Russian Psychological Issues PsyJournals.ru
OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS
JournalsTopicsAuthorsEditor's Choice About PsyJournals.ruContact Us

  Previous issue (2017. Vol. 13, no. 2)

Web of Science PsycINFO (American Psychological Society) EBSCO Academic Search International database Ulrich’s Periodicals Directory DOAJ ERIH PLUS Higher Attestation Commission Russian Science Citation Index VINITI Database RAS
CrossRef

Cultural-Historical Psychology

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

ISSN (printed version): 1816-5435

ISSN (online): 2224-8935

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17759/chp

Started in 2005

Published quarterly

Free of fees
Open Access Journal

Affiliated ISCAR

 

Towards cultural-historical and dialogical writing research – some methodological considerations

Karsten A., Postgraduate Student, Institute of General and structural linguistics, University of Munich, M.A., Munich, Germany, mail@andreakarsten.de
Abstract
Based on a cultural-historical and dialogical conceptualization of thinking and speech as formulated in Soviet psychology and linguistics of the 1920s and 1930s, this article seeks to reflect upon a congruent way of investigating writing as a cognitive and communicative activity. What has to be taken into account when developing a methodology for writing research from a cultural-historical and dialogical perspective? Firstly, writing is not separated from other forms of speech activity like interpersonal and intrapersonal speech. Thus, inner dialogue and the addressed character of writing become crucial notions to be methodologically considered. Secondly, contrary to current writing research traditions such as literacy studies and studies of the writing process in cognitive psychology, both individual writing processes and socio-cultural writing practices as well as their relationship must be considered. These reflections lead towards the conclusion that writing is not fully accessible to external observation or to introspection. In consequence, a suggestion of a methodological approach is given, inspired by the activity theoretically informed method of auto-confrontation. The proposed method consists of two phases: a) videotaping of a writing episode and b) co-analysis of the videotaped writing episode in dialogue between writer and researcher. The second phase transfers the writing activity into a new context where understanding it becomes possible. The co-analysis makes involved positions audible: positions of the writer and of the researcher, of real and imagined readers as well as intersubjective and community-related positions. Finally, implications of the proposed research setting are discussed and evaluated with regard to the theoretical grounding. An instance of the methodology to be sketched in this article was developed in the context of the author’s dissertation project in preparation at Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität in Munich, Germany with the working title «Writing processes and writing practices. A conceptualization from a dialogical perspective». The project is funded by scholarships of Universität Bayern e.V. and Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität.

Keywords: writing; writing research; dialogue; dialogical perspective; auto-confrontation

Column: Theory and Methodology

For Reference

References
  1. Bakhtin M. M. Forms of Time and of the Chronotope in the Novel. In M. Holquist (Ed.), The Dialogic Imagination. Four Essays by M. M. Bakhtin. [Translated by C. Emerson & M. Holquist]. Austin, 1937–1938/1981.
  2. Bakhtin M. M. The Problem of Speech Genres. In C. Emerson & M. Holquist (Ed.), Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. [Translated by V.W. McGee]. Austin, 1953-54/1986.
  3. Bakhtin M. M. The Problem of the Text in Linguistics, Philology, and the Human Sciences: An Experiment in Philosophical Analysis. In C. Emerson & M. Holquist (Ed.), Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. [Translated by V.W. McGee]. Austin, 1959–1961/1986.
  4. Ball A. F., Freedman S. W. (Ed.) Bakhtinian Perspectives on Language, Literacy, and Learning. Cambridge, 2004.
  5. Bertau M.-C. Anreden, Erwidern, Verstehen. Elemente einer Psycholinguistik der Alterität. Habilitation thesis. Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich. 2009.
  6. Bertau M.-C. Spuren des Gesprächs in innerer Sprache. Versuch einer Analyse der dialogischen Anteile des lauten Denkens // Sprache & Kognition Vol. 18. № 1/2. p. 4-19. 1999.
  7. Brossard M. Pratiques d’écrit, fonctionnements et développement cognitifs. In C. Moro, B. Schneuwly & M. Brossard (Ed.), Outils et signes. Perspectives actuel les de la théorie de Vygotski. Bern, 1997.
  8. Chenoweth N. A., Hayes J. R. The Inner Voice in Writing // Written Communication. Vol. 20. №. 1. p. 99-118. 2003.
  9. Clot Y. Travail et pouvoir d’agir. Paris, 2008.
  10. Clot Y. L’auto-confrontation croisée en analyse du travail - l’apport de la théorie bakhtinienne du dialogue. In L. Fillettaz & J. P. Bronckart (Ed.), L’analyse des actions et des discours en situation de travail. Concepts, méthodes et applications. Leuven, 2005.
  11. Clot Y., Faïta D. Genres et styles en analyse du travail. Concepts et methods // Revue Travailler. №. 4. p. 7-31. 2000.
  12. Clot Y. Faïta D., Fernandez G., Scheller L. Entretiens en auto-confrontation croisée: une méthode en clinique de l’activité // Education permanente Vol. 146. p. 17-25. 2001.
  13. Friedrich J. Die Apperzeptionsgebundenheit des Sprechens. Ein historischer Exkurs in die Diskussion um die innere Sprache. In M.-C. Bertau, A. Werani & G. Kegel (Ed.) Psycholinguistische Studien 2. Aachen, 2005.
  14. Friedrich J. The Use and Function of Dialogue in the Soviet-Russian Discourse of the 1920ies, especially with Yakubinsky and Vygotsky. In M.-C. Bertau & J. Friedrich (Ed.), Think about Language Dialogically – Understand Action Dialogically. 2005. Electronic document: http://epub.ub.uni-muenchen.de/2020/.
  15. Goody J. The Logic of Writing and the Organization of Society. Cambridge, 1986.
  16. Hayes J. R., Chenoweth N. A. Working Memory in an Editing Task // Written Communication. Vol. 24. № 4. p. 283-294. 2007.
  17. Hayes J. R., Flower L. S. Identifying the Organization of Writing Processes. In L.W. Gregg & E.R. Steinberg (Ed.), Cognitive Processes inWriting. Hillsdale, 1980.
  18. Hayes J. R. Flower L. S. The Dynamics of Composing: Making Plans and Juggling C,onstraints. In L.W. Gregg & E.R. Steinberg (Ed.), Cognitive Processes in Writing. Hillsdale, 1980.
  19. Hymes D. Introduction: Toward ethnographies of communication // American Anthropologist, Vol. 66. № 6. p. 1-34. 1964.
  20. Igland M.-A., Ongstad S. (Ed.) Special Issues on Norwegian Writing Research // Written Communication Vol. 19. № 3 & 4. 2002.
  21. Ivanova I. Le dialogue dans la lingustique soviétique des années 1920-1930 // Cahiers de l’ILSL. № 14. p. 157-182. 2003.
  22. [Jakubinsky] Jakubinskij L. P. Über die dialogische Rede. In K. Ehlich & K. Meng (Ed.), Die Aktualität des Verdrängten. Studien zur Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft im 20. Jahrhundert. [Translated by K. Hommel & K. Meng]. Heidelberg, 1923/2004.
  23. [Jakubinsky] Yakubinsky L. P. On Dialogic Speech // PMLA, Vol. 112. № 2. p. 243-256. 1923/1997. [Translated by M. Eskin]
  24. [Jakubinsky] Jakubinskij L. P. On Verbal Dialogue // Dispositio Vol. IV. № 11/12. p. 321-336. 1923/1979. [Translated by J.E. Knox]
  25. Knox J. E. Lev Jakubinskij as a Precursor to Modern Soviet Semiotics // Dispositio Vol. IV. № 11/12. p. 317-320. 1979.
  26. Levy C. M., Olive T. Real-time Studies in Writing Research: Progress and Prospects. In T. Olive & C.M. Levy (Ed.) Contemporary Tools and Techniques for Studying Writing. Dordrecht, 2001.
  27. Lysaker J. Reading, Writing, and the Transformation of Self: the Accomplishment of Literacy through the Lens of Dialogism // International Journal for Dialogical Science Fall. Vol. 2. № 1. p. 325-336. 2007.
  28. Nystrand M. The Structure of Written Communication. Studies in Reciprocity between Writers and Readers. Orlando, 1986.
  29. Olive T., Levy C. M. (Ed.). Contemporary Tools and Techniques for Studying Writing. Dordrecht, 2001.
  30. Ong W. Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. N.Y., 1982.
  31. Surd-Büchele S. & Karsten A. Vygotskijs Konzeption von Schreiben // ICHS-Journal Vol. 1. p. 15-42. 2010.
  32. Veresov N. Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD): the Hidden Dimension? 2004. Electronic document: http://nveresov.narod.ru/ZPD.pdf
  33. Voloshinov V. N. Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. [Translated by M. Ladislav & I.R. Titunik]. Cambridge, 1929/1986.
  34. Vygotsky L. S. Consciousness as a Problem in the Psychology of Behavior. In N. Veresov (Ed.), Undiscovered Vygotsky. Etudes on the Pre-history of Cultural-historical Psychology. [Translated by N. Veresov]. Frankfurt/Main, 1925/1999.
  35. Vygotsky L. S. The History and the Development of Higher Mental Functions. The Collected Works of L.S. Vygotsky, Vol. 4. [Translated by M.J. Hall]. N.Y., 1931/1997.
  36. Vygotsky L. S. Thought and Language. [Translated by A. Konzulin]. Cambridge, MA, 1934/1986.
  37. Werani A. Die Erforschung des inneren Sprechens – ein Ergebnis aus einer empirischen Studie // ICHS-Journal Vol. 1. p. 83-101. 2010.
comments powered by Disqus
 
About PsyJournals.ruLaureate of the XIV National psychological contest «Golden Psyche» at the results of 2012

© 1997–2017 Portal of Russian Psychological Publications. All rights reserved

PsyJournals.ru in Russian

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Catalogue of academic journals in psychology & education MSUPE NEW!

RSS Psyjournals at facebook Psyjournals at Twitter Webometrics Яндекс.Метрика