Russian Psychological Issues PsyJournals.ru
OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS
JournalsTopicsAuthorsEditor's Choice About PsyJournals.ruContact Us

  Previous issue (2019. Vol. 9, no. 2)

Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)

CrossRef

Psychology and Law

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

ISSN (online): 2222-5196

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17759/psylaw

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Started in 2011

Published quarterly

Free of fees
Open Access Journal

 

Projective Test «Congruity and Advantages» 92

Shamlikashvili T.A., Professor, Scientific and Academic Chair of the Federal Mediation Institute, Head of Chair of Mediation in the Social Sphere, Department of Juridical Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia, office@mediacia.com
Kharitonov V.N., Post Graduate Student, Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, virxav@yandex.ru
Haritonov S.V., MD, Professor of mediation in the social sphere, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia, sergeyhar@mail.ru
Pchelinceva D.N., junior researcher, Federal Institute of mediation, Moscow, Russia, saphirdinara@mail.ru
Grafsky V.P., lecturer of department of mediation in the social sphere, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia, v.grafskiy@fedim.ru
Abstract
The article presents the results of a pilot study developed by the authors of the projective test “Congruity and Advantages”. The research aims to study the main psychometric attributes of the test. The selection included 68 subjects of both genders at the age over 18. According to the study results, from the point of view of substantive validity, determined by the Delphic method, the “Congruity and Advantages” Test allows assessing the severity of two characteristics of the subjects: 1) subject's possible preferences of behavior aimed at acquiring advantages, 2) subject's preference of behavior aimed at matching one's choice with the interests of other people and/or circumstances. Criterion validity of the test is defined as sufficiently high. On an advantage scale R Spearman = 0,77 (at р<0,0001). On a scale of congruity of their behavior with others Spearman R =0,68 (at р<0,0001). Retest reliability after the study by the methods of rank correlation indicated R Spearman = 0,83 (at р<0,005). In addition, the monitoring results of the parties' tendency to violate agreements already reached reveal a significant correlation between the indicators of the “Congruity and Advantages” Test and the number of violations of agreements reached - Spearman R = 0,69 (at р=0,0001). Thus, the “Congruity and Advantages” Test can be practical in mediation as both to predict the tendency of the parties to harmonize their actions with others or to prefer their advantages, and to predict the probability of preserving agreements already reached.

Keywords: projective test, conguity, advantages, mediation, psychometric attributes.

Column: Forensic and Clinical Psychology in Legal Context

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2019090215

For Reference

References
  1. Baturin N.A., Vuchetich E.V., Kostromina S.N. et al. Rossijskij standart testirovaniya personala (vremennaya versiya, sozdannaya dlya shirokogo obsuzhdeniya v 2015 godu) (rus.) // Organizacionnaya psihologiya. [Russian standard for personnel testing (temporary version, created for wide discussion in 2015) (Rus.) / / Organizational psychology]. 2015. June (T. 5, V. 2). pp. 67—138.
  2. Venger A.L. Psihologicheskie risunochnye testy: Illyustrirovannoe rukovodstvo. [Psychological drawing tests: Illustrated guide.] Moscow: VLADOS-PRESS, 2003.160 p.
  3. Rajgorodskij D. YA. Prakticheskaya psihodiagnostika. Metodiki i testy. Uchebnoe posobie. [Practical psychodiagnosis. Methods and tests. Textbook.] Samara: Izdatel'skij Dom «BAHRAH-M», 2001. 672 р.
  4. SHamlikashvili C.A., Haritonov S.V., Pchelinceva D.N. Rezul'taty analiza osoznannogo izmeneniya urovnya dominirovaniya pri modelirovanii sporov. //Nauka i biznes: puti razvitiya. [The results of the analysis of conscious changes in the level of dominance in the modeling of disputes. // Science and business: ways of development.] 2015. № 6. pp. 19-27.
  5. SHamlikashvili C.A., Haritonov S.V., Pchelinceva D.N., Stepanishchev A.N. Rezul'taty analiza psihologicheskih faktorov, vliyayushchih na dinamiku sporov i ehkspertnaya ocenka ih podatlivosti storonnemu vliyaniyu. //Global'nyj nauchnyj potencial. [The results of the analysis of psychological factors affecting the dynamics of disputes and expert assessment of their compliance to outside influence. Global scientific potential.] 2015. № 4 (49). pp. 25-32.
  6. Shamlikashvili C.A., Haritonov S.V. Rol' ustanovok vospriyatiya v dostizhenii soglashenij vnutri semejnyh par.//Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya. [The role of plants in the perception of agreement within couples. // Theory and practice of social development.] 2013. № 9. pp. 112-117.
comments powered by Disqus
 
About PsyJournals.ru

© 1997–2019 Portal of Russian Psychological Publications. All rights reserved

PsyJournals.ru in Russian

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Catalogue of academic journals in psychology & education MSUPE

Creative Commons License

RSS Psyjournals at facebook Psyjournals at Twitter Psyjournals at Youtube Яндекс.Метрика