Russian Psychological Issues PsyJournals.ru
OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS
JournalsTopicsAuthorsEditor's Choice About PsyJournals.ruContact Us

  Previous issue (2019. Vol. 10, no. 1)

Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)

Social Psychology and Society

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

ISSN (printed version): 2221-1527

ISSN (online): 2311-7052

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17759/sps

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Started in 2010

Published quarterly

Free of fees
Open Access Journal

 

Cultural value orientation and gender equity: a review 411

Siddiqi N., Research scholar, Department of Psychology, University Jamia, Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India, nasrina1991faozia@gmail.com
Shafiq M., Professor, Department of Psychology, University Jamia, Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India, prof99mshafiq@gmail.com
Abstract
In the recent past, gender issues have grabbed substantial attention from social scientists, activists and academic fraternity. Right from family to workplace to society at large, attempts have been initiated to advocate equal rights for women in different spheres of life. Despite social activists and policy makers striving hard towards gender sensitization, gender discrimination still persists in various domains of life. Therefore, there is a strong need to identify the factors that potentially determine people’s attitude towards gender equity. With this very objective, the current study examines existing literature on gender discrimination and its association with Hofstede’s (1980) cultural values. Following the “Gender-Organization-System Approach”, the present study postulates that gender equality or inequality results from a complex interaction of individual, organizational and societal factors and that it cannot be explained in isolation from the broader socio-cultural milieu. Extensive review of literature indicates that cultural values are significant predictors of people’s attitude towards gender equity and that the extent to which people conform to existing gender roles determine how much people support the idea of gender equality. The study has significant practical implications since, by means of detecting such “causal factors”, more positive attitudinal changes can be brought about and gender egalitarian attitudes can be cultivated.

Keywords: gender discrimination, gender equity, meta-analysis, cultural values, Gender-Organization-System Approach

Column: Theoretical Research

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17759/sps.2017080304

A Part of Article

When it comes to gender equality, mere policy-level amendments cannot make much difference unless a sense of gender egalitarianism is cultivated and fostered at the socio-cultural level. S. Stefanovici (n.d.) argued that “sexual inequity is rooted within the social structure itself, through the allocation by society of segregated roles for each sex. The very existence of activities and responsibilities maintain an imbalance of power between the sexes”.

For Reference

References
  1. Amin N.B., Sogra K.J. Women entrepreneurship: A cross country comparative study (Unpublished Masters Dissertation). Dhaka University Institutional Repository, Bangladesh, 2014. 223. p.
  2. Archer J. Cross-cultural differences in physical aggression partners: A social-role analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2006. Vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 133—153. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1002_3
  3. Bertsch A., Søderholm G.W. Updating cross cultural management: Exploring the relationships between cultural values and gender inequality practices. Research paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of International Business (AIB), Washington, DC, USA. 2012.
  4. Bond R., Smith P.B. Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch’s (1952, 1956) Line Judgment Task. Psychological Bulletin, 1996. Vol. 119, no. 2. 1, pp. 111— 137.
  5. Breckler S.J., Olson J.M., Wiggins E.C. Social Psychology Alive. Belmont, 2006. 316 p.
  6. Cukur C.S., De-Gusman M.R.T., Carlo G. Religiosity, values, and horizontal and vertical individual-collectivism: A study of Turkey, the United States, and the Philippines. Journal of Social Psychology, 2004. Vol. 144, pp. 613—634. doi: 10.3200/SOCP.144.6.613- 634
  7. Culture and leadership across the world: The GLOBE book of in-depth studies of 25 societies. In Chhokar J.S., Brodbeck F.C., House, R.J. (Eds.). Mahwah, N.J., 2007. 990 p.
  8. Demographic & Health Survey. Democratic Republic of the Congo. Calverton, MD, 2007. 11 p.
  9. Désert M., Leyens J.P. Social comparison across cultures: Gender stereotypes in high and low power distance cultures. In S. Guimond (Ed.). Social comparison and social psychology: Understanding cognition, intergroup relations and culture. Cambridge, 2006. 308 p.
  10. Deutsch M., Gerard H.B. A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. The journal of abnormal and social psychology, 1955. Vol. 51, no. 3, 629 p.
  11. Dohi I., Fooladi M.M. Individualism as a solution for gender equality in Japanese society. Forum on Public Policy: A Journal of the Oxford Round Table (Online), 2008. Edition, 1—12, pp. 1—12.
  12. Emrich C.G., Denmark F.L., Den-Hartog D.N. Cross-cultural differences in gender egalitarianism: Implications for societies, organizations, and leaders. In R.J. House, P.J. Hanges, M. Javidan, P.W. Dorfman, V. Gupta (Eds.). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. CA: Sage, 2004, pp. 343—394.
  13. Fincher C.L., Thornhill R., Murray D.R., Schaller M. Pathogen prevalence predicts human cross-cultural variability in individualism/collectivism. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 2008. Vol. 275, pp. 1379—1385. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0094.
  14. Gilligan C. In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, M.A., 1982. 7. p.
  15. Gilman C.P. Women and economics. L., 1898. 111. p.
  16. Glick P. Ambivalent sexism, power distance and gender inequality across genders. In S. Guimond (Ed.). Social comparison and social psychology. N.Y., 2006, pp. 283—302.
  17. Goncalo J.A., Staw B.M. Individualism-collectivism and group creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2006. Vol. 100, pp. 96—109. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.11.003
  18. Guimond S., Branscombe N.R., Brunot S., Buunk A.P., Chatard A., Désert M., Yzerbyt V. Culture, gender, and the self: Variations and impact of social comparison processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2007. Vol. 92, pp. 1118—1134. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1118
  19. Hamamura T. Power distance predicts gender differences in math performance across societies. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2012. Vol. 3, pp. 545—548.
  20. Hofstede G. Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills CA, 1980. 325 p.
  21. Hofstede G. Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. L., 2003. 597 p.
  22. Holmberg I., Akerblom S. Primus inter pares—Leadership and culture in Sweden. Stockholm School of Economics. Centre for Advanced Studies in Leadership Research Paper Series, 1, 1998. 40 p.
  23. Jeknić R. Gender equality, young women and culture in the context of the “masculinity/ femininity” as a dimension in Geert Hofstede’s model of “national culture”. Conference proceedings, Faculty of law, University of Split, Croatia, 2014, pp. 681—696.
  24. Johnson C.E. Meeting the ethical challenges of leadership: Casting light or shadow (5th Edn.). L.A., 2015. 385 p.
  25. Kashima Y., Yamaguchi S., Kim U., Choi S.C., Gelfand M.J., Yuki M. Culture, gender and self: A perspective from individualism-collectivism research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1995. Vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 925—937.
  26. Keating M.A., Martin G.S. Societal culture and leadership in the Republic of Ireland. In J. S. Chhokar, F. Brodbeck, & R. J. House (Eds.). Managerial cultures of the world: GLOBE in-depth studies of the cultures of 25 countries. Mahwah, NJ, 2007, pp. 361—396.
  27. Kim E. Korean American parental control: Acceptance or rejection? Ethos, 2005. Vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 347—366.
  28. Kim H.S., Markus H.R. Deviance or uniqueness, harmony or conformity? A cultural analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1999. Vol. 77, pp. 785—800.
  29. Kinias Z., Kim H.S. Culture and gender inequality: Psychological consequences of perceiving gender inequality. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 2011. Vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1—16. doi: 10.1177/1368430211408940
  30. Kitayama S., Cohen D. The handbook of cultural psychology. N.Y., 2007. 199 p.
  31. Lane J., Wagschal U. Culture and Politics. New York, 2012. 288 p.
  32. Long R. Gender Inequality [Electronic resource]. 2011. URL: http://dmc122011. delmar.edu/socsci/rlong/problems/chap-09.htm (Accessed 26.10.2014).
  33. Markus H., Kitayama S. Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 1991. Vol. 98, pp. 224—253.
  34. Milner L.M., Collins J.M. Sex-role portrayals and the gender of nation. Journal of Advertising, 2000. Vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 67—79.
  35. Oishi S., Schimmack U., Diener E., Suh E.M. The measurement of values and individualism—collectivism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,. 1998. Vol. 24, pp. 1177—1189.
  36. Parboteeah K.P., Hoegl M., Cullen J.B. Managers’ gender role attitudes: A country institutional profile approach. Journal of International Business Studies, 2008. Vol. 39, pp. 795—813.
  37. Peabody D. National characteristics. Cambridge, England, 1985.
  38. Plueddemann J.E. Leading across cultures effective ministry and mission in the global church. Downers Grove, I.L., 2009, pp. 90—110.
  39. Samovar L.A. Porter R.E., McDaniel E.R. Intercultural Communication: A Reader (13th Edt.). Boston, 2010. 202 p.
  40. Sanderson C.A. Social Psychology. Hoboken N.J, 2010. 405 p.
  41. Schwartz S.H., Rubel T. Sex differences in value priorities: Cross-cultural and multimethod studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2005. Vol. 89, pp. 1010—1028. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.1010
  42. Smith P.B., Bond M.H. Social psychology across cultures. Massachusetts, 1999. 401 p.
  43. Stefanovici S. Gender and individualism in American culture [Electronic resource]. URL: http://www.upm.ro/facultati_departamente/stiinte_litere/conferinte/situl_ integrare_europeana/Lucrari3/SG/59_Stefanovici_Gender.pdf (Accessed 15.03.2015).
  44. Tavanti M., Werhane P.H. On complacency, corporate cliffs and power distance: Global leadership ethics from gender and cultural studies perspectives. Leadership and the Humanities, 2013. Vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 22—30.
  45. Triandis H.C. Individualism & collectivism. Colorado, 1995.
  46. Trommsdorff G. Parent-adolescent relations in changing societies: A cross-cultural study. In P. Noack & M. Hofer (Eds.). Psychological responses to social change: Human development in changing environments. Berlin, 1995, pp. 189—218.
  47. Vandello J.A., Cohen D. Patterns of individualism and collectivism across the United States. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1999. Vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 279—292. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.77.2.279
  48. Vandello J.A., Cohen D. Male honor and female fidelity: Implicit cultural scripts that perpetuate domestic violence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2003. Vol. 84, no. 5, pp. 997—1010. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.997
  49. Warren J.W. The American narcissus: Individualism and women in nineteenth century American fiction. New Brunswick, 1984.
  50. Welter B. The cult of true womanhood: 1820—1860. American Quarterly, 1966. Vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 151—174. doi: 10.2307/2711179
  51. Wheeler K.G. Cultural values in relation to equity sensitivity within and across cultures. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 2002. Vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 612—627. doi:10.1108/02683940210444067
  52. Williams R.M. Jr. American society: A sociological interpretation (3rd Edn.). N.Y., 1970.
  53. Women’s Commission for Refugee Women and Children. Masculinities: Male Roles and Male Involvement in the Promotion of Gender Equality-A Resource Packet. N.Y., 2005. 44 p.
  54. Yang C.K. Introduction. In M. Weber’s, The religion of China. N.Y., 1963, pp. 13—43.
comments powered by Disqus
 
About PsyJournals.ruLaureate of the XIV National psychological contest «Golden Psyche» at the results of 2012

© 1997–2019 Portal of Russian Psychological Publications. All rights reserved

PsyJournals.ru in Russian

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Catalogue of academic journals in psychology & education MSUPE

RSS Psyjournals at facebook Psyjournals at Twitter Psyjournals at Youtube Яндекс.Метрика