Discriminability of verbal and non-verbal methods of assessment of aggression

Voronin A.N.; Luchinina E.V.

Experimental Psychology (Russia) - №4 / 2020 | Перейти к описанию

Previous issue (2020. Vol. 13, no. 3)

Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)

Experimental Psychology (Russia)

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

ISSN (printed version): 2072-7593

ISSN (online): 2311-7036

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Started in 2008

Published quarterly

Free of fees
Open Access Journal

RU In Russian

Experimental Psychology (Russia)
2011. Vol. 4, no. 1, 85–99
ISSN: 2072-7593 / 2311-7036 (online)

Discriminability of verbal and non-verbal methods of assessment of aggression ¹⁹⁸⁵

Voronin A.N.
Doctor of Psychology, Chief Researcher, Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6612-9726
e-mail: voroninan@bk.ru

Luchinina E.V.
Postgraduate Student, State Academic University of Humanities
e-mail: luchinina.katerina@gmail.com

PDF (ENG)

Efficiency of discrimination between types of aggression tested with traditional psycho-diagnostic methods and using the content analysis of written speech was studied experimentally. The efficiency of assessment of outer aggression is shown to rise when traditional methods are used, whereas the efficiency of auto-aggression rises when the content analysis is used. The paper describes most significant indices of aggression and auto-aggression revealed in the use of both traditional methods and the analysis of the participants’ written speech.

Keywords: aggression, auto-aggression, content analysis

Column: Experimental Methodology

For Reference

Voronin A.N., Luchinina E.V. Discriminability of verbal and non-verbal methods of assessment of aggression . Eksperimental'naâ psihologiâ = Experimental Psychology (Russia), 2011. Vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 85–99.

Almaev N. A. Intencional’nye struktury ponimanija suzhdenij // Poznanie. Obschestvo. Razvitie. M., Institut psihologii RAN, 1996.
Bandura A., Uolters R. Podrostkovaja agressija. Izuchenie vlijanija vospitanija i semejnyh otnoshenij. M., 1990.
Bek A., Rash A., Sho B., Jemeri G. Kognitivnaja terapija depresii. SPb.: Piter, 2003.
Berkovic L. Agressija: prichiny, posledstvija i kontrol’. SPb., 2001.
Bjeron R., Richardson D. Agressija. SPb., 1997.
Venger A. L. Psihologicheskie risunochnye testy: illjustrirovannoe rukovodstvo. M.: VLADOS-PRESS, 2006.
Godfrua Zh. Chto takoe psihologija. T. 2. M., 1992.
Drozdov A. Yu. Agressivnoye povedeniye molodezhi v kontekste socialnoy situacii // Soc. iss. 2003. № 4.
Ivanchenko V. N., Asmolov A. G., Enikolopov S. N. Ustanovki lichnosti i protivopravnoe povedenie // Voprosy psihologii. 1991. № 2.
Kretti B. Dzh. Psihologija v sovremennom sporte. M., 1978.
Lorenc K. Agressija: tak nazyvaemoe «zlo». M., 1994.
Mak-Daugoll U. Razlichenie emocii i chuvstva // Psihologija emocij. M.: Izd. MGU, 1984.
Mojer K. Hirurgija agressii // Lit. gazeta. 1973. 13 fevralja. S. 6.
Piljagina G. Ya. Autoagressija: biologicheskaja celesoobraznost’ ili psihologicheskij vybor? // Tavricheskij zhurnal psihiatrii. 1999. T. 3. № 3.
Poltavec V. I., Belinskaja M. K. Problemy psihiatrii v svjazi s religioznym bumom na Ukraine konca 80-h – nachala 90-h godov // Vestnik Associacii psihiatrov Ukrainy. Kiev, 1994 (na ukr. jaz.).
Prakticheskaja psihodiagnostika. Metodiki i testy: Uchebnoe posobie // Pod red. D. Ya. Rajgorodskogo. M., 2006.
Rean A. A. Agressija i agressivnost’ lichnosti // Psihologicheskij zhurnal. 1996. T. 17. № 5.
Romanova E. S., Potemkina O. F. Graficheskie metody v psihologicheskoj diagnostike. M.: «Didakt», 1992.
Rotenberg V. S., Arshavskij V. V. Poiskovaja aktivnost’ i adaptacija. M.: Nauka, 1984.
Safuanov F. S. Psihologija kriminal’noj agressii // Psihologicheskij zhurnal. 1999. T. 20. № 6.
Frejd Z. Po tu storonu principa udovol’stvija // Psihologija bessoznatel’nogo. M., 1989.
Hekhauzen H. Agressija // Motivacija i dejatel’nost’. T. 1. M., 1986.
Horni K. Nevroticheskaja lichnost’ nashego vremeni. Samoanaliz. M., 1994.