Russian Psychological Issues PsyJournals.ru
OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS
JournalsTopicsAuthorsEditor's Choice For AuthorsAbout PsyJournals.ruContact Us

  Previous issue (2019. Vol. 9, no. 2)

Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)

CrossRef

Psychology and Law

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

ISSN (online): 2222-5196

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17759/psylaw

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Started in 2011

Published quarterly

Free of fees
Open Access Journal

 

Towards discrepancy in the conclusions of the evaluation of emotional states (affects) in the practice of further comprehensive forensic psychological and psychiatric examination 709

Isaeva I.V., medical psychologist, the Department of psychology, Federal State Budgetary Institution "V. Serbsky Federal Medical Research Centre for Psychiatry and Narcology" of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia, isaeva_ira_88@list.ru
Makushkin E.V., deputy director of science, Serbsky National Research Centre for Social and Forensic Psychiatry of Ministry of Health, Moscow, Russia, eVm14@list.ru
Khan V.Ch., forensic psychiatric expert, Federal State Budgetary Institution "V. Serbsky Federal Medical Research Centre for Psychiatry and Narcology" of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia, val62642917@yandex.ru
Gorinov V.V., head of the department, Department of psychogenic and personality disorders, Federal State Budgetary Institution "V. Serbsky Federal Medical Research Centre for Psychiatry and Narcology" of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia, viktor-gorinov@yandex.ru
Abstract
The article represents problems of secondary comprehensive forensic psychological and psychiatric examination after initial assessment of the accused being in the state of affect during the act of offence. Features of expert work in conducting these examinations, the difficulties faced by psychiatrists and psychologists, reasons for possible disagreement with the conclusions of the previous experts, the need to take into account their conclusions in the argumentation of their decision were noted. To illustrate the problems mentioned, a case study of secondary examination, which does not confirms the conclusions of the primary examination in regard to the qualification of the accused's emotional state as cumulative affect, is provided. On the basis of the analysis some additions were suggested to the standard scheme of psychological research with an assessment of the picture of the emotional state according to the materials of the criminal case and the clinical interview, accounting additional information in materials of criminal case and specifities of accused's self-description presentation.

Keywords: affect, expert assessment, comprehensive forensic psychological and psychiatric examination, emotional state.

Column: Forensic and Clinical Psychology in Legal Context

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2017060211

For Reference

References
  1. Kudryavtsev I.A. Kompleksnaya sudebnaya psikhologo-psikhiatricheskaya ekspertiza [Comprehensive forensic psychological and psychiatric examination]. Moscow, 1999.
  2. Morozova M.V., Savina O.F., Safuanov F.S., Tkachenko A.A. K voprosu differentsiatsii i ekspertnoi otsenki emotsional'nykh sostoyanii [Towards differentiation and expert assessment of emotional states]. Rossiiskii psikhiatricheskii zhurnal [Russian Journal of psychiatry]. 2014. № 5. Рp. 38-46. 
  3. Safuanov F.S. Sudebno-psikhologicheskaya ekspertiza: Uchebnik dlya akademicheskogo bakalavriata [Forensic psychological examination: Training aids for academic baccalaureate]. Moscow, 2014.
  4. Safuanov F.S., Dozortseva E.G., Pechernikova T.P., Shishkov S.N., Sulimovskaya E.I. Sudebno-psikhologicheskie ekspertnye kriterii diagnostiki affekta u obvinyaemogo: Posobie dlya vrachei [Forensic psychological expert criteria for diagnostics affect of accused: A manual for medical]. Moscow, 2004.
  5. Safuanov F.S., Savina O.F., Morozova M.V., Isaeva I.V. Kriterii sudebno-psikhologicheskoi ekspertnoi otsenki yuridicheski relevantnykh emotsional'nykh sostoyanii u obvinyaemykh: Metodicheskie rekomendatsii [Criteria of Forensic psychological expert assessment of legally relevant of emotional states of accused: Guidelines]. Moscow, 2004.
  6. Affekt: Praktika sudebnoi psikhologo-psikhiatricheskoi ekspertizy. Khrestomatiya [Affect: Practice forensic psychological and psychiatric examination. Chrestomathy]. Safuanov F.S., Makushkin E.V. Moscow, 2013.
comments powered by Disqus
 
About PsyJournals.ru

© 2007–2019 Portal of Russian Psychological Publications. All rights reserved

PsyJournals.ru in Russian

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Catalogue of academic journals in psychology & education MSUPE

Creative Commons License

RSS Psyjournals at facebook Psyjournals at Twitter Psyjournals at Youtube Яндекс.Метрика