Russian Psychological Issues PsyJournals.ru
OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS
JournalsTopicsAuthorsEditor's Choice For AuthorsAbout PsyJournals.ruContact Us

  Previous issue (2019. Vol. 9, no. 2)

Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)

CrossRef

Psychology and Law

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

ISSN (online): 2222-5196

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17759/psylaw

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Started in 2011

Published quarterly

Free of fees
Open Access Journal

 

Ethical issues of using psychological knowledge in the proceedings of the non-procedural forms 1748

Safuanov F.S., Doctor of Psychology, head of chair of clinical and forensic psychology, department of legal psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russia, safuanovf@rambler.ru
Abstract
The article discusses the main ethical problems arising from the use of psychological knowledge in the criminal and civil proceedings in the form of non-procedural. Showing legal environment conducive to violations of ethics of psychological research reference and advisory nature: equality of the parties, the right of lawyers to draw on contractual basis to clarify issues related to the provision of legal aid. Reveals the main subjective factors of psychological research ethics violations: low level of professional competence psychologist, ignoring the principles of independence, objectivity, confidentiality. Suggests ways of overcoming the ethical issues - in the process of formation of graduate and postgraduate education of ethical competence, implementation of certain algorithms psychologist interaction with the side of a criminal or civil process - customer psychological services. It is proposed to consolidate legislation or regulations regulating certain kinds of non-procedural forms of use of psychological knowledge in the proceedings.

Keywords: ethical issues, expertise, reference and advisory activities psychologist, professional competence, independence and privacy.

Column: Methodological Problems of Legal Psychology

For Reference

References
  1. Mahov V.N. Ispol'zovanie znanij svedushhih lic pri rassledovanii prestuplenij. – M.: Izd-vo RUDN, 2000. – 296 p.
  2. Safuanov F.S. Sudebno-psihologicheskaja jekspertiza v ugolovnom processe. – M.: Gardarika, Smysl, 1998. – 192 p.
  3. Safuanov F.S. Neprocessual'nye formy ispol'zovanija psihologicheskih znanij v dejatel'nosti pravoohranitel'nyh i pravoprimenitel'nyh organov // Psihologija i jurisprudencija v dinamichno izmenjajushhimsja mire. – M.: Izd-vo RUDN, 2012. – pp. 336-346.
comments powered by Disqus
 
About PsyJournals.ru

© 2007–2019 Portal of Russian Psychological Publications. All rights reserved

PsyJournals.ru in Russian

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Catalogue of academic journals in psychology & education MSUPE

Creative Commons License

RSS Psyjournals at facebook Psyjournals at Twitter Psyjournals at Youtube Яндекс.Метрика