Russian Psychological Issues PsyJournals.ru
OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS
JournalsTopicsAuthorsEditor's Choice For AuthorsAbout PsyJournals.ruContact Us

  Previous issue (2019. Vol. 10, no. 2)

Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)

Social Psychology and Society

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

ISSN (printed version): 2221-1527

ISSN (online): 2311-7052

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17759/sps

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Started in 2010

Published quarterly

Free of fees
Open Access Journal

 

The test of emotional intelligence — a russian-speaking method 308

Sergienko E.A., Doctor of Psychology, leading researcher, Institute of psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, elenas13@mail.ru
Khlevnaya E.A., PhD in Economics, Professor of the Educational and Scientific Center "Economics and Finance", Department of financial management, G.V. Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Moscow, Russia, elankha@yandex.ru
Vetrova I.I., PhD, Researcher of the Laboratory of the developmental psychology, Institute of Psychology RAS, Moscow, Russia, stranavetra@gmail.com
Nikitina A.A., Methodologist-Psychologist, International centre Creative Consulting Technologies, Moscow, Russia, nikitina@mc-ktk.ru
Abstract
The paper describes the work on the adaptation of the MSCEIT v.2.0 methodology and the development of other methods within the framework of the model of emotional intelligence as ability that diminish sociocultural differences and specificity of stimuli when used in samples other than American ones. The article refers to the procedure for development and standardization of a new reliable psychodiagnostic Russian-speaking method for measurement of the level of development of emotional intelligence of a person. The TEI-method is based on the model of emotional intelligence as an ability by J. Mayer, P. Salovey and D. Caruso and the psychoevolutionary theory of emotions by R. Plutchik. According to the ability model, EI is defined as the ability to process information contained in emotions. In the process of creating a new methodology for measuring emotional intelligence — the TEI-method — the shortcomings of the standardization process of the Russian version of MSCEIT v.2.0 were identified, most of which were culturally specific. These shortcomings were taken into account. 1007 people aged 20 to 72 years (487 men and 520 women, average age 35.9 years) took part in the psychometric testing of the TEI-method. The differences of the TEI and the MSCEIT v.2.0 are described. The TEI-method demonstrates a satisfactory level of basic psychometric indicators of validity and reliability.

Keywords: emotional intelligence, ability, psychodiagnostics, test, approbation of a method, validity, reliability, standardization of a method

Column: Methodological Tools

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17759/sps.2019100311

Funding

This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research № 19-013-00085.

For Reference

References

 

  1. Matthews G., Lyusin D.V., Zeidner M., Roberts R.D. Emotsional’nyi intellekt: problemy teorii, izmereniya i primeneniya na praktike [Emotional Intelligence: Theory, Measures, and Applications]. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal VShE [Psychology, HSE], 2004. Vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 3—26.
  2. Sergienko E.A., Vetrova I.I. Russkoyazychnaya adaptatsiya testa Dzh. Mayera, P. Saloveya, D. Karuzo «Emotsional’nyi intellekt» (MSCEIT V2.0) [Russian adaptation of the test J. Mayer, P. Salovey and D. Caruso «Emotional Intelligence» (MSCEIT V2.0)]. Moscow: Smysl, 2017, 140 p.
  3. Sergienko E.A., Khlevnaya E.A., Vetrova I.I., Kiseleva T.S. Sozdanie i psikhometricheskaya proverka metodiki izmereniya emotsional’nogo intellekta (TEI) [Creation and psychometric validation of methods for measuring emotional intelligence — TEI]. Kazanskii pedagogicheskii zhurnal [Kazan Pedagogical Journal], 2017, no. 3, pp. 114—117.
  4. Sergienko E.A., Hlevnaya E.A., Vetrova I.I., Kiseleva T.S. Faktornaya i strukturnaya validnost’ metodiki TEI (test emocional’nogo intellekta) [Factor and structural validity of the TEI (emotional intelligence test)]. Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pedagogika. Psihologiya. Sociokinetika [Vestnik of Kostroma State University. Series: Pedagogy. Psychology. Sociokinetics], 2017, no. 3, pp. 33—36.
  5. Shahovskij V.I. Chto takoe lingvistika emocij [What is the linguistics of emotions]. Mir lingvistiki i kommunikacii [World of Linguistics and Communication], 2008, no. 3 (12), pp. 22—30.
  6. Shahovskij V.I. Emocional’nye kul’turnye koncepty: paralleli i kontrasty [Emotional cultural concepts: Parallels and contrasts]. In Karasik V.I. (ed.). Yazykovaya lichnost’: kul’turnye aspekty: sb. nauch. tr. [Language personality: cultural aspects]. Volgograd: Volg. gos. ped. un-t, 1996, pp. 80—96.
  7. Blum D., Holling H. Spearman’s law of diminishing returns. A meta-analysis. Intelligence, 2017. Vol. 65, pp. 60—66. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2017.07.004
  8. Curci A., Lanciano T., Soleti E., Salovey P., Zammuner V.L. Construct validity of the Italian version of the Mayer—Salovey—Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) v2.0. Journal of Personality Assessment, 2013. Vol. 95, pp. 486—494.
  9. Jordan P.J., Lawrence S.A. Emotional intelligence in teams: development and initial validation of the workgroup emotional intelligence profile — short version (WEIP-S). Journal of Management & Organization, 2009. Vol. 15, pp. 452—469. doi:10.1017/ S1833367200002546
  10. Mayer J.D., Salovey P., Caruso D.R. Mayer—Salovey—Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) user’s manual. Canada, Toronto, MHS Publishers, 2002, 131 p.
  11. Mayer J.D., Salovey P., Caruso D.R. The Ability Model of Emotional Intelligence: Principles and Updates. Emotion Review, 2016. Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 290—300. doi:10.1177/1754073916639667
  12. Plutchik R. A general psychoevolutionary theory of emotion. In Plutchik R., Kellerman H. (eds.) Emotion: Theory, research, and experience. Vol. 1. New York: Academic, 1980, pp. 3—33.
  13. Wong C.-S., Law K.S. The effects of leader and follower emotional intelligence on performance and attitude: an exploratory study. The Leadership Quarterly, 2002. Vol. 13 (3), pp. 243—274. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00099-1
comments powered by Disqus
 
About PsyJournals.ru

© 2007–2019 Portal of Russian Psychological Publications. All rights reserved

PsyJournals.ru in Russian

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Catalogue of academic journals in psychology & education MSUPE

Creative Commons License

RSS Psyjournals at facebook Psyjournals at Twitter Psyjournals at Youtube Яндекс.Метрика