The «I—Other» Relations in One Special Situation of Communication

Krichevets A.N.; Solodushkina M.V.

doi:10.17759/cpp.2015230513

Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy - №3 / 2019 | Перейти к описанию

Previous issue (2019. Vol. 27, no. 2)

Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)

Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

ISSN (printed version): 2075-3470

ISSN (online): 2311-9446

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17759/cpp

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Started in 1992

Published quarterly

Free of fees
Open Access Journal

RU In Russian

Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy
2015. Vol. 23, no. 5, 290–306
doi:10.17759/cpp.2015230513
ISSN: 2075-3470 / 2311-9446 (online)

The «I—Other» Relations in One Special Situation of Communication ⁶⁴⁴

Krichevets A.N., PhD in Philosophy, Professor, leading researcher of the laboratory of neuropsychology, faculty of psychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia, ankrich@mail.ru
Solodushkina M.V., Teacher of the Department of General and Applied Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Orthodox Institute Of St. John The Theologian Of The Russian Orthodox University, s-tg@mail.ru

Full Text in Russian (PDF, 149 kb)
Quick translation of full-text in Google Translate

RUIn Russian

The individual ways of the stutter correction group participants are considered in the article. We see this situation as difficult and even antinomical for participant because it requires the his partial rejection of self-control and a trust in handing over his consciousness to the group leader. We assume that this aspect of communication is expressed only stronger in the situation considered here, but is presented in all kinds of communication. On the other hand, not only psychology, but also our culture lacks in adequate measures for understanding and control of such a processes in the communication. Our analysis of participant’s interviews shows that the participant’s way in the correctional process depends on ones attitudes towards the problem of handing control over one’s condition to the group leader.

Keywords: communication, phenomenology, activity and passivity, intersubjectivity

Column: Empathy: phenomenon and method

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2015230513

For Reference

Krichevets A.N., Solodushkina M.V. The «I—Other» Relations in One Special Situation of Communication. Konsul'tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy], 2015. Vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 290–306. doi:10.17759/cpp.2015230513. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

Busygina N.P. Fenomenologicheskii i germenevticheskii podkhody v kachestvennykh psikhologicheskikh issledovaniyakh. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya. 2009. № 1. P. 57—65.
Kovalev G.A., Radzikhovskii L.A. Obshchenie i problema interiorizatsii. Voprosy psik- hologii. 1985. № 1. P. 110—120.
Krichevets A.N. Passivnost’ v deyatel’nosti. Za predely oksyumorona. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya. 2013. T. 6. № 31. URL: http://psystudy.ru/index.php/num/ 2013v6n31/880-krichevets31.html (data obrashcheniya: 20.10.2015).
Krichevets A.N. Cogito, Drugoi i predstavleniya o psikhicheskom. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya. 2010. № 5(13). URL: http://psystudy.ru/index.php/num/2010n5- 13/377-krichevets13.html (data obrashcheniya: 20.10.2015).
Kosilova E.K., Krichevets A.N. Sub”ekt i Drugie. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta (Seriya 7. Filosofiya). 2011. № 6. P. 78—102.
Levinas E. Izbrannoe: Total’nost’ i beskonechnoe. Moscow: Publ. St. Petersburg: Publ. Kul’turnaya initsiativa: Universitetskaya kniga, 2000. 416 p.
Mal’dine A. O sverkhstrastnosti. (Post)fenomenologiya. Novaya fenomenologiya vo Frantsii i za ee predelami. Moscow: Publ. Akademicheskii proekt, 2014. P. 151—203.
Nekrasova Yu.B. Seans psikhoterapevticheskogo vozdeistviya i nekotorye psikhicheskie sostoyaniya zaikayushchikhsya. Voprosy psikhologii. 1980. № 3. P. 32—40.
Novoselova A.S., Kosolapova L.A. Vzaimodeistvie ubezhdeniya i vnusheniya v protsesse sotsializatsii i resotsializatsii podrostkov i molodezhi. Vestnik PGGPU (Seriya № 1. Psikhologicheskie i pedagogicheskie nauki). 2013. № 2. P. 5—18.
Petrovskii V.A. Myslyu? — Da! No sushchestvuyu li? Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psik- hologiya. 2011. № 3. P. 12—26.
Sartr Zh.-P. Bytie i nichto. Moscow: Publ. Respublika, 2000. 636 p.
Skripkina T.P. Psikhologiya doveriya. Moscow: Publ. Academia, 2000. 264 p.
Sokuler Z.A. German Kogen i filosofiya dialoga. Moscow: Publ. Progress-Traditsiya, 2008. 312 p.
Tengeli L. Interv’yu s professorom Laslo Tengeli: Universitet Vuppertalya: 2 iyunya 2012. Chast’ 1 (per. s nem. A. Kozyrevoi, G. Chernavina). Horizon: Fenomeno- logicheskie issledovaniya. 2012. T. 1. № 2. P. 232—247. (in Russ).
Shvarts I.E. Vnushenie v pedagogicheskom protsesse. In: Uchitel’: Kniga o professore Izraile Efremoviche Shvartse (sost. N.G. Lipkina, L.A. Kosolapova, A.I. Sannikova, B.M. Charnyi). Perm’: Knizhnyi mir, 2009. P. 79—387.
Karpova N.L. Lev Vygotsky’s ideas in family group logopsychotherapy. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art. 2014. Vol. 7. № 3. P. 90—99.
Zahavi D. Empathy, Embodiment and Interpersonal Understanding: From Lipps to Schutz. An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy. 2010. Inquire, Vol. 53. № 3. P. 285—306. doi:10.1080/00201741003784663
Zahavi D. Intentionality and Phenomenality: Phenomenological Take on the Hard Problem. The Problem of Consciousness: New Essays in Phenomenological Philos- ophy of Mind. Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 2003. Vol. 29. Special issue (Supple- ment 1). P. 63—92. doi:10.1080/00455091.2003.10717595

comments powered by Disqus

PlumX