Russian Psychological Issues PsyJournals.ru
OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS
JournalsTopicsAuthorsEditor's Choice For AuthorsAbout PsyJournals.ruContact Us

  Previous issue (2019. Vol. 6, no. 2)

CrossRef

Language and Text

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

ISSN (online): 2312-2757

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17759/langt

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Started in 2014

Published quarterly

Free of fees
Open Access Journal

 

Images of men and women in the Dagestan language picture of the world (based on the Rutul language) 110

Makhmudova S.M., Doctor of Philology, Doctor of Philology, head of Department of "Linguodidactics and intercultural communication" of the institute "Foreign languages, modern communications and management", MSUPE, Moscow, Russia, rutulsveta@mail.ru
Abstract
The autochthonous Dagestan languages belong to an ergative typology, in which the entire language system is subordinated to the reflection of the semantics of the subject’s activity / passivity, his participation / non-participation in the event happening with him or around him, the subject’s influence on the object, the activity / passivity of which is also controlled by the subject. At the same time, the subject himself can take shape in different cases, expressing his role in what is happening or produced by the event itself. The whole system of declination of the Rutul language is subordinated to the expression of the semantics of the subject's activity, the main semantic component of which is the principle of anthropocentrism. The article discusses the features of the reflection of the people's thinking and their ideas about the world in language, which imprint not only on the linguistic picture of the world, but also on the structure of the language itself.

Keywords: linguistic picture of the world, Dagestan languages, Rutul language, lexico-semantic classes of nouns, the image of a man, the image of a woman

Column: Intercultural Communication and Problems of Globalization: Psycho-, Socio- and Ethnolinguistics

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17759/langt.2019060119

For Reference

References
  1. Mahmudova S. M.  (1992) MyhaIbishdy misalabyr. (Rutul'skie poslovicy). Na rutul'skom yazyke. Mahachkala, Dagknigoizdat.
  2. Mahmudova S. M. ZHemchuzhiny rutul'skoj mysli. Mahachkala, 2014.
  3. Mahmudova S. M. O filosofskoj osnove somaticheskih frazeologizmov  v rutul'skom yazyke. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. № 1 (55), 2016, chast' 1. Tambov, izdatel'stvo  “Gramota“. Str.154-158.
  4. Mahmudova S.M. (2018) YAzykovaya reprezentaciya aksiologicheskoj dominanty koncepta «EHtika» («Abyr») v nacional'noj kartine mira rutulov. YAzyk i tekst. T. 5, № 2. Str. 75-81.
  5. Mokienko V. M. Zagadki russkoj frazeologii. M., 2005.
  6. Teliya V. N. (1993) Kul'turno-nacional'nye konnotacii frazeologizmov (ot mirovideniya k miroponimaniyu) // Slavyanskoe yazykoznanie. XI Mezhdunarodnyj s"ezd slavistov. M.: Nauka. S. 302-314.
  7. Teliya V. N.  (1996) Russkaya frazeologiya. Semanticheskij, pragmaticheskij i lingvokul'turologicheskij aspekty. M.: SHkola “YAzyki russkoj kul'tury”
comments powered by Disqus
 
About PsyJournals.ru

© 2007–2019 Portal of Russian Psychological Publications. All rights reserved

PsyJournals.ru in Russian

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Catalogue of academic journals in psychology & education MSUPE

Creative Commons License

RSS Psyjournals at facebook Psyjournals at Twitter Psyjournals at Youtube Яндекс.Метрика