Russian Psychological Issues PsyJournals.ru
OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS
JournalsTopicsAuthorsEditor's Choice For AuthorsAbout PsyJournals.ruContact Us

  Previous issue (2019. Vol. 15, no. 2)

Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)

Included in Scopus

CrossRef

Cultural-Historical Psychology

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

ISSN (printed version): 1816-5435

ISSN (online): 2224-8935

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17759/chp

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Started in 2005

Published quarterly

Free of fees
Open Access Journal

Affiliated ISCAR

 

Is It Acceptable To Lie To a Murderer in Order To Prevent a Crime: An Analysis of Historical Polemic 982

Poddyakov A.N., PhD in Psychology, Professor, Faculty of Psychology, Department of General and Experimental Psychology, ,, State University — Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia, alpod@gol.ru
Abstract
The controversy about Kant's essay «On a Supposed Right to Tell Lies from Benevolent Motives» is discussed, where Kant justifies the idea: if a murderer asks a person where his friend is hiding in order to kill his friend, morality calls not to lie to a murder and tell the truth. The article argues that although the followers of this Kantian position are considered as absolutists, and its opponents — as relativists, the Kantians with a necessity perform a large-scale relativization of the truth maxima and often adopt even a more conformist position regarding deceit than Kant's opponents, the «relativists». We introduce the paradoxes of a «dear friend» and «Kant's generalized consequence for a variety of friends» that describe the contradictory positions of Kant supporters. The «absolutist» and «relativists» confrontation is interpreted as a polemic between the supporters of reductionist and holistic (integrated) methodological approaches taking into account that the methodological confrontation is intensified by the confrontation of moral values.

Keywords: Kant, lies, deception, the principle of truth, moral absolutisation and relativization, holism, reductionism.

Column: Discussions And Discourses

For Reference

References
  1. Apresyan R. G. Kommentarii k diskussii // Logos. 2008. № 5.
  2. Apresyan R. G. O prave lgat' // Logos. 2008. № 5.
  3. Artem'eva O. V. Ob opravdannosti lzhi iz chelovekolyu­biya // Logos. 2008. № 5.
  4. Vasil'ev V. V. Marginalii k rabote Kanta o mnimom prave na lozh' // Logos. 2008. № 5.
  5. Gloi K. Problema poslednego obosnovaniya dinami­cheskih sistem // Voprosy filosofii. 1994. № 3.
  6. Guseinov A. A. Chto govoril Kant, ili Pochemu nevoz­mozhna lozh' vo blago // Logos. 2008. № 5.
  7. Dubrovskii D. I. K voprosu o dobrodetel'nom obmane // Logos. 2008. № 5.
  8. Zubec O. P. Lozh' kak samoustranenie // Logos. 2008. № 5.
  9. Iskander F. Kroliki i udavy. [Elektronnyi resurs] URL: http://lib.ru/FISKANDER/kroliki.txt (data obrasheniya: 02.01.2010).
  10. Kalinnikov L. A. Kant v russkoi filosofskoi kul'ture. Kaliningrad, 2005.
  11. Kant I. Lekcii po etike. M., 2005.
  12. Kant I. Metafizika nravov v dvuh chastyah. Chast' I // Kant I. Soch. v 6 t. T. 4. Ch. 2. M., 1965.
  13. Kant I. O mnimom prave lgat' iz chelovekolyubiya // Kant I. Traktaty i pis'ma / Red. A. V. Gulyga. M., 1980.
  14. Kapustin B. G. Kritika kantovskoi kritiki «prava lgat'» // Logos. 2008. № 5.
  15. Kozeleckii Yu. Psihologicheskaya teoriya reshenii. M., 1979.
  16. Kuz'minov Ya. I., Yudkevich M. M. Kurs lekcii po insti­tucional'noi ekonomike. M., 2000.
  17. Lefevr V. A. Algebra sovesti. M., 2003.
  18. Lefevr V. A. Strategicheskie resheniya i moral' // Refleksivnye processy i upravlenie. 2002. Tom 2. № 1.
  19. Logos. 2008. № 5. Elektronnaya versiya: URL:http:// www.prognosis.ru/logos/5_2008.pdf (data obrasheniya: 02.01.2010).
  20. Malineckii G. Liniya Urana // Znanie — sila. 1996. № 8.
  21. Merezhkovskii D. S. Stihotvoreniya i poemy. SPb., 2000.
  22. Oizerman T. I. Kategoricheskii imperativ i absolyut­nost' zapreta na lozh' v etike Kanta // Logos. 2008. № 5.
  23. Podd'yakov A. N. Sravnitel'naya psihologiya razvitiya H. Vernera v sovremennom kontekste // Kul'turno-istori­cheskaya psihologii. 2007. № 1.
  24. Prigozhin I., Stengers I. Poryadok iz haosa: novyi dialog cheloveka s prirodoi. M., 1986.
  25. Prokof'ev A. V. Vybor v pol'zu men'shego zla i proble­ma granic moral'no dopustimogo // Eticheskaya mysl'. Vyp. 9. M.: IFRAN, 2009. S. 122—145.
  26. Prokof'ev A. V. Kant, obman, primenenie sily… // Logos. 2008. № 5.
  27. Rotenberg V. S. Obraz «Ya» i povedenie. [Elektronnyi resurs] URL: http://rjews.net/v_rotenberg/book.htm (data obrasheniya: 02.01.2010).
  28. Ruzavin G. I. Koncepcii sovremennogo estestvo­znaniya. M., 1999.
  29. Sidorova N. M. Kogda Kant budet uslyshan i skol'ko za eto nado zaplatit'? // Logos. 2008. № 5.
  30. Skripnik A. P. K probleme lzhi v etike I. Kanta // Logos. 2008. № 5.
  31. Solov'ev E. Yu. Chelovek pod doprosom (nelzhivost', pravdivost' i pravo na molchanie) // Logos. 2008. № 5.
  32. Yakovenko I. V chem oshibsya Hantington? (Monolog kul'torologa) // Znanie — sila. 2002. № 1.
  33. Yaroshevskii M. G. Social'nye i psihologicheskie koordi­naty nauchnogo tvorchestva // Voprosy filosofii. 1995. № 12.
  34. MacIntyre A. Truthfulness and Lies: What Can We Learn from Kant // MacIntyre A. Ethics and Politics: Selected Essays. Vol. 2. Cambridge, 2006.
comments powered by Disqus
 
About PsyJournals.ru

© 2007–2019 Portal of Russian Psychological Publications. All rights reserved

PsyJournals.ru in Russian

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Catalogue of academic journals in psychology & education MSUPE

Creative Commons License

RSS Psyjournals at facebook Psyjournals at Twitter Psyjournals at Youtube Яндекс.Метрика