Evaluation of the Semantic Dynamics of Educational Space of University in the Process of Nurturing Critical Thinking in Students of Liberal Arts and Sciences Programme

The study is devoted to the analysis of the connotative dynamics of the concepts describing the educational space of university in students of Liberal Arts and Sciences degree programme who took a course in “Thinking and Writing”. The hypothesis tested was that there would be a dynamic trend towards greater differentiation and individualization of concepts "student", "learning" and "training group" in the experimental group as compared to the control sample. The participants (152 students, including 126 females and 26 males aged from 17 to 23, M = 17.91, SD = 0.79) evaluated these concepts using the Semantic Differential Scale before and after the course. It was found (p <0.10 ÷ 0.05) that in the experimental sample the connotations for "student" showed an increase in imagery and subjective evaluation component, and the concept "learning" was assessed as less hostile and more diverse. In turn, the connotative dynamics of the meanings for "training group" was similar to that of the control group. The obtained results are of primary interest in the context of shaping the students’ learning motivation and can be employed in comparative studies of the effects produced by conceptually different educational programs.

1. Balitskaya I.V.Mul’tikul’turnyi aspekt soderzhaniya uchitel’skikh programm (na primere kolledzhei svobodnykh iskusstv SShA) [Multicultural aspect of the contents of teachers’ programs (exemplified by the USA colleges for Liberal Arts].Srednee professional’noe obrazovanie [Secondary vocational education], 2006, no.11, pp.63—66.
2. Becker J.Obrazovanie po sisteme svobodnykh iskusstv i nauk: otvet na vyzovy XXI v.[Education in the system of Liberal Arts and Sciences: the answer to the challenges of the 21st century].Voprosy obrazovaniya [Educational Studies], 2015, no.4.pp.33—61.doi: 10.17323/1814-9545-2015-4-33-61.
3. Zakharova I.V., Stryukova G.A.Semanticheskii differentsial kak metod diagnostiki vospriyatiya uchashchimisya pedagoga [Semantic differential as a method of diagnosing students’ perception of the teacher].Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie [Psychological Science and Education], 1999, no.3—4, pp.30—35.
4. Ivanova Yu.V., Sokolov P.V.Perspektivy razvitiya obrazovaniya po modeli svobodnykh iskusstv i nauk v Rossii [Prospects for the development of education in the model of liberal arts and sciences in Russia].Voprosy obrazovaniya [ Educational Studies], 2015, no. 4, pp.72—91.doi: 10.17323/1814-9545-2015-4- 72-91.
5. Kudrin A.L.Svobodnye iskusstva i nauki v sisteme rossiiskogo universitetskogo obrazovaniya [Liberal Arts and Sciences in the system of Russian university education].Voprosy obrazovaniya [ Educational Studies], 2015, no.4.pp.62—71.doi: 10.17323/1814- 9545-2015-4-62-71.
6. Leonidova O.S.Primenenie semanticheskogo differentsiala dlya realizatsii kompetentnostnogo podkhoda v VUZe [The application of the semantic differential for the implementation of the competence approach in the university].Informatizatsiya obrazovaniya i nauki [ Informatization of education and science], 2012, no.15, pp.128—134.
7. Peoples P.Razvitie rechi i kriticheskogo myshleniya u studentov v programmakh Bard-kolledzha [Development of students’ speech and critical thinking in Bard College programs].Voprosy obrazovaniya [Educational Studies], 2015, no.4, pp.116—131.doi: 10.17323/1814-9545-2015-4-116-131.
8. Serov A.A., Zabolotskaya T.A.Primenenie metodov semanticheskogo differentsiala v issledovaniyakh dinamiki samootsenki professional’noi zrelosti studentov ekonomicheskogo profilya [Application of semantic differential methods in studies of the dynamics of professional maturity of students in the economic profile].Matematika, statistika i informatsionnye tekhnologii v ekonomike, upravlenii i obrazovanii (g.Tver’, 31 maya 2016 g).Sbornik trudov P’atoi Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii [Mathematics, Statistics and Information Technology in Economics, Management and Education.Proceedings of the Fifth International Scientific and Practical Conference].Tver’: Tverskoi gosudarstvennyi universitet Publ, 2016, pp. 139—144.
9. Goodman, C.H.A comparison of the interests and personality traits of engineers and liberal arts students.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1942.Vol.26(6), pp. 721—737.doi: 10.1037/h0055696.
10. Osgood, C.E., Suci, G.J.Factor analysis of meaning.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1955.Vol.50(5), pp.325—338.doi: 10.1037/h0043965.