Previous issue (2019. Vol. 15, no. 1)
Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)
Interpsychological Exists! 303
, Doctor of Psychology, leading researcher, Psychological Institute of the Russian Academy of Education, Moscow, Russia, email@example.comRyabinina L.A.
, Deputy Head, Center for Assessment of Quality in Education, Krasnoyarsk, Russia, firstname.lastname@example.orgChaban T.Y.
, Head of the Department for Education Quality Monitoring, Center for Education Quality Assessment, Kemerovo, Russia, email@example.comRomanova L.M.
, Specialist at the Department for Education Quality Monitoring, Center for Education Quality Assessment, Russia, firstname.lastname@example.org
Is there a joint, cooperative action taking place every time pupils do something in fours in a lesson, for instance, discuss the content of a text according to the task given by a teacher? Using clinical research of simple child-adult interactions, we explain how the following essential features of interpsychological action can be found in children’s activities: (1) a child’s initiative in solving the task (2) intersection of children’s initiatives upon the object of their activities (3) orientation of children’s individual actions both towards the object of their activities (in this case, the meaning of the text) and the partner (his/her understanding of the sought-for meaning) (4) unfinished, in-progress character of the ability to understand text in every child participating in the interaction (5) nonadditive character of the interaction outcome which exceeds the individual abilities of the participants (6) stability of the achieved outcome, its persistence in individual actions even outside the interaction (7) specially arranged activities of the adult participant of the interaction. At the project stage, the adult creates the focus in which the children’s initiatives can meet. In our case, it was a question to the text which implied reflective understanding that was only beginning to emerge in second-year pupils. At the stage of direct interaction, the adult (1) supports productive initiatives of the children, yet restraining from full participation in solving the task (2) protects the child community from unproductive conflicts arising due to violations of communicative norms.
Vygotskii L.S. Pedagogicheskaya psihologiya [Educational
psychology]. Moscow: Pedagogika, 1991. 480 p.
Guzman R.YA. Rol’ sovmestnoi deyatel’nosti v reshenii
uchebnyh zadach. [The role of cooperative activity in solving learning
problems]. Voprosy psikhologii [Problems of psychology],
1980, no. 3, pp. 133—136.
Davydov V.V. Teoriya razvivayushchego obucheniya [Theory
of developmental education]. Mosow: Intor, 1996. 542 p.
Korostylev A.YU. Psihologicheskie osobennosti organizacii
sovmestnogo uchebnogo deistviya shkol’nikov [Psychological features of the
organization of cooperative learning actions of schoolchildren]. Voprosy
psikhologii [Problems of psychology], 1980, no. 4, pp.
Kudina G.N., Novlyanskaya Z.N. Psihologo—pedagogicheskie
principy prepodavaniya literatury v nachal’noi shkole [Psychological and
pedagogical principles of teaching literature in primary school].Voprosy
psikhologii [Problems of psychology], 1989, no. 4, pp.
Poluyanov YU.A. Razvitie vzaimoponimaniya mezhdu det’mi v
uchebnoj deyatel’nosti [Development of mutual understanding between children in
educational activities]. In Davydov V.V. (ed.), Razvitie psihiki shkol’nikov
v processe uchebnoj deyatel’nosti [Psychological development of
schoolchildren in the learning process]. Moscow: NII OPP APN SSSR, 1983,
Rivina I.V. Zavisimost’ razvitiya uchebno—poznavatel’nyh
deшstvii mladshih shkol’nikov ot tipa kollektivnoi deyatel’nosti [Dependence of
development of learning and cognitive actions of elementary schoolchildren on
the type of collective activity]. Voprosy psikhologii [Problems of
psychology], 1987, no. 5, pp. 62—69.
Rubcov V.V. Organizaciya i razvitie sovmestnyh dejstvij u
detej v processe obucheniya [Organization and development of cooperative
actions among children in the learning process]. Moscow: Pedagogika, 1987. 160
Rubcov V.V. et al. Kommunikativno-orientirovannye
obrazovatel’nye sredy. Psihologiya proektirovaniya [Communicative-oriented
educational environments. Design Psychology]. Moscow: PI RAO, 1996. 157
Troickii YU.L. «Ponimanie» kak obrazovatel’naya
tekhnologiya [“Understanding” as an educational technology]. Universum:
Vestnik Gercenovskogo universiteta [Universum:Bulletin of Herzen
University], 2012, no. 1, pp. 66—72.
Federal’nyi gosudarstvennyi obrazovatel’nyi standart
nachal’nogo obshchego obrazovaniya v novoy redactsii [Elektronnyi resurs] [The
federal state educational standard of primary education in new edition]. URL:
Zuckerman G.A. Vidy obshcheniya v obucheniya [Types of
cooperation in education]. Tomsk: Peleng, 1993. 269 p.
Palincsar A.S., Brown A.L. Reciprocal teaching: Activities
to promote reading with your mind. In Harris T.L., Cooper E.J. (eds.),
Reading, thinking and concept development: Strategies for the classroom.
New York: The College Board. 1985, pp. 147—160.