Russian Psychological Issues PsyJournals.ru
OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS
JournalsTopicsAuthorsEditor's Choice About PsyJournals.ruContact Us

  Previous issue (2019. Vol. 10, no. 2)

Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)

Social Psychology and Society

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

ISSN (printed version): 2221-1527

ISSN (online): 2311-7052

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17759/sps

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Started in 2010

Published quarterly

Free of fees
Open Access Journal

 

M.Yu. Kondratyev’s Social Psychological Phenomenon of “Closedness”: From a “Closed Group” to a “Closed Society” 1274

Radina N.K., Doctor of Political Science, PhD in Psychology, professor at the Department of Social Sciences, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Nizhniy Novgorod, Russia, rasv@yandex.ru
Abstract
The paper traces the logic of research into the phenomenon of “closedness” from a small group to a “closed society”. The works of Mikhail Kondratyev dedicated to closed groups are reviewed in the context of research on orphanages and as crucial in defining the psychological content of the very phenomenon of “social closedness”. As an example of how M. Kondratyev’s key ideas on closed groups may be applied, the paper presents an empirical research on the “closed society”. It is argued that all basic social psychological patterns discovered by M. Kondratyev in small closed groups are completely relevant to the ones found in the big closed group — the “closed society”.

Keywords: three-factor model of significant other, authority, attraction, reference, closed group, closed society

Column: Empirical Research

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17759/sps.2016070104

For Reference

References
  1. Efimchuk I.V. Sostvennost’ kak social’naiya sistema [The property as a social system]. Nizhny Novgorod. Publ. University of Nizhny Novgorod. 2004. 320 р.
  2. Julien F. Traktat ob effektivnosty [Treatise on the effectiveness]. Moscow, St. Peters- burg: Moscow philosophical foundation, University Book, 1999. 236 р.
  3. Zdravomyslova E., Temkina A. Krizis maskulinnosty v pozdnesovetskom diskurse [Masculinity crisis in the late Soviet discourse]. In Ushakin S. (ed). O maskulinnosty [About manhood]. Moscow: New Literary Review, 2002. pp. 432—451.
  4. Kondratiev M.Y. Osobennosty intragruppovogo strukturirovaniya v soobshestvah nesovershennoletnih pravonarushiteley v usloviyah prinuditel’noy izoliaciy [Features in- tragruppovogo structuring communities of juvenile offenders under forced isolation]. Social’naiya psihologiya i obschestvo [Social Psychology and Society]. 2011. no. 4. pp. 50—70.
  5. Kondratiev M.Y. Specifika gruppoobrazovaniua I otnosheniy mezshlichnostnoy znachi- mosty podrostkov-vospitannikov internatnih uchrezshdeniy dlia real’nih i social’nih sirot [Specificity of multiplex relations and interpersonal importance of adolescent pupils of boarding schools for real and social orphans]. Razvitie lichnosty [Personality development]. 2011. no. 3. pp. 94—110.
  6. Kondratiev M.Y. Osobennosty mezshlichnostnih otnosheniy v professional’no special- izirovannih internatov [Features of interpersonal relations in specialized boarding profes- sionally]. Voprosy psihologiy [Questions of psychology]. 1995. no. 6. pp. 33—42.
  7. Kondratiev M.Y. Podrostok v zamknutom kruge obscheniya [A teenager in a vicious circle of communication]. Moscow: Institute of Applied Psychology; Voronezh: MODEK 1997. 336 р.
  8. Mukhina V.S. Vozrastnaiya psihologiya. Fenomenologiya razvitiya [Age-related psy- chology. Phenomenology of development]. Moscow: Publ. House “Academy”, 2006. 608 р.
  9. Oleinik A.N. Turemnaia subkul’tura v Rossiy: ot povsednevnoy zshizny do gosudarst- vennoy vlasty [Prison subculture in Russia: from everyday life to public authorities]. Moscow: INFRA-M, 2001. 418 р.
  10. Petrovsky A.V. Trehfaktornaia model’ znachimigo drugogo [Three-factor model sig- nificant other]. Voprosy psihologiy [Questions of psychology]. 1991. № 1. pp. 7—18.
  11. Popper K. Otkritoe obcshestvo i ego vragy: v 2 t. [The Open Society and Its Enemies: in 2 vol.]. Moscow: Phoenix 1992.
  12. Prihozshan A.M.  Tolstyh  N.N. Osobennosty psihicheskogo razvitiya shcol’nikov, vospityva’uschihsia vne sem’i [Features of mental development of schoolchildren being raised outside the family]. Voprosy psihologiy [Questions of psychology]. 1982. no. 2. pp. 80—86.
  13. Prihozshan A.M., Tolstyh N.N. Osobennosty razvitiya lichnosty detei, vospityvaus- chihsia v usloviah materinskoy deprivaciy [Features of development of the personality of children brought up in a maternal deprivation]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie [Psychological Science and Education]. 2009. no. 3. pp. 5—12.
  14. Prihozshan A.M., Tolstyh N.N. Mladshiy shkol’nik [Junior schoolboys]. In Dubrovi- na I.V., Ruzskaya A.G. (ed.) Psihicheskoe razvitie vospitannikov detskogo doma [Mental development of children’s home]. Moscow, 1990, pp 175—204.
  15. Radina N.K. Vlast’, attrakcia i referentnost’ v social’nyh otnosheniah makro-urovnia: “zakrytaia gruppa” i “zakrytoe obschestvo” [Power, attraction and a reference to the mac- ro-level social relations: “closed group” and “closed society”]. Social’naiya psihologiya i obschestvo [Social Psychology and Society]. 2015. no. 1. pp. 45—59.
  16. Radina N.K. Gorod v prostranstve i vremeni: problemy teppitotial’noy idrntichnosty v kontekste social’nj-ekonovichesrih izmeneniy [City in space and time: the problem of territorial identity in the context of socio-economic changes]. Nizhny Novgorod: DEKOM. 2015.
  17. In Zdravomyslova E., Temkina A. (ed.). Rossiyskiy gendernyi poriadok: socio- logicheskiy podhod [The Russian gender order: a sociological approach]. St. Petersburg: Publ. house of the European University in St. Petersburg, 2007.
  18. Schrader Y.A. Chelovecheskaia refleksia i dve sistemy eticheskogo soznania [Human reflection and two systems of ethical consciousness]. Voprosy filosofiy [Problems of Phi- losophy]. 1990. no. 7. pp. 32—41.
  19. Bergson H. The Two Sources of Morality and Religion. New York: Doubleday, 1956. 298 p.
  20. Campbell B. Helvetius and the Roots of the “Closed” Society. The American Political Science Review. 1974. Vol. 68. no. 1. pp. 153—168. doi:10.2307/1959748
  21. In Fransella F. (ed.) International handbook of personal construct psychology. Chichester, UK: Wiley, 2003. 505 p.
  22. Longrigg A.J. Soviet Science and the Closed Society. The World Today. 1972. Vol. 28. no. 5. pp. 216—228.
  23. Parel A. Values of Closed Society. International Political Science Review. 1982. Vol. 3. no. 2. pp. 230—237.
comments powered by Disqus
 
About PsyJournals.ru

© 1997–2019 Portal of Russian Psychological Publications. All rights reserved

PsyJournals.ru in Russian

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Catalogue of academic journals in psychology & education MSUPE

Creative Commons License

RSS Psyjournals at facebook Psyjournals at Twitter Psyjournals at Youtube Яндекс.Метрика