Skip to Main Content

Psychological-Educational Studies
2019. Vol. 11, no. 2, 58–73
doi:10.17759/psyedu.2019110206
ISSN: 2587-6139 (online)

Perceptions and Attitudes towards European Values among Russian Bachelor Students of Moscow University

440

O.E. Khukhlaev, M.Y. Chibisova, S.A. Usybyan

PDF (RUS)
Online translation in english
GS
Information
in Google Scholar

Abstract

The article presents results of empirical research devoted to perception and attitudes towards European values among Russian bachelor students of Moscow University. Group discussion (focs-groups) were conducted. 60 bachelor students from MSUPE (“Psychology” and “Youth work” learning directions) took part in the study. The focus groups’ transcripts were analyzed using the phenomenological approach as well as “grounded theory”. It was presumed that the attitude towards European values would be controversial and that students of different leaning directions would have specific characteristics in their perception of European values. The research results show that the representations of European values among Russian bachelor students can be divided into three semantic groups: “Values as social practices”, “Values in social-political sphere”, “Material culture values”. Attitudes towards them is characterized by abundance of controversial semantics.

General Information

Keywords: students, values, Europe, Europeans, Russia, academic mobility

Journal rubric: Psychology of Education

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psyedu.2019110206

Funding. This project has been funded with support from the European Commission (Erasmus+ project #575548-EPP-1-2016-1-RU-EPPJMO-MODULE). The European Commission support for the production of this publication does not constitute an endorsement of the contents which reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.

For citation: Khukhlaev O.E., Chibisova M.Y., Usybyan S.A. Perceptions and Attitudes towards European Values among Russian Bachelor Students of Moscow University [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psychological-Educational Studies, 2019. Vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 58–73. DOI: 10.17759/psyedu.2019110206. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Atanesyan A.V. «My» i «oni»: obraz Evropy i evropeitsev v vospriyatii erevanskoi molodezhi ["We" and "they": the image of Europe and Europeans in the perception of Yerevan youth], Caucasian Science Bridge, 2018, no 1, pp. 88–102. (In Russ., Abstr. in Engl.).
  2. Bovina I.B. Rossiya i sovremennyi mir kak sotsial'nye predstavleniya [Elektronnyi resurs] [Russia and the modern world as social representations]. Psikhologo-pedagogicheskie issledovaniya [Psychological-Education Studies], 2012, no. 2. URL: https://psyjournals.ru/psyedu_ru/2012/n2/53533.shtml (Accessed: 03.02.2019). (In Russ., Abstr. in Engl.).
  3. Vyborochnoe sotrudnichestvo mezhdu ES i Rossiei. Promezhutochnyi doklad EUREN-oktyabr', 2018 [Elektronnyi resurs] [Selective cooperation between the EU and Russia. The interim report of the EUREN-October, 2018]. RSMD. Available at: http://russiancouncil.ru/activity/publications/vyborochnoe-sotrudnichestvo-mezhdu-es-i-rossiey/ (Accessed: 24.02.2019).
  4. Gessel' A. O evropeiskikh tsennostyakh. [Elektronnyi resurs] [About European values] URL: http://www.civisbook.ru/files/File/Gessel_Tetr_55.pdf (Accessed: 20.04.2019).
  5. Golynchik E.O. Preimushchestva ispol'zovaniya kachestvennykh metodov v sovremennykh issledovaniyakh vospriyatiya konflikta [Advantages of using qualitative methods in contemporary research in the perception of conflict]. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo [Social psychology and society], 2018, no 3., pp. 53–61. doi:10.17759/sps.2018090306 (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
  6. Gulevich O.A., Ermolaeva N.N. Svyaz' mnozhestvennoi kategorizatsii s etnicheskimi predrassudkami: rol' sotsial'nykh verovanii [Connection of multiple categorization with ethnic prejudices: the role of social beliefs]. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo [Social psychology and society], 2014, Is. 5, no 1, pp.31–42. (In Russ., Abstr. in Engl.).
  7. Dembitskii S.«Obosnovannaya teoriya»: strategiya sbora i analiza kachestvennykh dannykh pri teoreticheskoi validizatsii ["Grounded theory": strategy of collection and analysis of qualitative data under theoretical validation]. Sotsiologiya: teoriya, metody, marketing [Sociology: theory, methods, marketing], 2010, no. 2, pp. 64–83. (In Russ., Abstr. in Engl.).
  8. Il'ina T.S., Plakidina S.E., Plotnikova E.S. Problemy razvitiya akademicheskoi mobil'nosti studentov v Rossii [Problems of development of academic mobility of students in Russia]. Nauchnyi al'manakh [Scientific almanac], 2018, no. 5-1(43), pp. 153–164. (In Russ., Abstr. in Engl.).
  9. Istomina K.V., Nikitova S.G. Sotsial'nye predposylki formirovaniya tsennostnykh orientirov v vysshem obrazovanii [Social background of the formation of values in higher education].Vlast'[Government], 2015, Is. 23, no. 11, pp. 80–83. (In Russ., Abstr. in Engl.).
  10. Kosharnaya G.B., Kosharnyi V.P. Triangulyatsiya kak sposob obespecheniya validnosti rezul'tatov empiricheskogo issledovaniya [Triangulation as a way to ensure the validity of the results of empirical research]. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii. Povolzhskii region. Obshchestvennye nauki [Proceedings of Higher Educational Institutions. Volga region. Social science], 2016, no. 2 (38). pp. 117–122. doi: 10.21685/2072-3016-2016-2-13
  11. Movsisyan A.A. Obraz Rossii i Evropy v strukture politicheskikh predstavlenii moskovskogo studenchestva [Image of Russia and Europe in the structure of political representations of Moscow students]. Vestnik RUDN, seriya Politologiya [Vestnik RUDN, series Political Science], 2014, no. 1, pp. 113–127. (In Russ., Abstr. in Engl.).
  12. Morozova E.V. Vospriyatie obraza Evropy rossiiskimi studentami: «pertseptivnye fil'try» [Perception of the image of Europe by Russian students: "perceptive filters"]. Kaspiiskii region: politika, ekonomika, kul'tura [Caspian region: politics, economy, culture], 2018, no. 1 (54), pp. 37–44. (In Russ., Abstr. in Engl.).
  13. Rodygina U.S. Psikhologicheskie osobennosti professional'noi identichnosti studentov [Psychological features of professional identity of students]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie [Psychological science and education], 2007, no. 4, pp. 39–51. (In Russ., Abstr. in Engl.).
  14. Rossiya i Evropa glazami rossiyan [Russia and Europe through the eyes of Russians]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological studies], 2003, no. 5 (229), pp. 41. (In Russ., Abstr. in Engl.).
  15. Semenova V.V. Kachestvennye metody: vvedenie v gumanisticheskuyu sotsiologiyu: Ucheb. posobie dlya studentov vuzov [Qualitative methods: introduction to humanistic sociology: Handbook for University students ]. In-t sotsiologii RAN. M.: Dobrosvet, 1998.
  16. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya razvitiya [Social psychology of development]. Pod. red. N.N. Tolstykh. M.: Izdatel'stvo Yurait, 2014. 603 p.
  17. Strause A., Korbin Dzh. Osnovy kachestvennogo issledovaniya: obosnovannaya teoriya, protsedury i tekhniki [Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and technique]. M: Editorial URSS, 2001. 256 p.
  18. Tokmovtseva M.V. Problemy akademicheskoi mobil'nosti v svete prinyatiya novogo Federal'nogo zakona «Ob obrazovanii v Rossiiskoi Federatsii» [Electronic resource] [Problems of academic mobility in the light of the adoption of the new Federal law "On education in Russian Federation"]. Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie i psikhologicheskie problemy upravleniya . Sbornik nauchnykh statei po materialam I (IV) Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii, prokhodivshei v Moskovskom gorodskom psikhologo-pedagogicheskom universitete s 23 po 25 aprelya 2013 goda. Pod obshchei red. M.G. Kovtunovich. Chast' 1 [Socio-economic and psychological problems of management. Proceedings of the / I (IV) International scientific-practical conference held in the Moscow State University for Psychology & Education from 23 to 25 April of 2013. Part 1]. M.: MGPPU, 2013. URL: https://psyjournals.ru/social_economical_psychological_/issue/63145.shtml (Accessed: 24.02.2019).
  19. Khoroshilov D.A., Balashova E.Yu. Kachestvennye metody v sotsial'noi i klinicheskoi psikhologii: prolegomeny k mezhdistsiplinarnomu dialogu [Qualitative methods in social and clinical psychology: Prolegomena to interdisciplinary dialogue]. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo [Social psychology and society], 2018, is. 9, no. 3, pp. 21–30. doi:10.17759/sps.2018090303 (In Russ., Abstr. in Engl.).
  20. Chernov A.Yu. Metodologicheskoe vvedenie v problemu kachestvennykh metodov [Methodological introduction to the problem of qualitative methods]. Metodologiya i istoriya psikhologii [Methodology and history of psychology], 2007, is. 2, no. 1, pp. 118–129. (In Russ., Abstr. in Engl.).
  21. Shestopal E.B. Obrazy Evrosoyuza v Rossii: problemy vospriyatiya [The Images of the EU in Russia: problems of perception]. E.B. Shestopal, V.A. Gubchenko, Sh.Z. Dzhamaludinov, K.B. Dzhgamadze, I.A. Tumysov. Polis [Polis], 2016, no. 3, pp. 12–24. (In Russ., Abstr. in Engl.).
  22. Andreouli E., Howarth C. Everyday cosmopolitanism in representations of Europe among young Romanians in Britain. Sociology, 2018. (Early Access). URL: http://oro.open.ac.uk/54689/1/Andreouli%20%26%20Howarth%20cosmopolitanism_Sociology2018.pdf (Accessed: 03.02.2019).
  23. Bodycott P. Choosing a higher education study abroad destination: What mainland Chinese parents and students rate as important. Journal of Research in International Education, 2007, no 8, pp. 349–373.
  24. Breakwell G.M. Integrating paradigms, methodological implications. In Empirical approaches to social representations, ed. G.M. Breakwell and D.V. Canter, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993, pp. 180–201.
  25. Creswell J.W. Qualitative inquiry and research design:Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1997. 450 р.
  26. Cubillo J.M., Sánchez J., Cerviño J. International students’ decisionmaking process. International Journal of Educational Management, 2006, no. 20, pp. 101–115.
  27. Fombona J., Rodríguez C., Sevillano M.A.P. The Motivational Factor of Erasmus Students at the University. International Education Studies, 2013, vol. 6, no. 4., pp.1–9.
  28. Giddens A. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1984. 400 p.
  29. Goregenli M. Еurope in mind: social representations of Turkey-Europe relations in case of Turkish university students. European Journal of Geography,2013, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 36–47.
  30. Losito B., Agrusti G., Damiani V., Schulz W. Young People's Perceptions of Europe in a Time of Change IEA. International Civic and Citizenship Education Study 2016. European Report. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). 2017.
  31. Maner J.K., Miller S.L., Moss J.H., Jennifer L., Plant E.A. Motivated social categorization: Fundamental motives enhance people's sensitivity to basic social categories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2012, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 70–83.
  32. Minescu A., Hagendoorn L., Poppe E. Types of Identification and Intergroup Differentiation in the Russian Federation. Journal of Social Issues, 2008, vol. 64, no. 2, p. 321.
  33. Staerklé C., Clémence A., Spini D. Social Representations: A Normative and Dynamic Intergroup Approach. Political Psychology, 2011, no. 32, pp. 759–768.
  34. Starks H., Trinidad S.B. Choose Your Method: A Comparison of Phenomenology, Discourse Analysis, and Grounded Theory. Qualitative Health Research, 2007, no 17(10), pp. 1372–80
  35. Tarrant M., Dazeley S., Cottom T. Social categorization and empathy for outgroup members. British journal of social psychology, 2009, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 427–446.
  36. Vala J., Garcia-Marques L., Gouveia-Pereira M. & Lopes D. Validation of polemical social representations: introducing the intergroup differentiation of heterogeneity. Social Science Information, 1998, vol. 37, no.3, pp.469–492. doi.org/10.1177/053901898037003006
  37. Vedel A. Big Five personality group differences across academic majors: A systematic review. Personality and Individual Differences, 2016, no. 92, pp. 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.12.011

Information About the Authors

Oleg E. Khukhlaev, PhD in Psychology, Assistant Professor, Jewish Museum and Tolerance Center, Acre, Israel, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4620-9534, e-mail: huhlaevoe@mgppu.ru

Marina Y. Chibisova, PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor, Chair of Social Pedagogy and Psychology, Faculty of Pedagogics and Psychology, Moscow Pedagogical State University, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8174-6001, e-mail: marina_jurievna@mail.ru

Shushanik A. Usybyan, UMR Specialist of the International Relations Department of MSPPU, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Post-Graduate Student of the Moscow State Psychological and Pedagogical University (MSPPU), Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4427-6677, e-mail: usubyansha@mgppu.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 1408
Previous month: 19
Current month: 1

Downloads

Total: 440
Previous month: 2
Current month: 2