Features of Development of Socio-Communicative Competence in Primary Schoolchildren with Developmental Delays

The paper presents outcomes of a study on the features of social and communicative competence in joint activities in children aged 7—8 years with developmental delays.In our study, the children displayed reduced ability to negotiate, to distribute actions, to adhere to the plan, to resolve conflicts.We outline the principles of designing the educational environment for children with developmental delays within comprehensive schools in accordance with the specifics of the children’s socio-communicative competence and with a focus on the tasks set by the Federal State Education Standard of Primary Education for Students with Disabilities.Specially organised conditions as a system of specific measures ensuring the dynamics, integrity, technological effectiveness and productivity of socio-communicative competence development in children with developmental delays include the following: promoting development through a specially designed learning environment; arranging activities based on collaboration in pairs and small groups; monitoring, supporting and assessing communicative knowledge, skills and personal traits in children.

1. Vygotskii L.S Sobranie sochinenii: v 6 t.T.4.Moscow: Pedagogika, 1983.432 p.
2. Zarechnaya A.A.Psikhologicheskie usloviya razvitiya kommunikativnoi kompetentnosti u detei 6—8 let s raznym tempom psikhicheskogo razvitiya [Psychological conditions for the development of communicative competence in children 6—8 years with different rates of mental development.Ph.D.(Psychology) Thesis].Moscow, 2018.25 p.
3. Konokotin A.V.Obzor psikhologicheskikh issledovanii po probleme organizatsii sotsial’nykh vzaimodeistvii uchashchikhsya v inklyuzivnykh klassakh [Elektronnyi resurs] [Review of psychological research on social interactions of students in inclusive classrooms].Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya [Modern foreign psychology], 2018.Vol. 7, no.1, pp.45—52.doi:10.17759/ jmfp.2018070105 (Accessed 11.04.2019).
4. Obukhova L.F.Sotsiokognitivnyi podkhod k issledovaniyu intellektual’nogo razvitiya rebenka [Elektronnyi resurs] [Sociocognitive approach to the study of intellectual development of the child].Psikhologo-pedagogicheskie issledovaniya [ Psychological and pedagogical research], 2010, no. 5.http://psyedu.ru/ journal/2010/5/Obuhova.phtml (Accessed 11.04.2019).
5. Prikaz Minobrnauki Rossii ot 19.12.2014 N 1598 Ob utverzhdenii federal’nogo gosudarstvennogo obrazovatel’nogo standarta nachal’nogo obshchego obrazovaniya obuchayushchikhsya s ogranichennymi vozmozhnostyami zdorov’ya [Elektronnyi resurs] [Order of the Ministry of education of the Russian Federation of 19.12.2014 N 1598 “About the approval of the Federal state educational standard of primary General education of the students with limited opportunities of health] (Zaregistrirovano v Minyuste Rossii 03.02.2015 N 35847).URL: http://pbprog.ru/documents/documents_ element.php?ELEMENT_ID=3247 (Accessed 11.04.2019).
6. Davydov V.V.Psikhicheskoe razvitie mladshikh shkol’nikov [The mental development of Junior schoolchildren].Moscow: Pedagogika, 2002.210 p.
7. Rubtsov V.V.Akmeologicheskie modeli razvitiya detei v obuchenii [Acmeologic model of development of the learning].Akmeologiya [Acmeology], 2005, no.1, pp.17—20.
8. Rubtsov V.V.Sotsial’no-geneticheskaya psikhologiya razvivayushchego obrazovaniya [Socio-genetic psychology of developmental education].Moscow: MGPPU, 2008.416 p.
9. Rubtsov V.V, Margolis V.A., Guruzhapov.O deyatel’nostnom soderzhanii psikhologo-pedagogicheskoi podgotovki sovremennogo uchitelya dlya novoi shkoly [On the activity content of psychological and pedagogical training of a modern teacher for a new school].Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya [ Cultural and historical psychology], 2010, no.4, pp.62—68.
10. Belland B.R., Glazewski K.D., Ertmer P.A.Inclusion and Problem-Based Learning: Roles of Students in a Mixed-Ability Group [Elektronnyi resurs].RMLE Online, 2009.Vol.32, no.9, pp.1—19.URL: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ EJ858823.pdf (Accessed 11.04.2019).
11. Fitch E.F., Hulgin K.M.Achieving inclusion through CLAD: Collaborative Learning Assessment through Dialogue.International Journal of Inclusive Educational, 2013.Vol.12, no.4, pp.423—439.doi:10.1080/13603110601121453
12. CGT Éduc’action — Cahier syndical [Elektronnyi resurs].AESH, 12, 2015.URL: https://www.cgtr-educaction.com/attachment/626407/ (Accessed 11.04.2019).
13. Klavina A., Martin E.Block The Effect of Peer Tutoring on Interaction Behaviors in Inclusive Physical Education.Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 2008.Vol.25, no.2, pp.132—158.doi=10.1.1.917.6099&re p=rep1&type=pdf
14. Mavrou K.Examining peer acceptance in verbal and non-verbal interaction during computer-supported collaborative learning: implications for inclusion.International Journal of Inclusive Educational, 2012.Vol.16.no.2, pp.119—138.doi:10.1080/13603111003671657