Moral Foundations as Factors of Socio-Economic Expectations of Russians

58

Abstract

Objective. Analysis of the relationship of socio-economic expectations of Russians with moral foundations and socio-demographic characteristics.
Background. Moral foundations theory has proved to be a very fruitful approach to the analysis of psychological factors of political views and preferences, but the problem of the relations between moral foundations and socio-economic expectations has not been considered in past studies.
Study design. A correlation design was used, the data were obtained in a survey of a representative sample of Russian citizens.
Participants. The sample includes 1600 residents of 82 regions of Russia surveyed by the Institute of Psychology of RAS and VCIOM (Russia Public Opinion Research Center) in February 2023, 55% of men and 45% of women aged 18 to 93 years.
Measurements. A demographic questionnaire, moral foundations questionnaire and a questionnaire compiled for this study to measure socio-economic expectations, measuring expectations of: social support, military victories and militarization of public life, justice, economic growth and consumer expectations. Results. It is established that the expectations of military victories and placing the economy and public life on a war-footing are largely determined by the commitment to ethics of community, the ethics of autonomy supports the expectations of justice and economic growth. Expectations of social support depend on both the ethics of autonomy and the ethics of community. Adherence to the "liberty" moral foundation is combined with a decrease in military expectations and an increase in consumer expectations regarding the availability of goods and services. Moral foundations mediate the relationship of expectations with socio-demographic factors: age, gender, education, income, type of settlement. This is most evident in the relatively large positive effect of age on expectations of military victories which is completely mediated by the higher ethics of community among older people.
Conclusions. The ethics of community, the ethics of autonomy and the "liberty" moral foundation not only reveal the psychological basis of political and ideological preferences, but also largely explain the social ideals of citizens expressed in their specific socio-economic expectations.

General Information

Keywords: socio-economic expectations; the image of the country’s future; socio-demographic factors; moral foundations; ethics of autonomy; ethics of community; liberty

Journal rubric: Empirical Research

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2023140409

Received: 03.10.2023

Accepted:

For citation: Sychev O.A., Nestik T.A. Moral Foundations as Factors of Socio-Economic Expectations of Russians. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo = Social Psychology and Society, 2023. Vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 135–155. DOI: 10.17759/sps.2023140409. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Ledovaya Ya.A., Tikhonov R.V., Bogolyubova O.N., Kazennaya E.V., Sorokina Yu.L. Otchuzhdenie moral'noi otvetstvennosti: psikhologicheskii konstrukt i metody ego izmereniya [Moral Disengagement: The Psychological Construct and its Measurement]. Vestnik St. Peterburgskogo universiteta. Psikhologiya = Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Series 16. Psychology and Education, 2016, no. 4, pp. 23–39. DOI:10.21638/11701/spbu16.2016.402 (In Russ.).
  2. Nevryuev A.N., Sarieva I.R. Kak uznat', kto i pochemu (ne) odobryaet voinu? Sovremennye issledovaniya otnosheniya k voine [How do you know who (dis)approves of war and why? Modern Studies of Attitudes to War]. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya = Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 2022. Vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 80–93. DOI:10.17759/jmfp.2022110108 (In Russ.).
  3. Nestik T.A. Sotsial'nyi optimizm rossiyan v usloviyakh krizisa: rezul'taty longityudnogo issledovaniya [Social Optimism of Russians in a Crisis: Results of a Longitudinal Study]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal = Psychological Journal, 2023. Vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 5–17. DOI:10.31857/S020595920026152-3 (In Russ.).
  4. Petukhov V.V. Ideino-politicheskie predpochteniya rossiyan: smena diskursa [Ideological and Political Preferences of the Russians: Changing of the Discourse]. Sotsiologicheskaya nauka i sotsial'naya praktika = Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika, 2020. Vol. 8, no. 4(32), pp. 25–43. DOI:10.19181/snsp.2020.8.4.7654 (In Russ.).
  5. Sychev O.A., Nestik T.A. Moral'nye osnovaniya styda i gordosti za svoyu stranu [Moral Foundations for the Feelings of Shame and Pride Regarding the Native Country]. Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Psikhologiya i pedagogika = RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics, 2022. Vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 528–549. DOI:10.22363/2313-1683-2022-19-3-528-549 (In Russ.).
  6. Sychev O.A. Teoriya moral'nykh osnovanii: sovremennyi vzglyad na psikhologicheskie faktory politicheskikh ubezhdenii [Moral Foundations Theory: Modern View on the Psychological Factors of Political Beliefs]. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo = Social Psychology and Society, 2023. Vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 5–22. DOI:10.17759/sps.2023140101 (In Russ.).
  7. Atari M., Haidt J., Graham J., Koleva S., Stevens S.T., Dehghani M. Morality Beyond the WEIRD: How the Nomological Network of Morality Varies Across Cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Advance online publication, 2023. DOI:10.1037/pspp0000470
  8. Bandalos D.L., Finney S.J. Factor Analysis: Exploratory and Confirmatory. In Hancock G.R., Stapleton L.M., Mueller R.O. (eds.). The Reviewer’s Guide to Quantitative Methods in the Social Sciences. New York, London: Routledge, 2018, pp. 98–122.
  9. Castilla-Estévez D., Blázquez-Rincón D. Age and Moral Foundations: A Meta-Analytic Approach. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 2021. Vol. 24, pp. e41. DOI:10.1017/SJP.2021.35
  10. Erceg N., Galić Z., Bubić A. The psychology of economic attitudes–moral foundations predict economic attitudes beyond socio-demographic variables. Croatian Economic Survey, 2018. Vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 37–70. DOI:10.15179/ces.20.1.2
  11. Friesen A. Generational Change? The Effects of Family, Age, and Time on Moral Foundations. The Forum, 2019. Vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 121–140. DOI:10.1515/for-2019-0005
  12. Graham J., Haidt J., Nosek B.A. Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2009. Vol. 96, no. 5, pp. 1029–1046. DOI:10.1037/a0015141
  13. Graham J., Nosek B.A., Haidt J., Iyer R., Koleva S., Ditto P.H. Mapping the Moral Domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2011. Vol. 101, pp. 366–385. DOI:10.1037/a0021847
  14. Hadarics M., Kende A. Moral foundations of positive and negative intergroup behavior: Moral exclusion fills the gap. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 2018. Vol. 64, pp. 67–76. DOI:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2018.03.006
  15. Hadarics M., Kende A. The Dimensions of Generalized Prejudice within the Dual-Process Model: the Mediating Role of Moral Foundations. Current Psychology, 2018. Vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 731–739. DOI:10.1007/s12144-016-9544-x
  16. Harper C.A., Hogue T.E. The role of intuitive moral foundations in Britain’s vote on EU membership. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 2019. Vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 90–103. DOI:10.1002/casp.2386
  17. Iyer R., Koleva S., Graham J., Ditto P., Haidt J. Understanding libertarian morality: The psychological dispositions of self-identified libertarians. PloS ONE, 2012. Vol. 7, no. 8, pp. e42366. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0042366
  18. Kenny D.A. Measuring Model Fit. URL: http://www.davidakenny.net/cm/fit.htm (Accessed 22.08.2020).
  19. Kertzer J.D., Powers K.E., Rathbun B.C., Iyer R. Moral Support: How Moral Values Shape Foreign Policy Attitudes. The Journal of Politics, 2014. Vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 825–840. DOI:10.1017/S0022381614000073
  20. Kivikangas J.M., Fernández-Castilla B., Järvelä S., Ravaja N., Lönnqvist J.-E. Moral foundations and political orientation: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 2021. Vol. 147, no. 1, pp. 55–94. DOI:10.1037/bul0000308
  21. Koleva S.P., Graham J., Iyer R., Ditto P.H., Haidt J. Tracing the threads: How five moral concerns (especially Purity) help explain culture war attitudes. Journal of Research in Personality, 2012. Vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 184–194. DOI:10.1016/j.jrp.2012.01.006
  22. Low M., Wui M.G.L. Moral Foundations and Attitudes Towards the Poor. Current Psychology, 2016. Vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 650–656. DOI:10.1007/s12144-015-9333-y
  23. Mueller R.O., Hancock G.R. Structural Equation Modeling. In Hancock G.R., Stapleton L.M., Mueller R.O. (eds.). The Reviewer’s Guide to Quantitative Methods in the Social Sciences. New York, London: Routledge, 2018, pp. 445–456.
  24. Passini S., Morselli D. Construction and Validation of the Moral Inclusion/Exclusion of Other Groups (MIEG) Scale. Social Indicators Research, 2017. Vol. 134, no. 3, pp. 1195–1213. DOI:10.1007/s11205-016-1458-3
  25. Strupp-Levitsky M., Noorbaloochi S., Shipley A., Jost J.T. Moral “foundations” as the product of motivated social cognition: Empathy and other psychological underpinnings of ideological divergence in “individualizing” and “binding” concerns. PLOS ONE, 2020. Vol. 15, no. 11, pp. e0241144. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0241144
  26. Watkins M. Exploratory Factor Analysis: A Guide to Best Practice. Journal of Black Psychology, 2018. Vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 219–246. DOI:10.1177/0095798418771807
  27. Welsch H. Moral Foundations and Voluntary Public Good Provision: The Case of Climate Change. Ecological Economics, 2020. Vol. 175, pp. 106696. DOI:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106696
  28. Yalçındağ B., Özkan T., Cesur S., Yilmaz O., Tepe B., Piyale Z.E., Biten A.F., Sunar D. An Investigation of Moral Foundations Theory in Turkey Using Different Measures. Current Psychology, 2019. Vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 440–457. DOI:10.1007/s12144-017-9618-4

 

Information About the Authors

Oleg A. Sychev, PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor, Senior Researcher of Research Departament, Shukshin Altai State University for Humanities and Pedagogy, Biysk, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0373-6916, e-mail: osn1@mail.ru

Timofey A. Nestik, Doctor of Psychology, professor, Head of the Laboratory of Social and Economic Psychology, Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Senior Researcher, Department of Personality Psychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1410-4762, e-mail: nestik@ipras.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 124
Previous month: 32
Current month: 12

Downloads

Total: 58
Previous month: 9
Current month: 8