Russian Psychological Issues PsyJournals.ru
OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS
JournalsTopicsAuthorsEditor's Choice About PsyJournals.ruContact Us

  Previous issue (2019. Vol. 10, no. 2)

Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)

Social Psychology and Society

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

ISSN (printed version): 2221-1527

ISSN (online): 2311-7052

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17759/sps

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Started in 2010

Published quarterly

Free of fees
Open Access Journal

 

Attitudes towards Biobank Donation Among University Community 137

Antonova N.A., PhD in Psychology, Senior Researcher, Herzen State Pedagogical University, St.Petersburg, Russia, antonova.natalia11@gmail.com
Eritsyan K.Y., PhD in Psychology, Researcher, National Research University "Higher School of Economics", St.Petersburg, Russia, ksenia.eritsyan@gmail.com
Tsvetkova L.A., PhD in Psychology, Vice-rector for research, Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia, St.Petersburg, Russia, ltsvetkova@herzen.spb.ru
Abstract
Worldwide significant efforts are invested in building biobanks—specialized facilities for storing biological materials for research and medical purposes. The successful functioning of biobanks depends directly on people’s willingness to donate their biological materials. Fragmentary empirical studies of people’s attitudes toward donations to biobanks have been undertaken in Russia. The goal of this study was to measure at titudes toward biobank donation among Russians population and to evaluate potential sociopsychological factors that play a role in a person’s readiness to become a donor. Data from 542 students and 254 scientific staff at St. Petersburg State University were collected from group-administered paper-and-pencil and online surveys respectively. Both students (74%) and scientific staff (52%) indicated a relatively high level of readiness to become biobank donors. Regression analysis showed that refusal to be a biobahk donor was correlated significantly with being university scientific staff vs. students, no previous awareness about biobank, need for relative’s or friend’s opinion before decision making, presence of payment for donation and type of requested biological material.

Keywords: prosocial behavior, biobank, public attitude, willingness to donate, students, university staff, cross-sectional study

Column: Applied Research and Practice

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17759/sps.2019100110

Funding

Data collection was supported by grant Russian Science Foundation (project No14-50-00069), St. Petersburg State University. Data analysis and publication was also supported by National Research University Higher School of Economics.

For Reference

References
  1. Zinchenko Yu.P., Ryzhov A.L., Tkhostov A.Sh., Bryzgalina E.V. Problemy otsenivaniya psikhologicheskikh kharakteristik donorov biobanka: nauchnye i prakticheskie aspekty [Problems of evaluating the psychological characteristics of biobank donors: scientific and practical aspects]. Rossiiskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal [Russian Psychological Journal], 2016. Vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 140—151.
  2. Krushelnitskaya O.B., Marinova T.Y., Milekhin A.V. Young people’s attitudes towards their health and blood donation. Sotsial’naia psikhologiia i obshchestvo [Social Psychology and Society], 2017. Vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 126—143. doi:10.17759/sps.2017080108 (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.).
  3. Reznik O.N., Kuz’min D.O., Skvortsov A.E., Reznik A.O. Biobanki — neotsenimyi resurs transplantatsii. Istoriya, sovremennoe sostoyanie, perspektivy [Biobanks are an invaluable transplantation resource. History, current state, prospects]. Vestnik transplantologii i iskusstvennyh organov [Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs], 2016. Vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 123—132. doi:10.15825/1995-1191-2016-4-123-132
  4. Trofimov N.A. Otrasl’ biobankov v blizhaishem budushchem [Biobanks industry in the near future]. Nauka za rubezom [Global Science Review]. 2012. Vol. 13, pp. 1—13.
  5. Armitage C.J., Conner M. Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. British journal of social psychology, 2001. Vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 471—499.
  6. Bagot K.L., Murray A.L., Masser B.M. How can we improve retention of the first-time donor? A systematic review of the current evidence. Transfusion medicine reviews, 2016. Vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 81—91.
  7. Batson C.D. A history of prosocial behavior research. In A.W. Kruglanski & W. Stroebe (Eds.). Handbook of the history of social psychology. New York, NY, US: Psychology Press, 2012, pp. 243—264.
  8. Bednall T.C., Bove L.L., Cheetham A., Murray A.L. A systematic review and meta-analysis of antecedents of blood donation behavior and intentions. Social science and medicine, 2013. Vol. 96, pp. 86—94.
  9. Bryzgalina E.V., Ryzhov A.L., Tikhomandritskaya O.A., Tkhostov A.S., Zinchenko Y.P. Biobanking — a new environment for psychological research and applications. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 2017, no. 10, pp. 163—177.
  10. Budimir D., Polašek O., Marušić A., Kolčić I., Zemunik T., Boraska V., ... Rudan I. Ethical aspects of human biobanks: a systematic review. Croatian medical journal, 2011. Vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 262—279.
  11. Engels E.M. Biobanks as basis for personalised nutrition? Mapping the ethical issues. Genes Nutrition, 2007. Vol. 2, pp. 59—62. doi:10.1007/s12263-007-0006-9
  12. Hansson M.G. Ethics and biobanks. British Journal of Cancer, 2009. Vol. 100, pp. 8—12. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604795
  13. Hoeyer K. The ethics of research biobanking: a critical review of the literature. Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Reviews, 2008. Vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 429—452.
  14. Lee C.I. et al. Patients’ willingness to participate in a breast cancer biobank at screening mammogram. Breast cancer research and treatment, 2012. Vol. 136, no. 3, pp. 899—906.
  15. Lipworth W., Forsyth R., Kerridge I. Tissue donation to biobanks: a review of sociological studies. Sociology of health & illness. 2011. Vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 792—811.
  16. Riegman P.H., Morente M.M., Betsou F., de Blasio P., Geary P., Marble Biobanking for better healthcare. Molecular Oncology, 2008. Vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 213—222.
  17. Thompson S.G., Willeit P. UK Biobank comes of age. The Lancet, 2015. Vol. 386 (9993), pp. 509—510.
  18. Tsvetkova L.A., Eritsyan K.Y., Antonova N.A. Russian students’ awareness of and attitudes toward donating to biobanks. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 2016, no. 9 (2), pp. 30–38. doi:10.11621/pir.2016.0203

 

comments powered by Disqus
 
About PsyJournals.ru

© 1997–2019 Portal of Russian Psychological Publications. All rights reserved

PsyJournals.ru in Russian

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Catalogue of academic journals in psychology & education MSUPE

Creative Commons License

RSS Psyjournals at facebook Psyjournals at Twitter Psyjournals at Youtube Яндекс.Метрика