Russian Psychological Issues PsyJournals.ru
OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS
JournalsTopicsAuthorsEditor's Choice For AuthorsAbout PsyJournals.ruContact Us

  Previous issue (2019. Vol. 10, no. 2)

Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)

Social Psychology and Society

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

ISSN (printed version): 2221-1527

ISSN (online): 2311-7052

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17759/sps

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Started in 2010

Published quarterly

Free of fees
Open Access Journal

 

Attitudes to global risks students of orthodox and secular universities 73

Emelyanova T.P., Doctor of Psychology, Professor, Leader research officer, Laboratory of Social and Economic psychology, Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, t_emelyanova@inbox.ru
Belykh T.V., PhD, Leading Specialist of the Center for Competences on Safety Culture and Reliability of the Human Factor, Rosatom Technical Academy, Obninsk, Russia, pochta806@rambler.ru
Abstract
The study is devoted to the problem of comparing attitudes towards global risks among students of different mentality (religious and secular). It was assumed that this attitude varies in a number of components and forms links with identity and tolerance for uncertainty. Respondents: students of an Orthodox university (58 people at the age of 17—29 years old, of which 52% are girls, 48% are boys) and students of a secular university (69 people at the age of 16—31 years old, of whom 71% are girls, 29% are young men). The study used a questionnaire method using the techniques: “Attitude to global risks”, “Tolerance to uncertainty”, “Social identity”. Data was processed in the SPSS 20.0 program. The hypothesis was partially confirmed. Religious authoritarianism as a strategy to prevent global risks by returning to traditional values and controlling citizens is higher for Orthodox students. For secular students, it is more typical to see threats from a fatalistic point of view and to believe in the possibility of preventing global disasters by maintaining a balance of power, cooperation and compromises. Significant relationships of risk attitudes with tolerance to uncertainty and identity are found.

Keywords: religious and secular mentality, global risks, social identity, tolerance to uncertainty.

Column: Empirical Research

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17759/sps.2019100303

Funding

This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (project № 18-18-00439 “Human psychology in the context of global risks”)

For Reference

References

 

  1. Daudrih N.I. Social’naja identichnost’: metodicheskij aspekt [Social identity: methodical aspect]. Sociologija [Sociology], 2000, no. 12, pp. 77—95.
  2. Kitova D.A., Zhuravlev A.L. Global’nye protsessy kak ob”ekt sotsial’no-psikhologicheskogo issledovaniya [Global processes as an object of socio-psychological research]. Chelovecheskii faktor: Sotsial’nyi psikholog [The human factor. Social psychologist], 2017, no. 2 (34), pp. 307—314.
  3. Leont’ev D.A. Vyzov neopredelennosti kak central’naja problema psihologii lichnosti [Jelektronnyj resurs] [The challenge of uncertainty as the central problem of personality psychology]. Psihologicheskie issledovanija [Psychological research], 2015. Vol. 8, no. 40, p. 2. URL: http://psystudy.ru (Accessed 15.06.2019).
  4. Lumann N. Ponyatie riska [Concept of risk]. THESIS [THESIS], 1994, no. 5, pp. 135— 60.
  5. Nestik T.A., Zhuravlev A.L. Otnoshenie k global’nym riskam: social’no-psihologicheskij analiz [Attitude to global risks: a socio-psychological analysis]. Psihologicheskij zhurnal [Psychological Journal], 2018. Vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 127—138.
  6. Rjazancev I.P., Podlesnaja M.A., Kozlov I.I. Fenomenologija pravoslavnyh cennostej v ocenke jekspertov [The phenomenology of Orthodox values in the evaluation of experts]. Sociologicheskie issledovanija [Sociological studies], 2014, no. 8, pp. 128—135.
  7. Soldatova G.U., Shajgerova L.A. Psihodiagnostika tolerantnosti lichnosti [Psychodiagnostics of tolerance]. M.: Smysl. 2008. 172 p.
  8. Sotsial’no-psikhologicheskaya otsenka riskov sovremennoi real’nosti: ochevidnoe i veroyatnoe [Socio-psychological risk assessment of modern reality: the obvious and probable]. Belobrykina O.A. (scien. ed.). Novosibirsk: Publ. NGPU, 2017. 113 p.
  9. Khukhlaev O.E., Shorokhova V.A. Research on Religious Identity of Orthodoxy Youth. Sotsial’naia psikhologiia i obshchestvo [Social Psychology and Society], 2016. Vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 35—50. doi:10.17759/sps.2016070203 (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)
  10. Bostrom N., Cirkovic M.M. Introduction.Global Catastrophic Risks. Bostrom N., Cirkovic M.M. (ed.). L.-N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 2008, pp. 1—29.

 

comments powered by Disqus
 
About PsyJournals.ru

© 2007–2019 Portal of Russian Psychological Publications. All rights reserved

PsyJournals.ru in Russian

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Catalogue of academic journals in psychology & education MSUPE

Creative Commons License

RSS Psyjournals at facebook Psyjournals at Twitter Psyjournals at Youtube Яндекс.Метрика