Russian Psychological Issues PsyJournals.ru
OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS
JournalsTopicsAuthorsEditor's Choice For AuthorsAbout PsyJournals.ruContact Us

  Previous issue (2019. Vol. 27, no. 2)

Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)

Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

ISSN (printed version): 2075-3470

ISSN (online): 2311-9446

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17759/cpp

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Started in 1992

Published quarterly

Free of fees
Open Access Journal

 

Where the empathy came from to psychotherapy: Carl Rogers' psychoanalytic predecessors and successors 1859

Karyagina T.D., Associate Professor, Chair of Individual and Group Psychotherapy, Faculty of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, Moscow state University of psychology and education, Moscow, Russia, kartan18@gmail.com
Abstract
The situation of empathy appearing and assertion in psychotherapy is analyzed from the historical point of view in the paper. The early psychoanalytic approaches of Sh. Ferentсi and O.Rank and their probable connection with C.Rogers views are presented. Some facts about H.Kohut and C.Rogers as founders of theories where the empathy is the core concept are first time mentioned in Russian psychology. Triple status of empathy in H.Kohut Self-psychology is analyzed in details: as the method of psychology, as psychoanalyst’s instrument and as the object of the universal personality need. Rogers’ and Kohut’s ideas development in modern experiental approaches and intersubjective psychoanalysis are viewed.

Keywords: empathy, relational psychotherapy, psychoanalysis, Self –psychology, intersubjective psychoanalysis, person-centered approach (PCA), experiental approach, the method of psychotherapy, the method of psychology

Column: Theory and methodology

For Reference

References
  1. Bohart A.K. Jempatija v klient-orientirovannoj psihoterapii: sopostavlenie s psihoanalizom i Ja-psihologiej // Inostrannaja psihologija. T. 1. 1993. № 2.
  2. Gippenrejter Ju.B., Karjagina T.D., Kozlova E.N. Fenomen kongrujentnoj jempatii // Voprosy psihologii. 1993. № 4.
  3. Kan M. Mezhdu terapevtom i klientom. Novye vzaimootnoshenija. SPb.: B.S.K., 1997.
  4. Karjagina T.D. Nekotorye problemy izuchenija jempatii v kontekste psihologi-cheskogo konsul'tirovanija i psihoterapii // Kul'turno-istoricheskaja psihologija. 2009. № 4.
  5. Karjagina T.D. Problema formirovanija jempatii // Konsul'tativnaja psihologija i psihoterapija. 2010. № 1.
  6. Karjagina T.D. Filosofskie i nauchnye konteksty problemy jempatii // Moskovskij psihoterapevticheskij zhurnal. 2009. № 4.
  7. K. Rodzhers i ego posledovateli: psihoterapija na poroge XXI veka / pod red. D. Brjeziera. M., 2005.
  8. Kohut H. Analiz samosti. M., 2003.
  9. Kohut H. Vosstanovlenie samosti. M., 2002.
  10. Kohut H. Introspekcija, jempatija i psihoanaliz: issledovanie vzaimootnoshenij mezhdu sposobom nabljudenija i teoriej // Antologija sovremennogo psi-hoanaliza / pod red. A.V. Rassohina. T. 1. M., 2000.
  11. Kohut H. Psihoanaliticheskoe lechenie narcissicheskih rasstrojstv lichnosti: principy sistematicheskogo podhoda // Antologija sovremennogo psihoana-liza / pod red. A.V. Rassohina. T. 1. M., 2000.
  12. Lejbin V.M. Slovar'-spravochnik po psihoanalizu. SPb., 2001.
  13. Lejbin V.M. Postklassicheskij psihoanaliz. Jenciklopedija. T. 1, 2. M., 2006.
  14. Rank O. Mif o rozhdenii geroja. M.–Kiev, 1997.
  15. Rodzhers K. Vzgljad na terapiju. Stanovlenie cheloveka. M., 1994.
  16. Rodzhers K. Klientocentrirovannyj/chelovekocentrirovannyj podhod v psihoterapii // Voprosy psihologii. 2001. № 2.
  17. Rodzhers K. Rodzhers, Kohut, Jerikson: lichnyj vzgljad na nekotorye shodstva i razlichija. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://mary1982.narod.ru/rogers2.html
  18. Rodzhers K. Jempatija // Psihologija motivacii i jemocij / pod red. Ju.B. Gippenrejter i M.V. Falikman. M., 2002.
  19. Rodzhers K., Midor B. Lichnostno-centrirovannaja terapija // Zhurnal prakticheskoj psihologii i psihoanaliza. 2002. № 4. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://www.psyjournal.ru
  20. Stepanov S.S. Vek psihologii: imena i sud'by. M., 2002.
  21. Stolorou R., Brandshaft B., Atvud D. Klinicheskij psihoanaliz: intersub’ektivnyj podhod. M., 2011.
  22. Ferenci Sh. Telo i podsoznanie. Snjatie zapretov s seksual'nosti. M., 2003.
  23. Ferenci Sh. Teorija i praktika psihoanaliza. M.: Universitetskaja kniga, Per Se, 2000.
  24. Jera kontrperenosa: Antologija psihoanaliticheskih issledovanij (1949–1999) / sost. I.Ju. Romanov. M., 2005.
  25. Jetchegoen G. Kontrperenos // Jera kontrperenosa: Antologija psihoanaliticheskih issledovanij (1949–1999) / sost. I.Ju. Romanov. M., 2005.
  26. Jagnjuk K.V. Priroda jempatii i ee rol' v psihoterapii // Zhurnal prakticheskoj psihologii i psihoanaliza. 2003. № 1. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://www.psyjournal.ru
  27. Empathy Reconsidered. 1997. New Directions in Psychotherapy / Edited by A.C. Bozarth and L.S. Greenberg. АPA.
  28. Ferenci Sh. 1990. The Elastisity of Psycho-Analytic Technique. The Evolution of Psychoanalytic Technique. Edited by M. Bergmann, F. Hartman. Columbia University Press.
  29. Kahn E., Rachman A. 2000. Carl Rogers and Heinz Kohut: A historical Perspective. Psychoanalytic Psychology. Vol. 17 (2).
  30. Kohut H. 1984. How does analysis cure? The University Chicago Press.
  31. Lazarus A. 2007. On necessity and sufficiency in counseling and psychotherapy (revisited). Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training. Vol. 44 (3).
  32. Orange D. 2002. There is No Outside: Empathy and Authenticity in Psychoanalytic process. Psychoanalytic Psychology. Vol. 19 (4).
  33. Rachman A. 2007. Sandor Ferenci’s contributions to the evolution of psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Psychology. Vol. 24 (1).
  34. Rogers C. 2007. The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training. Vol. 44 (3).
  35. Vanaershot G. 2004. It takes two for tango: On empathy with fragile Processes. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training. Vol. 41 (2).
  36. Warner M. 1997. Does Empathy cure? Empathy Reconsidered. New Directions in Psychotherapy. Edited by A.C. Bozarth and L.S. Greenberg. APA.
  37. Wispe L. 1991. The psychology of Sympathy. Plenum Press, New York & London.
comments powered by Disqus
 
About PsyJournals.ru

© 2007–2019 Portal of Russian Psychological Publications. All rights reserved

PsyJournals.ru in Russian

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Catalogue of academic journals in psychology & education MSUPE

Creative Commons License

RSS Psyjournals at facebook Psyjournals at Twitter Psyjournals at Youtube Яндекс.Метрика