Russian Psychological Issues PsyJournals.ru
OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS
JournalsTopicsAuthorsEditor's Choice About PsyJournals.ruContact Us

  Previous issue (2018. Vol. 10, no. 4)

Psychological-Educational Studies

Former Title: Psychological Science and Education psyedu.ru

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

ISSN (online): 2587-6139

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17759/psyedu

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Started in 2009

Published quarterly

Free of fees
Open Access Journal

 

Creativity and Inclusive Culture of the Educational Organization

Shemanov A.Yu., Ph.D. in Philosophy, Head, the Laboratory of Problems of Social and Cultural Rehabilitation, Moscow, Russia, ajshem@mail.ru
Makaeva D.E., Master Student, Chair of Special (Defectological) Education, Department of Clinical and Special Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russia, artemis4@yandex.ru
Abstract
Article examines the importance of interest in the results of creative activity of people with a disability as a factor in the formation of focus on creative interaction and socio-cultural community with them. We hypothesis that the focus on the active participation of special needs people in the creative activity is more pronounced in a case of interest in the results of their creativity. The study was conducted online, study sample was 40 Russian-speaking respondents, users of social networks dedicated to the creativity of special needs people: 75% women and 25% of men aged 20 to 55. Almost all respondents declared a positive attitude to the creativity of people with disabilities, but only about half of them (47.5%) expressed a clear interest in their creative activities. When comparing the group of respondents who have expressed interest, it was found that this group has significantly more pronounced focus on interacting with people with disabilities than in the group who did not report such interest, and those who value creative activities only as useful and meaningful for special needs people (p < 0.02). The results are meaningful for the creating an inclusive culture in educational institutions.

Keywords: inclusion, creativity, interest in the creativity, special needs people, normative anthropology, online-poll

Column: Pedagogical Psychology

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17759/psyedu.2016080103

For Reference

References

  1. Alekhina S.V. Printsipy inklyuzii v kontekste izmenenii obrazovatel'noi praktiki [The principles of inclusion in the context of modern education]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie [Psychological Science and Education], 2014, no. 1, pp. 5–16. (In Russ., Abstr. in Engl.).
  2. Booth T., Ainscow M. Pokazateli inklyuzii. Prakticheskoe posobie [Indicators of inclusion. Practical Guide]. Perfil'eva M. (eds). Moscow: Publ. ROOI «Perspektiva», 2007. 124 p. (In Russ.).
  3. Popova N.T. Kul'turologicheskii podkhod k inklyuzii v praktike obrazovaniya [The culturological approach to the inclusion in the educational practice]. In Alekhina S.V. (ed.) Psikhologo-pedagogicheskie osnovy inklyuzivnogo obrazovaniya [The psychological and educational basics of the inclusive education]. Moscow: Publ. MSUPE, Publ. OOO «Buki Vedi», 2013, pp. 38–51.
  4. Ryzhov V.V. O reformatsii soznaniya: nravstvenno-ekologicheskoe myshlenie – novaya paradigma soznaniya [On mind reformation: ethical and ecological mindset – new paradigm of mind] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Filosofsko-religioznye tetradi [Philosophical and religious workbooks]. 2012, no. 6. Puti Reformatsii [The ways of reformation]. Available at: http://www.intelros.ru/readroom/filosofsko-religioznye-tetradi/tetrad6/19291-o-reformacii-soznaniya-nravstvenno-ekologicheskoe-myshlenie-novaya-paradigma-soznaniya.html (Accessed 8.05.2015). (In Russ.).
  5. Shemanov A.Yu. Antropologiya inklyuzii: avtonomiya ili autentichnost'? [Anthropology of Inclusion: Autonomy or Authenticity?]. Observatoriya kul'tury [Observatory of culture], 2014, no. 4, pp. 9–16.
  6. Glaveanu Vlad P. Paradigms in the Study of Creativity: Introducing the Perspective of Cultural Psychology. New Ideas in Psychology, 2010. Vol. 28, pp. 79–93, doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2009.07.007.
  7. Janson Ulf. Interaction and Quality in Inclusive Preschool Social Play between Blind and Sighted Children. Interaction and Quality. Report of the CIDREE Collaborative Project on Early Childhood Education, Dundee: Scottish Consultative Council on the Curriculum, CCC. 1997, pp. 30–42.
  8. Meininger Herman P. Authenticity in Community. Journal of Religion, Disability and Health, 2001. Vol.5, no. 2, pp. 13–28, doi: 10.1300/J095v05n02_02.
  9. Paliocosta Paty, Blandford Sonia. Inclusion in School: a Policy, Ideology or Lived Experience? Similar Findings in Diverse School Cultures. Support for Learning, 2010. Vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 179–186. doi 10.1111/j.1467-9604.2010.01464.x
  10. Slee Robert. Beyond Special and Regular Schooling? An Inclusive Education Reform Agenda. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 2008. Vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 99–116. doi: 10.1080/09620210802351342
comments powered by Disqus
 
About PsyJournals.ruLaureate of the XIV National psychological contest «Golden Psyche» at the results of 2012

© 1997–2019 Portal of Russian Psychological Publications. All rights reserved

PsyJournals.ru in Russian

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Catalogue of academic journals in psychology & education MSUPE

RSS Psyjournals at facebook Psyjournals at Twitter Psyjournals at Youtube Яндекс.Метрика