Previous issue (2019. Vol. 15, no. 1)
Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)
Introducing Basic Concepts: In Search of the Missing Scaffolds
, Doctor in Psychology, leading researcher, Psychological Institute of the Russian Academy of Education, Moscow, Russia, firstname.lastname@example.orgObukhova O.L.
, Research Fellow, laboratory of primary school students psychology, Psychological Institute of the Russian Academy of Education, Moscow, Russia, email@example.comRyabinina L.A.
, Deputy Head, Center for Assessment of Quality in Education, Krasnoyarsk, Russia, firstname.lastname@example.orgShibanova N.A.
, Teacher, Moscow State School # 91, Moscow, Russia, email@example.com
What are the conditions for the intersection and mutual enrichment of two separate lines of development of conceptual thinking – those of everyday and scientific notions? We assume that such intersection would require at least two conditions. The first one is well known: it is modeling of essential properties of the subject under study. Educational models are providing hand-on actions of the young student with a theoretical content of the notion. The second condition is the motivational support for constructing educational models. This condition is not fulfilled as evidenced by the lack of students’ initiative in creating and using the educational models at the early stages of the introduction of scientific concepts. We expected the conceptual characters of educational games to complement scaffolding for bringing the initial concepts into the systematic school curricula?. On the one hand, these conceptual characters act according to the logic of the concept, on the other hand, they exist as the fairy-tale heroes. Our hypothesis is supported by the evidence from the formative experiments in grade one. When the conceptual characters became part of the lessons, learning became impregnated with feelings, imagination and initiative; in particular, the first-graders were building the learning models without any suggestions from their teacher. The assessment of these students showed that the introduction of the initial concepts with the help of conceptual characters significantly affected the very concepts thus developed; in particular, it promoted their attribution to the essential properties of the subject under study.
Aydarova L.I. Psikhologicheskie problemy obucheniya
mladshikh shkol’nikov russkomu yazyku [Psychological problems of teaching
Russian language to elementary school children]. Moscow: Pedagogika, 1978. 144
Bozhovich L.I. Psikhologicheskii analiz formalizma v
usvoenii shkol’nykh znanii [Psychological analysis of formalism in the
acquisition of school knowledge]. In Il’yasov I.I., Lyaudis V.Ya. (eds.),
Khrestomatiya po vozrastnoy i pedagogicheskoy psikhologii [Anthology
on age and pedagogical psychology]. Moscow: Publ. Mosk. un-ta, 1980, pp.
Bugrimenko E.A., Mikulina G.G., Savel’eva O.V., Zuckerman
G.A. Rukovodstvo po otsenke kachestva matematicheskikh i lingvisticheskikh
znaniy shkol’nikov [Guide to assess the quality of mathematical and linguistic
knowledge of schoolchildren]. Moscow: VNIK «Shkola», 1989. 88 p.
Vygotskiy L.S. Razvitie zhiteyskikh i nauchnykh ponyatiy v
shkol’nom vozraste [Development of everyday and scientific concepts at school
age]. In Vygotskii L.S., Pedagogicheskaya psikhologiya [Educational
psychology]. Moscow: Pedagogika, 1991, pp. 410—430.
Vygotskiy L.S. Myshlenie i rech’ [Thinking and Speech].
Sobranie sochineniy: v 6 t. T. 2. Problemy obshchey psikhologii
[Collected Works: in 6 vol. Vol. 2. Problems of general psychology].
Moscow: Pedagogika, 1982. 504 p.
Gal’perin P.Ya. Psikhologiya kak ob”ektivnaya nauka
[Psychology as an objective science]. Moscow: Publ. «In-t prakticheskoy
psikhologii», 1998. 480 p.
Gist H. Podderzhka prisvoeniya znaniy i Conceptual Change
v obuchenii. Strategiya obucheniya pri voskhozhdeniya ot abstraktnogo k
konkretnomu [Promotion of knowledge acquisition and conceptual change in
classroom. The strategy ascending from the abstract to the concrete].
Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya [Culturalhistorical
psychology], 2014. Vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 99—109. (In Russ., abstr. in
Davydov V.V. Teoriya razvivayushchego obucheniya [Theory
of developmental education]. Moscow: Intor, 1996. 544 p.
Davydov V.V., Elizarova N.V., Zuckerman G.A. Kommentarii
[Comments]. In Vygotskii L.S., Pedagogicheskaya psikhologiya
[Educational psychology]. Moscow: Pedagogika, 1991, pp. 450—469.
Kuznetsova M.I. Sistema kontrolya i otsenki
obrazovatel’nykh dostizheniy mladshikh shkol’nikov v sovremennoy nachal’noy
shkole [The system of monitoring and evaluation of educational achievements of
junior schoolchildren in modern elementary school]. Moscow: Ventana-Graf, 2013.
Liberman A.A. Sravnitel’nyy analiz sredstv formirovaniya
predmetnosti ponyatiy u mladshikh shkol’nikov. Diss. kand. psikhol. nauk.
[Comparative analysis of the means of formation of the objectivity of concepts
in elementary schoolchildren. Ph. D. (Psychology) Thesis]. Moscow, 1999. 168
Maleev A.L. Psikhologicheskaya diagnostika kachestva
znaniy uchashchikhsya. Avtiref. diss. kand. psikhol. nauk. [Psychological
diagnostics of the quality of knowledge of students. Ph. D. (Psychology)
Thesis]. Moscow, 1991. 22 p.
Mikulina G.G., Savel’eva O.V. K psikhologicheskoi otsenke
kachestva znaniy u mladshego shkol’nika [To the psychological assessment of the
quality of knowledge in the elementary schoolchildren]. Psikhologicheskaya
nauka i obrazovanie [Psychological Science and Education],
1997, no. 2, pp. 47—50. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
Repkin V.V., Levin V.A., Vostorgova E.V. Bukvar’
[ABC-book]. Moscow: Vita-Press, 2016. 112 p.
Rubtsov V.V., Margolis A.A., Telegin M.V.
Psikhologicheskoe issledovanie geneza i razvitiya zhiteyskikh ponyatiy v
usloviyakh uchebnogo dialoga (vtoroy etap) [Psychological Research on Genesis
and Development of Everyday Concepts in Educational Dialogue (Second Stage)].
Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie [Psychological Science and
Education], 2008, no. 2, pp. 61—69. (In Russ., abstr. in
Savel’eva O.V. Psikhologicheskie kriterii kachestva znaniy
mladshikh shkol’nikov (na matematicheskom materiale). Avtoref. diss. kand.
psikhol. nauk. [Psychological criteria of the quality of knowledge of
elementary schoolchildren (on mathematical material). Ph. D. (Psychology)
Thesis]. Moscow, 1989. 21 p.
Semenova M.A. Kriterii sformirovannosti ponyatiya
velichiny u mladshikh shkol’nikov [Criteria for the formation of the concept of
magnitude in elementary schoolchildren]. Voprosy psikhologii
[Psychology issues], 1985, no. 1, pp. 67—74.
Zuckerman G.A. Igra i uchenie: vstrecha dvukh vedushchikh
deyatel’nostey. [Play and Learning: How the Two Leading Activities Meet].
Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya [Cultural-historical
psychology], 2016. Vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 4—13. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
El’konin D.B. Intellektual’nye vozmozhnosti mladshikh
shkol’nikov i soderzhanie obucheniya [Intellectual abilities of elementary
schoolchildren and the content of education]. In El’konin D.B., Davydov V.V.
(eds.), Vozrastnye vozmozhnosti usvoeniya znaniya [Age abilities for
mastering knowledge]. Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 1966, pp. 13—53.
El’konin D.B. Bukvar’ [ABC-book]. Moscow: Prosveshchenie,
1994. 256 p.