Skip to Main Content

Social Psychology and Society
2015. Vol. 6, no. 2, 8–21
ISSN: 2221-1527 / 2311-7052 (online)

Modern Foreign Research in Creativity: The Social Psychological Aspect

3246

N.V. Meshkova

PDF (RUS)
Online translation in english
GS
Information
in Google Scholar

Abstract

The paper provides a review of modern foreign studies on social psychological aspects of creativity. It focuses on the explorations of environmental (e.g. family, culture, education and workplace environments) and situational factors that help unleash creative potential of an individual and discusses cultural aspects of concepts of creativity. Special attention is paid to the studies that explore the relationship between situations, individual differences and creativity. As it is revealed, negative situational factors (such as threats, time limits, fear of death and nostalgia) may actually have a positive impact on creativity. Also, the paper highlights the difficulties concerning the assessment of creative potential as well as of creative outcome.

General Information

Keywords: creativity, creative potential, development of creativity, organized creativity, social psychology of creativity, evaluation of creative product, creativity assessment

Journal rubric: Theoretical Research

Article type: scientific article

For citation: Meshkova N.V. Modern Foreign Research in Creativity: The Social Psychological Aspect. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo = Social Psychology and Society, 2015. Vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 8–21. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Кондратьев М.Ю., Мешкова Н.В. Социально-психологические аспекты работы с одаренными учащимися: диагностико-исследовательский инструментарий, алго­ритм интерпретации эмпирики и принципы коррекционной работы: учеб.-метод. по­собие. М.: МГППУ, 2012. 100 с. / Kondrat'ev M.Yu., Meshkova N.V. Sotsial'no-psikho­logicheskie aspekty raboty s odarennymi uchashchimisya: diagnostiko-issledovatel'skii instrumentarii, algoritm interpretatsii empiriki i printsipy korrektsionnoi raboty. Uchebno-metodicheskoe posobie. Moscow: MGPPU, 2012. 100 p.
  2. Мешкова Н.В., Кондратьев М.Ю. Системная работа в сфере образования с одарен­ными детьми и подростками: социально-психологическая составляющая // Соци­альная психология и общество. 2012. № 1. С. 5—25. / Meshkova N.V., Kondra­tyev M.Yu. Working with Gifted Children and Adolescents within the Educational System: A Social Psychological Component // Sotsial'naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo, 2012, no. 1, pp. 5—25.
  3. Рабочая концепция одаренности. [Электронный ресурс]. 2003. URL: http://psych­lib.ru/mgppu/rko/rko-001-.htm (дата обращения 13.10.2014) / Rabochaya kontsept­siya odarennosti, 2003. [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://psychlib.ru/mgppu/rko/rko­001-.htm (Accessed 13.10.2014).
  4. Bender S.W. , Nibbelink B.L., Towner­Thyrum E., Vredenburg D. Defining Characteristics of Creative Women // Creativity Research Journal. 2013. Vol. 25. № 1. P. 38—47. DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2013.752190/
  5. BRICS & Emerging Economies Rankings 2015 [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http:// www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2015/brics-and-emerging­economies (дата обращения 30.12.14).
  6. BRICS & Emerging Economies Rankings methodology [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2015/brics-and­emerging-economies/methodology (дата обращения 30.12.14).
  7. Caroff X., Lubart T. Multidimensional Approach to Detecting Creative Potential in Managers // Creativity Research Journal. 2012. Vol. 24. № 1. P. 13—20. DOI: 10.1080/ 10400419.2012.652927/
  8. Cropley A. Creativity: A Social Approach // Roeper Review. 2006 Spring. Vol. 28. Issue3. P. 125—130.
  9. Cropley D., Cropley A. Elements of a universal aesthetic of creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics // Creativity and the Arts. 2008. № 2, Р. 155—161. DOI: 10.1037=1931-3896. 2.3.155/
  10. Davis G.A., Subkoviak M.J. Multidimensional analysis of a personality-based test of creative potential // Journal of Educational Measurement. 2005. Vol. 12. № 1. P. 37—43. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1975.tb01007.x.
  11. George J.M , Zhou J. Dual tuning in a supportive context: joint contributions of posi­tive mood, negative mood and supervisory behaviors to employee creativity. Academy of Management Journal. 2007. Vol. 50. №. 3. Р. 605—622.
  12. Gino F., Wiltermuth S. Evil genius? How dishonesty can lead to greater creativity // Psychological Science. 2014. Vol. 25. № 4. Р. 973—981.
  13. Gu J., Zhang Y., Liu H. Importance of social capital to student creativity within high­er education in China // Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2014. № 12. Р. 14—25.
  14. Hennessey B.A. The social psychology of creativity // Scand. J. Educ. Res. 2003. № 47. P. 253—71.
  15. 15. Hennessey B.A., Amabile T. M. Creativity. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2010. № 61. Р. 569—98.
  16. Hester K.S., Robledo I.C., Barrett J.D., et al. Causal Analysis to Enhance Creative Problem-Solving: Performance and Effects on Mental Models // Creativity Research Journal. 2012. Vol. 24. № 2—3. P. 115—133. DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2012.677249.
  17. Hsu M.L.A., Fan H.­L. Organizational Innovation Climate and Creative Outcomes: Exploring the Moderating Effect of Time Pressure // Creativity Research Journal. 2010. Vol. 22(4). P. 378—386.
  18. Kaufman J.C., Baer J. Beyond New and Appropriate: Who Decides What Is Creati­ve? // Creativity Research Journal. 2012. Vol. 24. № 1. P. 83—91. DOI: 10.1080/104004 19.2012.649237.
  19. Kharkhurin A.V. Creativity. 4in1: Four-Criterion Construct of Creativity // Creati­vity Research Journal. 2014. Vol. 26 (3). P. 338—352. DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2014.9 29424.
  20. Kim T., Hon A., Lee D. Proactive Personality and Employee Creativity: The Effects of Job Creativity Requirement and Supervisor Support for Creativity // Creativity Research Journal. 2010. Vol. 22(1). P. 37—45.
  21. Lau S., Cheung P.C., Lubart T., et al. Bicultural Effects on the Creative Potential of Chinese and French Children // Creativity Research Journal. 2013. Vol. 25. № 1. P. 109—118. DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2013.752281/
  22. Lebuda I., Karwowski M. Tell Me Your Name and I'll Tell You How Creative Your Work Is: Author's Name and Gender as Factors Influencing Assessment of Products' Creativity in Four Different Domains // Creativity Research Journal. 2013. Vol. 25. № 1. P. 137—142. DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2013.752297.
  23. Lovelace J.B., Hunter S.T. Charismatic, Ideological, and Pragmatic Leaders' Influence on Subordinate Creative Performance Across the Creative Process // Creativity Rese­arch Journal. 2013. Vol. 25. № 1. P. 59—74. DOI:10.1080/10400419.2013.752228.
  24. Madjar N., Oldham G.R. Task rotation and polychronicity: effects on individuals' cre­ativity // Hum. Perform. 2006. Vol. 19. № 1. P. 17—31.
  25. National research center on the gifted and talented [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.gifted.uconn.edu/nrcgt/nrconlin.html#03182 (дата обращения 11.12.2014)
  26. Paletz, Peng, Li In the World or in the Head: External and Internal Implicit Theories of Creativity // Creativity Research Journal. 2011. Vol. 23(2). P. 83—98.
  27. Plucker J.A. What Educators and Parents Need to Know About Fostering Creativity [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.gifted.uconn.edu/nrcgt/reports/Trifolds/ A9507P.pdf (дата обращения 11.12.2014).
  28. Rasulzada F., Dackert I. Organizational Creativity and Innovation in Relation to Psychological Well-Being and Organizational Factors // Creativity Research Journal. 2009. Vol. 21(2—3). P. 191—198.
  29. Routledge C., Arndt J., Vess M., Sheldon K. The life and death of creativity: The effects of self versus other-oriented behavior on creative expression after mortality salience // Motivation and Emotion. 2008. Vol. 32. P. 331—338.
  30. Routledge С., Jacob Juhl J. The creative spark of death: The effects of mortality salience and personal need for structure on creativity // Motivation and Emotion. 2012. Vol. 36. P. 478—482. DOI 10.1007/s11031-011-9274-1.
  31. Runco M.A., Cramond B., Pagnani A.R. Gender and creativity / J.C. Chrisler, D.R. McCreary (eds.) // Handbook of Gender Research in Psychology // Springer Science+ Business Media, 2010. Р. 343—358. DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-1465-1_17.
  32. Streicher B., Jonas E., Maier G.W. et al. Procedural Fairness and Creativity: Does Voice Maintain People's Creative Vein Over Time? // Creativity Research Journal. 2012. Vol. 24. № 4. P. 358—363. DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2012.730334.
  33. Walton A.P., Kemmelmeier M. Creativity in Its Social Context: The Interplay of Organizational Norms, Situational Threat, and Gender // Creativity Research Journal. 2012. Vol. 24. № 2—3. P. 208—219. DOI:10.1080/10400419.2012.677345.
  34. Wesnousky A.E. et al. Holding a silver lining theory: When negative attributes height­en performance // Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2015. № 57. Р. 15—22.
  35. Westwood R., Low D.R. The multicultural muse: Culture, creativity and innovation // International Journal of Cross Cultural Management. 2003. № 3. P. 235—259. DOI: 10.1177=14705958030032006.
  36. Wu J.J., Albanese D. Asian creativity, chapter one: Creativity across three Chinese societies // Thinking Skills and Creativity. 2010. № 5. P. 150—154.
  37. Ye S., Ngan R.Y.L., Hui A.N.N. The State, Not the Trait, of Nostalgia Increases Creativity // Creativity Research Journal. 2013. Vol. 25(3). P. 317—323. DOI: 10.1080/ 10400419.2013.813797.
  38. Zhou G. The quality investigation of the PhD candidate education in China. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press. 2010.
  39. Zitek E.M., Vincent L.C. Deserve and diverge: Feeling entitled makes people more cre­ative // Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2015. № 56. Р. 242—248.

 

Information About the Authors

Natalia V. Meshkova, PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor, Chair of Theoretical Foundations of Social Psychology, Faculty of Social Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3965-9382, e-mail: nmeshkova@yandex.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 4462
Previous month: 28
Current month: 1

Downloads

Total: 3246
Previous month: 3
Current month: 1