Previous issue (2019. Vol. 24, no. 3)
Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)
Higher Education Outcomes at the National Level on the Example of the Project “Collegiate Learning Assessment” 1116
, Deputy Director of the Information and Coordination Centre for Cooperation with the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Institute of Statistical Studies and Economics of Knowledge, National Research University “Higher School of Economics”, Moscow, Russia, email@example.comKhmeleva N.L.
, Senior Lecturer, Institute of Public Administration, Moscow, Russia, firstname.lastname@example.org
We discuss the interpretation of the concept of “learning outcomes”. Theoretical analysis widely represents the interpretations of the learning outcomes of a high school student: academic skills: understanding, application of knowledge to solve problems, synthesis, analysis and evaluation; basic skills and basic knowledge, and skills of a higher order and advanced knowledge; skills of a higher order represented as a system of critical thinking, analytic reasoning, problem solving and written communication; wide abilities interpreted as verbal, quantitative and spatial thinking, understanding, problem solving and decision making. We conclude that each considered approach distinguishes meta-subjective skills,
i.e. skills to interact with the quality of information regardless of the context. The ability to measure the meta-skills is discussed on an example of the “Collegiate learning assessment”, realized in the United States.
- Allan J. Learning outcomes in higher education. Studies in Higher
Education. 1996. Vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 93–108.
- Bloom B. S. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of
Educational Goals. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. NY: McKay, 1956, pp.
- CLA+ Overview [Elektronnyi resurs]. Council for Aid to Education. Available
at: http://cae.org/ participating-institutions/cla-overview/ (Accessed
- Cole A. What We Learned about Our Assessment Program that has Nothing to
do with Student Learning Outcomes. Journal of Political Science
Education, 2009, no. 5, pp. 294–314.
- Council for Aid to Education [Elektronnyi resurs]. Council for Aid to
Education. Available at: http:// www.cae.org/ (Accessed 22.01.2015).
- Dewey J. D., Montrosse B. E., Schröter D. C., Sullins C. D., Mattox
II J. R. Evaluator Competencies : What’s Taught Versus What’s Sought.
American Journal of Evaluation, 2008. Vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 268–287.
- Klein S. P., Kuh G. D., Chun M., Hamilton L., Shavelson R. J. An approach
to measuring cognitive outcomes across higher education institutions.
Research in Higher Education, 2005. Vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 251–276.
- Kuh G. D. The state of learning outcomes assessment in the United States.
Higher Education Management and Policy, 2010. Vol. 22, no. 1, pp.
- McPherson P., Shulenburger D. Improving student learning in higher
education through better accountability and assessment: A discussion paper for
the National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant
Colleges[Elektronnyi resurs]. National Institute for Learning Outcomes
Assessment. Available at:
- Melton R. Learning outcomes for higher education: Some key issues.
British Journal of Educational Studies, 1996. Vol. 44, no. 4, pp.
- Naughton B. A., Suen A. Y., Shavelson R. J. Accountability for what?
Understanding the learning objectives in state higher education
accountability programs. Chicago: American Educational Research Association,
2003. 238 p.
- Nusche D. Assessment of Learning Outcomes in Higher Education: a
comparative review of selected practices. OECD Education Working Papers.
OECD Publishing, 2008, no. 15. 49 p.
- Otter S. Learning Outcomes in Higher Education. A Development Project
Report, Unit for the Development of Adult Continuing Education. London: UDACE,
1992. 54 p.
- Shavelson R. J. Responding responsibly to the frenzy to assess learning in
higher education. Change, 2003, no. January/February, pp.
- Spady W. G. Organizing for Results: The Basis of Authentic Restructuring
and Reform. Educational Leadership, 1988. Vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 4–8.