educational work, and 2) to development of the learning process. We confirmed the presence of the «digital gap» between students and teachers that is not in favor of the latter: the described positive results are associated with a wide variety of activities of students, and negative -with low technological literacy and higher workload of teachers.

1. Gurkina O. A., Novikova E. M. Chem tak privlekatel’ny sotsial’nye seti dlya podrostkov? [Ele­ktronnyi resurs] [What is so attractive in the social network for teenagers?]. Laboratoriya monitorin­govykh issledovanii MGPPU mgppu.rf [Laboratory of monitoring studies MGPPU], 2014. Available at: http://xn--c1arkau.xn--p1ai/projectpages/index/202 (Accessed 10.10.2014).
2. Kondrashkin A. V. Internet v razvitii sovremen­nykh podrostkov [Elektronnyi resurs] [Internet in the development of modern teenagers]. Psikholog­icheskaya nauka i obrazovanie PSYEDU.ru [Psy­chological Science and Education PSYEDU.ru], 2013, no. 2. Available at: www.psyedu.ru / ISSN: 2074-5885 (Accessed 10.10.2014) (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
3. Soldatova G. U. Tsifrovaya kompetentnost’ pod­rostkov i roditelei. Rezul’taty vserossiiskogo issle­dova niya [Digital competence of adolescents and their parents. The results of nationwide research] Moscow: Fond Razvitiya Internet [Internet Develop­ment Fund], 2013. 144 p.
4.  Federal’nye gosudarstvennye obrazovatel’nye standarty obshchego obrazovaniya [Elektronnyi resurs] [Federal state educational standards of general education]. Ministerstvo obrazovaniya RF eng.mon.gov.ru [Ministry of Education Russian Federation eng.mon.gov.ru], 2014. Available at: http://eng.mon.gov.ru/dokumenty/543 (Accessed: 10.10.2014)..
5. Tsymbalenko S. B. Vliyanie Interneta na rossi­iskikh podrostkov i yunoshestvo v kontekste raz­vitiya rossiiskogo informatsionnogo prostranstva. Reaul’taty sotsiologichegkogo issledovaniya [Elekt­ronnyi resurs] [Effect of the Internet on Russian adolescents and young adults in the context of the development of the Russian information space. The results of sociological research]. Media. Informat­siya. Kommunikatsiya [Media. Information. Commu­nication], 2012. Available at: http://lfrnic.rg.rufindex. phpf_new (Accessed 10.10.2014).
6. El’konin D. B. K probleme periodizatsii psikhiche­skogo razvitiya v detskom vozraste: Izbrannye psikho-logicheskie Trudy [On the problem of periodi­zation of mental development in childhood: Selected psychological works]. Moscow, 1989. 560 p.
7. Baker–Eveleth L., Sarker S., Eveleth D. M. Forma­tion of an online community of practice: An induc­tive study unearthing key elements. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (Waikoloa, January 3-6, 2005), 2005. 254 p.
8. Bauerlein M. The Dumbest Generation: How the Digital Age Stupefies Young Americans and Jeop­ardizes Our Future (Or, Don’t Trust Anyone Under 30). Tarcher, 2009. 253 p.
9. Boyd D. M., Ellison N. B. Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2007. Vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 210–230.
10. Bumgardner S., Knestis K. Social networking as a tool for student and teacher learning. District Ad­ministration, 2011. Vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 85–86.
11. Buzzetto-More N. A. Social Networking in Un­dergraduate Education. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, Special Section on Social Networking, Teaching, and Learn­ing, 2012. Vol. 7, no.1, pp. 63–90.
12. Calafiore P., Damianov D. S. The Effect of Time Spent Online on Student Achievement in Online Economics and Finance Courses. Journal of Eco­nomic Education, 2011. Vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 209–223.
13. Cardona-Divale M. The dissertation: Student in­teraction and community building: an evaluation of social networking in online learning environments. ProQuest LLC, 2012, Publication number 3505771. 100 p.
14. Carr N. Is Google Making us Stupid? What the Internet is Doing to our Brains. The Atlantic Month­ly. Available at: www.thea tlantic.com/magazine/ archive/2008/07/is-google-making-us-stupid/6868. (Accessed 10.10.2014).
15. EU Kids Online: Final report. LSE, London: EU Kids Online (EC Safer Internet Plus Programme De­liverable D 6.5), 2009. 50 p.
16. Falahaha, Rosmalab D. Study of Social Net­working Usage in Higher Education Environment.
17. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2012. Vol. 67, pp. 156–166.
18. Grossecka G., Branb R., Tiruc L. Dear teacher, what should I write on my wall? A case study on academic uses of Facebook. University of the West
19. Timisoara, Faculty of Sociology and Psychology, 2013. 23 p.
20. Herring S. C. Questioning the Generational Di­vide: Technological Exoticism in Adult Construction of online youth identity. Youth, Identity, and Digital Media. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2007, pp. 70–92.
21. Hoffman D. L., Novak T. P. The evolution of the digital divide: examining the relationship of race to internet access and usage over time. Book. The digi­tal divide MIT Press Cambridge, 2001, pp. 47–97.
22. Jones C. Shao B. The net generation and digi­tal natives: Implications for higher education. Higher Education Academy, York, 2011, pp. 250–264.
23. Junco R. Too much face and not enough books: The relationship between multiple indices of Face-book use and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 2012. Vol. 28. 64 p.
24. Kirschner P. A. Karpinski A. C. Facebook and academic performance. Computers in Human Be­havior, 2010. Vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 237–1245
25. Krasilnikov A. A., Semenova M. Do Social Net­works Help to Improve Student Academic Perform­ance? The Case of Vk .com and Russian Students. Economics Bulletin, 2014. Vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 718–733.
26. Luttrell R. Social networking sites in the public relations classroom: a mixed methods analysis of undergraduate learning outcomes using wordpress, facebook, and twitter. A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the California Institute of Integral Stu­dies, 2012. 78 p.
27. Madge C., Meek J., Wellens J. Hooley T. Face-book, social integration and informal learning at uni­versity: It is more for socia lising and talking to friends about work than for actually doing work. Learning, Media and Technology, 2009. Vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 141–155.
28. Prensky M. Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 2011. Vol. 9, no. 5. 56 p.
29. Pew Internet & American Life Project’s. URL: http:// www.pewinternet.org (Accessed 10.10.2014) Shih R. C. Can Web 2.0 technology assist college students in learning English writing? Integra ting Fa­cebook and peer assessment with blended learning. In J. Waycott (eds.) Assessing students’ Web 2.0 activities in higher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2011. Vol. 27, no . 5, pp. 829–845.
30. Thurlow C. From Statistical Panic to Moral Panic: The Metadiscursive Construction in Popular Exag­geration of New Media Language in the Print Me­dia. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2006 . Vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 667–701.
31. Tower S., Latimer S., Hewit J. Social networking as a learning tool: Nursing students’ percept ion of ef­ficacy. Nurse Education Today, 2014. Vol. 34, no.1, pp. 1012–1017.
32. VanDoorn G., Eklund A. Face to Facebook: So­cial media and the learning and teaching potential of symmetrical, synchronous communication. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 2013. Vol. 10. Issue 1. Article 6. 120 p.
33. Wasko M., Faraj S., Teigland R. Collective action and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 2004. Vol. 11, no. 1. 76 p.
34. Webb E. Engaging students with engaging tools. Edu cause Quarte rly, 2009. Vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 1–7.
35. Wenger E., White N., Smith J. Digital Habitats: stewarding technology for communities Portland, OR: CPsquare, 2009. 512 p.
36. Wenger E. Communities of Practice: Learning , Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni­versity Press, 1998. 312 p.
37. Wodzicki K., Schwämmlein E., Moskaliuk J. «Actually, I Wanted to Lea rn»: Study-related know­ledge exchange on social networking sites. In­ternet and Higher Education, 2012. Vol. 15, pp. 9–14.
38. Yunus M., Salehi H., Chenzi C. Integrating So­cial Networking Tools into ESL Writing Classroom: Strengths and Weaknesses . Canadian Center of Science and Education, 2012. Vol. 5, no. 8. 63 p.