Russian Psychological Issues PsyJournals.ru
OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS
JournalsTopicsAuthorsEditor's Choice For AuthorsAbout PsyJournals.ruContact Us

  Previous issue (2019. Vol. 6, no. 2)

CrossRef

Language and Text

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

ISSN (online): 2312-2757

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17759/langt

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Started in 2014

Published quarterly

Free of fees
Open Access Journal

 

Prometheus or Amirani. An updated study on the Pre-Greek substrate and its origins 44

Giampaolo T., Professor of linguistics, Padua State University, Italy
Philippos Kitselis, Professor of linguistics, Padua State University, Italy, gtardivo@google.com
Abstract
In the late 80s and early 90s, Colin Renfrew presented his Anatolian hypothesis. According to him, the agrarian revolution begun in Anatolia, and from there, it spread out in Europe. He supposed that these farmers were carriers of the Proto-Indo-European language, but his theory had weak support from Indo-European linguists. Some questions then arise: What language(s) was introduced in the Ægean islands and mainland Greece by these early farmers? Can we figure out the affiliations of the Minoan language? A different agrarian hypothesis will be shown in these pages, unrelated to the Indo-European and Semitic language families. It instead is featuring a new language family that encompasses the Ægean, Anatolia, Caucasus and the Near East.

Keywords: learning, behavior, motivation, conditioned response, trial and error, insight

Column: Problems of modern linguistics

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17759/langt.2019060307

For Reference

References
  1. Beekes, R., 2014. Pre-Greek: phonology, morphology, lexicon. Brill.
  2. Bennett, Emmett L., and Cyrus H. Gordon. 1968. Evidence for the Minoan Language: 110-118.
  3. Blevins, J. and Garrett, A., 2004. The evolution of metathesis in “Phonetically based phonology”, pp.117-156. Cambridge.
  4. Blevins, J. and Garrett, A., 1998. The origins of consonant-vowel metathesis. Language, pp.508- 556.
  5. Brown, R.A., 1985. Evidence for pre-Greek speech on Crete from Greek alphabetic sources. AM Hakkert.
  6. Campbell, L., 2015. Do Languages and Genes Correlate?, Language Dynamics and Change, 5(2), pp.202-226.
  7. Campbell, D.R., 2013. On the Theogonies of Hesiod and the Hurrians: An Exploration of the Dual Natures of Teššub and Kumarbi in: R. Creation and Chaos: A reconsideration of Hermann Gunkel’s Chaos Kampf Hypothesis, Winona Lake, Indiana, pp.26-43.
  8. Chadwick, J., 1969. Greek and pre-Greek. Transactions of the Philological Society, 68(1), pp.80- 98.
  9. Çilingiroğlu, Ç. and Çakırlar, C., 2013. Towards configuring the neolithisation of Aegean Turkey. Documenta Praehistorica, 40, pp.21-29.
  10. Colledge, S., Conolly, J., Shennan, S., Bellwood, P., Bouby, L., Hansen, J., Harris, D., Kotsakis, K., Özdogan, M., Peltenburg, E. and Willcox, G., 2004. Archaeobotanical Evidence for the Spread of Farming in the Eastern Mediterranean 1. Current anthropology, 45(S4), pp.S35-S58. Davis, B., 2013. Syntax in Linear A: The Word-Order of the ‘Libation Formula’. Kadmos, 52(1), pp.35-52.
  11. Dietrich, B.C., 1967. Some light from the east on Cretan cult practice. Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte, (H. 4), pp.385-413
  12. Fernández, E., Pérez-Pérez, A., Gamba, C., Prats, E., Cuesta, P., Anfruns, J., Molist, M., Arroyo- Pardo, E. and Turbón, D., 2014. Ancient DNA analysis of 8000 BC near eastern farmers supports an early neolithic pioneer maritime colonization of Mainland Europe through Cyprus and the Aegean Islands. PLoS Genet, 10(6), p.e1004401
  13. Frahm, E.E., 2010. The Bronze-Age obsidian industry at Tell Mozan (Ancient Urkesh), Syria: redeveloping electron microprobe analysis for 21st-Century sourcing research and the implications for obsidian use and exchange in Northern Mesopotamia after the neolithic.
  14. Furnée, E.J., 1972. Die wichtigsten konsonantischen Erscheinungen des Vorgriechischen: mit einem Appendix über den Vokalismus. Mouton.
  15. Georgiev, V. I. 1966. Introduzione alla storia delle lingue indeuropee (Vol. 9). Ed. dell'Ateneo. Georgiev, V. 1966. Was stellt die Pelasgertheorie dar?, Lingua 16:263-273
  16. Goldberg, A., Günther, T., Rosenberg, N.A. and Jakobsson, M., 2017. Ancient X chromosomes reveal contrasting sex bias in Neolithic and Bronze Age Eurasian migrations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, p.201616392.
  17. Gordon, C.H., 1957. Notes on Minoan Linear A. Antiquity, 31(123), pp.124-130.
  18. Güterbock, H.G., 1948. The Hittite version of the Hurrian Kumarbi myths: oriental forerunners of Hesiod. American Journal of Archaeology, 52(1), pp.123-134.
  19. Halstead 1996. “The development of agriculture and pastoralism in Greece: When, how, who, and what?” in “The origins and spread of agriculture and pastoralism in Eurasia”. Edited by D.
  20. R. Harris, pp. 296–309. London: UCL Press.
  21. Hester, D.A., 1964. “Pelasgian”—A new Indo-European language?, Lingua, 13, pp.335-384.
  22. Hofmanová, Z., Kreutzer, S., Hellenthal, G., Sell, C., Diekmann, Y., Díez-del-Molino, D., van Dorp, L., López, S., Kousathanas, A., Link, V. and Kirsanow, K., 2016. Early farmers from across Europe directly descended from Neolithic Aegeans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, p.201523951.
  23. Hume, E., 1998. The role of perceptibility in consonant/consonant metathesis. In Proceedings of West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (Vol. 17, No. 1998, pp. 293-307).
  24. Kassian, A., 2014. Lexical matches between Sumerian and Hurro-Urartian: possible historical scenarios. Cuneiform Digital Library Journal, 4, pp.1-23.
  25. Kretschmer, P., 1896. Einleitung in die Geschichte der griechischen Sprache. Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.
  26. Kretschmer, P., 1940-1943. Die vorgriechischen Sprach-und Volksschichten. Glotta, 28(3./4. H), pp.231-278.
  27. Kroonen, G., 2012. Non-Indo-European root nouns in Germanic: evidence in support of the Agricultural Substrate Hypothesis. A linguistic map of prehistoric Northern Europe, pp.239-260.
  28. Kroonen, G.J., 2012. On the etymology of Greek ἄγλῑς and γέλγις 'garlic': an Akkadian loanword in Pre-Greek. Journal of Indo-European Studies, 40(3/4), p.289.
  29. McCall, D. and Fleming, H.C., 2012. The pre-Classical circum-Mediterranean world: who spoke which languages?, Archaeology and Language III: Artefacts, Languages and Texts, 1, p.231.
  30. Mellaart, J., 1963. Excavations at Çatal Hüyük, 1962: second preliminary report. Anatolian Studies, pp.43-103.
  31. Nikolaev, S. L., 1985, Severokavkazskie zaimstvovaniya v hettskom i drevenegrečeskom, Drevnyaya Anatoliya 60-73, Moskva.
  32. Palmer, L.R., 1958. Luvian and Linear A. Transactions of the Philological Society, 57(1), pp.75- 100.
  33. Palmer, L.R., 1963. The Interpretation of Mycenaean Greek Texts.(Illustr.). At the Clarendon Press.
  34. Paschou, P., Drineas, P., Yannaki, E., Razou, A., Kanaki, K., Tsetsos, F., Padmanabhuni, S.S., Michalodimitrakis, M., Renda, M.C., Pavlovic, S. and Anagnostopoulos, A., 2014. Maritime route of colonization of Europe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(25), pp.9211-9216.
  35. Petit, T., 1995. Amathous (autochthones eisin). De l'identité amathousienne à l'époque des royaumes (Vlll-IV" siècles), Sources. Travaux historiques, pp.43-44.
  36. Petit, T., 1997. La langue étéocypriote ou l '"amathousien": Essai d'interprétation grammaticale. Archiv für Orientforschung, pp.244-271.
  37. Pinhasi, R., Pluciennik, M., Bentley, A., Bocquet Appel, J., Bulbeck, D., Perls, C., Zilho, J., Pinhasi, R. and Pluciennik, M., 2004. A Regional Biological Approach to the Spread of Farming in Europe: Anatolia, the Levant, SouthEastern Europe, and the Mediterranean 1. Current Anthropology, 45(S4), pp.S59-S82.
  38. Pinhasi, R., Fort, J. and Ammerman, A.J., 2005. Tracing the origin and spread of agriculture in Europe. PLoS Biol, 3(12), p.e410.
  39. Renfrew, C., 1998. Word of Minos: the Minoan contribution to Mycenaean Greek and the linguistic geography of the Bronze Age Aegean. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 8(02), pp.239-264.
  40. Schrijver, P.C.H., 2011. La langue hattique et sa pertinence possible pour les contacts linguistiques préhistoriques en Europe occidentale. Contacts linguistiques dans l’Occident méditerranéen antique, pp.241-255.
  41. Schrijver, P.C.H., 2007. Keltisch en de buren: 9000 jaar taalcontact (pp. 1-32). Utrecht University.
  42. Stephens, L. and Justeson, J.S., 1978. Reconstructing "Minoan" Phonology: The Approach from Universals of Language and Universals of Writing Systems. Transactions of the American Philological Association (1974-), 108, pp.271-284.
  43. Tringham, R. 2000. Southeastern Europe in the transition to agriculture in Europe: Bridge, buffer, or mosaic in Europe’s first farmers. Edited by D. Price, pp. 19–56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  44. Van Andel, T.H. and Runnels, C.N., 1995. The earliest farmers in Europe. Antiquity, 69(264), pp.481-500.
  45. Yakubovič , I.S., 2008. Sociolinguistics of the Luvian language. ProQuest.
comments powered by Disqus
 
About PsyJournals.ru

© 2007–2019 Portal of Russian Psychological Publications. All rights reserved

PsyJournals.ru in Russian

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Catalogue of academic journals in psychology & education MSUPE

Creative Commons License

RSS Psyjournals at facebook Psyjournals at Twitter Psyjournals at Youtube Яндекс.Метрика