Russian Psychological Issues PsyJournals.ru
OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS
JournalsTopicsAuthorsEditor's Choice For AuthorsAbout PsyJournals.ruContact Us

  Previous issue (2019. Vol. 15, no. 2)

Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)

Included in Scopus

CrossRef

Cultural-Historical Psychology

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

ISSN (printed version): 1816-5435

ISSN (online): 2224-8935

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17759/chp

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Started in 2005

Published quarterly

Free of fees
Open Access Journal

Affiliated ISCAR

 

Phenomena of Action Constructing Method 819

Egorova A.A., Junior Research Fellow, Psychology of Junior Schoolchildren Laboratory, Psychological Institute of the Russian Academy of Education, Moscow, Russia, ayegorova@yandex.ru
Abstract
One of the central questions of the theory of training is the problem of construction of common mode of actions and its allocation. It can be hypothesized that a common mode of actions is both a mean to detect the hidden properties of an object, but also constructing means of working with one's own vision of that object. This article presents an experimental situation that allows showing the phenomenon of mode of actions as constructing means of working with one's own vision. The study was conducted on 3rd and 6th graders in a general education school. The following conclusions were made. These kinds of methods are sufficient to distinguish two types of attitudes (orientations): orientation on construction of mode of action and orientation to solve specific practical tasks. The deliberate amplification and display of one's own sense of actions with all sorts of means, including sign-oriented, may indicate the construction of mode of action.

Keywords: Theory of Training Activity, Theoretical Thinking, Common Mode of Action, Specific Practical Task, Tool, Sense of Own Action

Column: Empirical Research

For Reference

References
    1. Gal'perin P. Ya. Lekcii po psihologii.М., 2002.
    2. Gordeeva N. D., Zinchenko V. P. Funkcional'naya struktura deistviya. M., 1983.
    3. Davydov V. V. Deyatel'nostnaya teoriya myshleniya. M., 2005.
    4. Zhulanova I. V. Produktivnoe deistvie v postroenii iskusstvennyh ponyatii: Dis. ... kand. psyhol. nayk. M.; Volgograd, 1998.
    5. Zaporozhec A. V. Izbr. psihol. trudy: V 2 t. M., 1986.
    6. Podd'yakov N. N. Myshlenie doshkol'nika. M., 1977.
    7. Shorohov E. V. (red.) Osnovnye napravleniya issledovanii psihologii myshleniya v kapitalisticheskih stranah. М., 1966.
    8. El'konin B. D. Deistvie kak edinica razvitiya // Voprosy psihologii. 2004. № 1.
    9. El'konin B. D. Ideal'naya forma, stroenie deistviya, soderzhanie obrazovaniya // Materialy VII Vserossiiskoi konferencii «Pedagogika razvitiya: sootnoshenie ucheniya i obucheniya». М., 2000.
    10. El'konin B. D. Probnoe deistvie v oposredstvovanii i razvitii. Rukopis'. M., 2007.
    11. El'konin D. B. Izbr. psihol. trudy. M., 1989.
comments powered by Disqus
 
About PsyJournals.ru

© 2007–2019 Portal of Russian Psychological Publications. All rights reserved

PsyJournals.ru in Russian

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Catalogue of academic journals in psychology & education MSUPE

Creative Commons License

RSS Psyjournals at facebook Psyjournals at Twitter Psyjournals at Youtube Яндекс.Метрика