Previous issue (2019. Vol. 9, no. 2)
Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)
The potential of socio-psychological models for the development of prevention programs (Part 1) 875
, PhD, Professor, Department of Clinical and Legal Psychology, Faculty of Legal Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia, firstname.lastname@example.org
This paper considers the problem of designing prevention programs in health and disease. We note that smoking cessation on the planet would reduce mortality from various types of cancer by 25%, and would also save the lives of hundreds of thousands of people who die each year from heart attacks. Losing weight by only 10% through proper nutrition and exercise would reduce the incidence of cardiovascular disease, as well as certain types of cancer.
Based on the literature review, we reveal the different types of prevention, show the importance of preventive measures aimed at the patient's immediate environment. Among the main difficulties associated with the development of effective prevention programs we discuss the following: 1) ignoring the psychological mechanisms of behavior change; 2) irrelevance of media broadcast methods in prevention campaigns; 3) the time between the problem behavior and its negative effects on health. We discuss the potential of social influence models for the development of prevention programs in the field of health and disease.
Bovina I.B. Social'nye predstavlenija o zdorov'e i
bolezni: struktura, dinamika, mehanizmy. - Dis. … d-ra psihol. nauk. M., 2009.
- 473 p.
Bovina I.B. Social'naja psihologija zdorov'ja i
bolezni. - M.: Aspekt press, 2008. - 263 p.
Bogomolova N.N. Social'naja psihologija massovoj
kommunikacii. - M., Aspekt press, 2008. - 191 p.
Zimbardo F., Ljajppe M. Social'noe vlijanie.
- SPb.: Piter, 2001. - 448 p.
Chaiken S., Stangor C. Attitudes and attitude
change//Annual Review of Psychology. 1987. Vol.38. P.575-630.
Falomir-Pichastor J. M., Butera F., Mugny
G. Persuasive constraint and expert vs. non-expert influence in intention
to quit smoking// European Journal of Social Psychology. 2002. Vol.32.
Jesuino J.C. Lost in translation: from
influence to persuasion // Diogenes. 2008. Vol.55. P.107-119.
Lamboy B., Saïas T. Réduire la stigmatisation des
personnes souffrant de troubles psychiques par une campagne de
communication ? Une synthèse de la littérature// Annales
Medico-psychologiques. 2013. Vol.171. P.77-82.
Matarazzo J.D. Behavioral health and behavioral
medicine: frontiers for a new health psychology// American Psychologist. 1980.
Petty R. E., Cacioppo J. T. The effects of
involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: central and
peripheral routes to persuasion// Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
1984. Vol.46. P.69-81.
Rivers S., Salovey P., Pizarro D., Pizarro J.,
Schneider T. Message framing and Pap test utilisation among women attending
a community health clinic // Journal of Health Psychology. 2005. Vol.10.
Rothman A.J., Salovey P. Shaping perceptions to
motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing// Psychological
Bulletin. 1997. Vol. 121. P.3-19.
Taylor S.E. Health psychology: the science and the
field// American Psychologist. 1990. Vol.45. P.40-50.
Tversky A., Kahneman D.The framing of decisions and
the psychology of choice// Science. 1981. Vol.211. P.453–458.
Zuckerman A., Chaiken S. A
heuristic-systematic processing analysis of the effectiveness of product
warning labels// Psychology and Marketing. 1998. Vol.15. P.621-642.