Russian Psychological Issues PsyJournals.ru
OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS
JournalsTopicsAuthorsEditor's Choice About PsyJournals.ruContact Us

  Previous issue (2017. Vol. 8, no. 1)

EBSCO Academic Search International database Ulrich’s Periodicals Directory DOAJ ERIH PLUS Higher Attestation Commission Russian Science Citation Index VINITI Database RAS

Social Psychology and Society

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

ISSN (printed version): 2221-1527

ISSN (online): 2311-7052

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17759/sps

Started in 2010

Published quarterly

Free of fees
Open Access Journal

 

The impact of perception of consistency and inconsistency in parenting style on pro-social motives of adolescents 56

Karmakar R., Ph.D. in Psychology, Assistant Professor (Grade II), Amity University, Kolkata, India, rk_r80@rediffmail.com
Abstract
Adolescence is the most dynamic and eventful period of human development. During this crucial period of life, adolescents encounter challenges in life and constantly adapting to the relationship dynamics with friends, family, school and society. There is tendency of adolescents to engage in antisocial or pro-social behaviour. Adolescents’ relationship with parents and guardian significantly influence their antisocial and prosocial behavior. Pro-social behavior is defined as a behavior that is primarily aimed at benefiting others. Some pro-social behaviour is extrinsically motivated whereas some are intrinsically motivated. The present study investigated the nature of prosocial behaviour among adolescents and impact of consistency and inconsistency of parenting style on prosocial behaviour. A group of 610 adolescents (310 boys and 300 girls) aged between 16—18 years (mean = 17.07 and standard deviation = 1.02) was selected for the present study. Pro-social Motivation Questionnaire and Parental Authority Questionnaire were used to measure pro-social motive and parenting style, respectively. The results indicate that adolescents generally show higher level of intrinsic pro-social motive. Adolescent girls prefer to display internalised and empathetic pro-social motives whereas adolescent boys tend to gain others’ approval by displaying heroic activities. Consistency in parenting style facilitates intrinsic pro-social motive only when both parents are authoritative in nature. The result interestingly reveals that inconsistent parenting style is not always bad. Authoritative and permissive dyad facilitates intrinsic pro-social motive among adolescents. Implications for parental socialisation in families and pro-social motive among adolescents are discussed.

Keywords: Adolescents, Consistent parenting style, Extrinsic Pro-social Motive, Inconsistent parenting style, Intrinsic Pro-social motive

Column: Empirical Research

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17759/sps.2017080207

For Reference

References
  1. Asbury K., Dunn J.F., Pike A., Plomin R. Nonshared environmental influences on individual differences in early behavioral development: A monozygotic twin differences study. Child Development. 2003. Vol. 74, pp. 933—943.
  2. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. NJ: Prentice Hall, 1986. 617 p.
  3. Barber B.K., Stolz H.E., Olsen J.A. Parental support, psychological control, and behavioral control: Assessing relevance across time, culture, and method. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, , 2005, Vol. 70 (4), pp. 1—147. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5834.2005.00365.x
  4. Barnes G.M., Hoffman, J.H., and Welte J.W. Effects of Parental Monitoring and Peer Deviance on Substance Use and Delinquency. Journal of Marriage and Family. 2006. Vol. 68 (4), pp. 1084—1104.
  5. BarTal D., Nadler, A., Blechman N. The relationship between Israeli children’s helping behavior and their perception on parents’ socialization practices. Journal of Social Psychology. 1980. Vol. 111, pp. 159—167.
  6. Baumrind D. Effects of authoritative parental control on child behavior. Child Development. 1966. Vol. 37 (4), pp. 887—907.
  7. Baumrind D. Effective parenting during the early adolescent transition. In P.A. Cowan, E.M. Hetherington (eds.), Advances in family Research. Hillsdale: Erlbaum Associates., 1991. Vol. 2, pp 111—163.
  8. Berkien M., Louwerse A., Verhulst F., Van der Ende J. Children’s perceptions of dissimilarity in parenting styles are associated with internalizing and externalizing behavior. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2012. Vol. 21, pp. 79—85. doi:10.1007/ s00787-011-0234-9.
  9. Boehnke K., Silbereisen R.K., Eisenberg N., Reykowski J., Palmonari A. Developmental pattern of prosocial motivation: A cross-national study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1989. Vol. 20, pp. 219—243.
  10. Bronfenbrenner U. Ecological models of human development. In Gauvain, M. & Cole, M. (Eds). International Encyclopedia of Education, Oxford: Elsevier. Reprinted in: Readings on the development of children, 2nd (1993, pp. 37—43). 1994, Vol. 3(2), pp. 37—43,
  11. Bryant B.K., Crockenberg S.B. Correlates and dimensions of pro-social behavior: A study of female siblings with their mothers. Child Development, 1980. Vol. 51, pp. 529— 544.
  12. Buri J.R. Parental authority questionnaire. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1991. Vol. 57 (1), pp. 110—119.
  13. Carlo G., Rondall B.A. The development of a measure of pro-social behaviors for late adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 2002. Vol. 31, pp. 31—44.
  14. Carlo G., Roesch S.C., Koller S.H. Similarities and differences in prosocial moral reasoning between Brazilian and Anglo-American college students Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 1999. Vol. 33, pp. 151—172.
  15. Deater-Deckard K., Dunn J., O’Connor T.G., Davies L., Golding, J. Using the stepfamily genetic design to examine gene-environment processes in child and family functioning. Marriage & Family Review, 2001. Vol. 33, pp. 131—156.
  16. Dlugokinski E.L., Firestone I.J. Other centeredness and susceptibility to charitable appeals: Effect of perceived discipline. Child Development, 1974. Vol. 10, pp. 21—28.
  17. Dwairy M.A. Parental inconsistency versus parental authoritarianism: Associations with symptoms of psychological disorders. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 2008. Vol. 37(5), pp. 616—626. doi:10.1007/s10964-007-9169-3.
  18. Eisenberg N., Carlo G., Murphy B., Van Court P. Prosocial development in late adolescence: A longitudinal study. Child Development, 1995. Vol. 66, pp. 1179—1197.
  19. Eisenberg N., Fabes R.A. Pro-social development. In W. Damon (Series Ed.), N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 3: Social, emotional, and personality development (5th ed.). New York: Wiley, 1998 pp. 701—778.
  20. Erikson E. Identity, youth and crisis. New York: W. W. Norton Company, 1968. 336 p.
  21. Fletcher A.C., Steinberg L., Sellers E.B. Adolescents’ well-being as a function of perceived interparental consistency. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1999. Vol. 61(3), pp. 599—610.
  22. Fowles D.C., Kochanska G. Temperament as a moderator of pathways to conscience in children: the contribution of electrodermal activity. Psychophysiology, 2000. Vol. 37, pp. 788—795.
  23. Hoeve M., Dubas J.S., Gerris J.R.M., Van der Laan P.H., Smeenk W. Maternal and paternal parenting styles: Unique and combined links to adolescent and early adult delinquency. Journal of Adolescence, 2011. Vol. 34, pp. 813—827.
  24. Hoffman M.L. Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. UK:Cambridge University Press. 2000. 331 p.
  25. Kochanska G. Socialization and temperament in the development of guilt and conscience. Child Development, 1991. Vol. 62, pp. 1379—1392.
  26. Kochanska G. Children’s temperament, mothers’ discipline and security of attachment: Multiple pathways to emerging internalization. Child Development, 1995. Vol. 66, pp. 597— 615.
  27. Kochanska G. Mutually responsive orientation between mothers and their young children: Implications for early socialization. Child Development, 1997. Vol. 68, pp. 94—112.
  28. Kochanska G., Aksan N. Mother-child mutually positive affect, the quality of child compliance to requests and prohibitions, and maternal control as correlates of early internalization. Child Development, 1995. Vol. 66, pp. 236—254.
  29. Kochanska G., Aksan N., Joy M.E. Children’s fearfulness as a moderator of parenting in early socialization: two longitudinal studies. Developmental Psychology, 2007. Vol. 43(1), pp. 222—237.
  30. Kochanska G., Aksan N., Knaack A., Rhines H. M. Maternal parenting and children’s conscience: Early security as moderator. Child Development, 2004. Vol. 75 (4), pp. 1229—1242.
  31. Kochanska G., Coy K.C., Murray K.T. The development of selfregulation in the first four years of life. Child Development, 2001. Vol. 72 (4), pp. 1091—1111.
  32. Kochanska G., DeVet K., Goldman M., Murray K.T., Putnam S.P. Maternal reports of conscience development and temperament in young children. Child Development, 1994. Vol. 65 (3), 852—868. doi: org/10.2307/1131423.
  33. Kochanska G., Forman D., Aksan N., Dunbar S. Pathways to conscience: Early mother-child mutually responsive orientation and children’s moral emotion, conduct and cognition. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 2005. Vol. 46(1), 19—34. doi. org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00348.x
  34. Kochanska G., Gross J.N., Mei-Hua L., Nichols K.E. Guilt in young children: Development, determinants and relations with a broader system of standards. Child Development, 2002. Vol. 73, pp. 461—482.
  35. Kochanska G., Murray K. T. Mother-child mutually responsive orientation and conscience development: From toddler to early school age. Child Development, 2000. Vol. 71(2), 417—431. doi: org/10.1111/1467-8624.00154.
  36. Lam C.M. Prosocial involvement as a positive youth development construct: A conceptual review. Journal of Alternative Medicine Research, 2012. Vol. 5(10), pp. 1—8, doi: org/10.1100/2012/769158
  37. Krevans J., Gibbs J.C. Parents’ use of inductive discipline: Relations to children‘s empathy and prosocial behavior. Child Development, 1996. Vol. 67 (6), pp. 3263—3277.
  38. Leman P.J. Authority and moral reasons: parenting style and children’s perceptions of adult rule justifications. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 2005. Vol. 29(4), pp. 265—270.
  39. Lengua L.J. Growth in temperament and parenting as predictors of adjustment during children’s transition to adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 2006. Vol. 42 (5), pp. 819—832.
  40. Lengua L.J., Kovacs E.A. Bidirectional associations between temperament and parenting and the prediction of adjustment problems in middle childhood. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 2005. Vol. 26 (1), pp. 21—38.
  41. Maccoby E.E., Martin J.A. Socialization in the context of the family: Parent-child interaction. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), E. M. Hetherington (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 4. Socialization, personality, and social development (4th ed.). New York: Wiley, 1983, pp. 1—101.
  42. Mc-Nally S., Eisenberg N., Harris J.D. Consistency and change in maternal child-rearing practices and values: A longitudinal study. Child Development, 1991. Vol. 62 (1), pp. 190—198.
  43. Mestre M.V., Samper P., Frías D. Personalidad y contexto familiar como factores predictores de la disposición prosocial y antisocial de los adolescentes. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 2004. Vol. 36 (3), pp. 445—457.
  44. Oliva A., Parra A., Arranz E. Estilos relacionales parentales y ajuste adolescente. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 2008. Vol. 31 (1), pp. 93—106.
  45. Rohan M.J., Zanna M.P. Value transmission in families. In C. Sc1igman, J.M. Olson, M.P. Zanna (Eds.). The psychology of vallles: The Ontario symposillm on personality and social psychology, 1996. 8, pp. 253—276
  46. Ryan R.M., Martin A., BrooksGunn, J. Is one parent good enough? Patterns of mother and father parenting and child cognitive outcomes at 24 and 36 months. Parenting: Science and Practice, 2006. Vol. 6 (2/3), pp. 211—228.
  47. Silberstein R.K., Boehnke K., Reykowski J. Prosocial Motives from 12 to 18: A Comparison of Adolescents from Berlin and Warsaw. In R. K. Silberstein, K. Eyferth, and G. Rudinger (Eds.). Development as Action in Context, 1986, pp. 137—164.
  48. Simons L.G., Conger R.D. Linking mother-father differences in parenting to a typology of family parenting styles and adolescent outcomes. Journal of Family Issues, 2007. Vol. 28 (2), pp. 212—241.
  49. Staub E. Positive social behavior and morality: Socialization and development. 2, New York: Academic Press, 1979.
  50. Tildesley E.A., Andrews J.A. The development of children’s intentions to use alcohol: Direct and indirect effects of parent alcohol use and parenting behaviors. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 2008. Vol. 22, pp. 326—339.
  51. Torrente G., Vazsonyi A.T. The salience of the family in antisocial and delinquent behavior among Spanish adolescents. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 2008. Vol. 169, pp. 189—197.
  52. Vander Zanden, James W. Social Psychology. NY, Mc-Graw Hill, 1987.
  53. Winsler A., Madigan A.L., Aquilino S.A. Correspondence between maternal and paternal parenting styles in early childhood. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 2005. Vol. 20, pp. 1—12.
comments powered by Disqus
 
About PsyJournals.ruLaureate of the XIV National psychological contest «Golden Psyche» at the results of 2012

© 1997–2017 Portal of Russian Psychological Publications. All rights reserved

PsyJournals.ru in Russian

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Catalogue of academic journals in psychology & education MSUPE NEW!

RSS Psyjournals at facebook Psyjournals at Twitter Webometrics Яндекс.Метрика