Previous issue (2020. Vol. 13, no. 1)
Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)
|
|
The role of interhemispheric asymmetry in sensorimotor measurements оf perceptual illusions 1162
Karpinskaya V.Yu.
Cand. Sci. in Psychology, Senior Lecturer of the Department of Psychology,
St. Petersburg State University Lyahovetsky V.A.
Pavlov Institute of Physiology, RAS, Laboratory of Physiology of Movements
The role of interhemispheric asymmetry in the conscious control of sensorimotor measurements оf Muller-Lyer illusion was investigated. We used the illusion of perception as a phenomenon of consciousness to find out how an error value depends on the left and right hemisphere contribution to control in decision-making. We compared the precision of the left and right hand’s movements on touchscreens during the measurement of the segments lengths. It was found that the left and right hand controlled by two hemispheres by different ways had made different errors during these measurements. The constant bias of the right hand’s movements is larger than for the left one. The conclusion is that the hemisphere mostly involved in movement control determines the dominant system of representation (metric and categorical) and the control’s type in decision-making (automatic or conscious). The increase or decrease of the accuracy of the illusory object measurement depends on the increase or decrease of the conscious control.
Keywords: illusions of perception, interhemispheric asymmetry, conscious control, visual-motor coordination
Column: Psychology of Perception
-
Allahverdov V. M. Opyt teoreticheskoj psihologii.
SPb.: Pechatnyj dvor, 1993.
-
Bernshtejn N. A. Ocherki po fiziologii dvizhenij i
fiziologii aktivnosti. M.: Medicina, 1966.
-
Bobrova E. V., Ljahoveckij V. A., Borwevskaja E. R.
Rol' pravoj ruki v zapominanii prostranstvennoj uporjadochennosti celej pri
vosproizvedenii posledovatel'nosti dvizhenij // Zhurnal vysshej nervnoj
dejatel'nosti. 2010. T. 60. № 2. S. 162–165.
-
Bondarko V. M., Danilova M. V. Ocenka razmera kruga
v illjuzii Jebbinghauza // Sensornye sistemy. 2000. T. 14. № 4. S.
277–287.
-
Bondarko V. M., Semenov L. A. Ocenka razmera v
illjuzii Jebbinghauza u vzroslyh i detej razlichnogo vozrasta // Fiziologija
cheloveka. 2004. T. 30. № 1. S. 31–37.
-
Bulatov A., Bertulis A., Bulatova N. Processy
lokal'nogo usrednenija v illjuzii Mjullera-Lajera // Sensornye sistemy. 2007.
T. 21. № 1. S. 10–18.
-
Gregori R. L. Glaz i mozg / Perev. s angl. M.:
Progress, 1970.
-
LjahoveckiyV. A., Bobrova E. V. Vosproizvedenie
zapomnennoj posledovatel'nosti dvizhenij pravoj i levoj ruki: pozicionnoe i
vektornoe kodirovanie // Zhurnal vysshej nervnoj dejatel'nosti. 2009. T. 59. №
1. S. 33–42.
-
Miller Dzh., Galanter E., Pribram K. Plany i
struktura povedenija. M.: Progress, 1964.
-
Moroshkina N. V., Gershkovich V. A. Soznatel'nyj
kontrol' v mnemicheskih zadachah i zadachah nauchenija// Vestnik SPbGU. Serija
12. 2008. Vyp. 2. S. 91–100.
-
Moroshkina N. V. Soznatel'nyj kontrol' v zadachah
nauchenija, ili Kak nauchit'sja ne osoznavat' ochevidnoe // Jeksperimental'naja
psihologija soznanija: kognitivnaja logika soznatel'nogo i bessoznatel'nogo.
SPb.: Izd. SPbGU, 2006.
-
Bruno N. When does action resist visual illusions? //
Trends in Сognitive Sciences. 2001. V. 5. № 9. P. 379–382.
-
Bruno N., Bernardis P., Gentilucci M. Visually guided
pointing, the Müller-Lyer illusion, and the functional interpretation of the
dorsal-ventral split: conclusions from 33 independent studies // Neuroscience
and Biobehavioural Reviews. 2008. V. 32. № 3. P. 423–437.
-
Carey D. Do action systems resist visual illusions? //
Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2001. V. 5. № 3. P. 109–113.
-
Coren S., Hoenig P. Effect of non-target stimuli upon
length of voluntary saccades // Percept. Mot. Skills. 1972. V. 34 № 2. Р.
499–508.
-
Gentilucci M., Daprati E., Gantigano M., Toni I. Eye
position tunes the contribution of allocentric and egocentric information to
target localization in human goal-directed arm movements // Neuroscience
Letters. 1997. V. 222. P. 123–126.
-
Gillam B. Geometrical Illusions // Scientific
American. 1980. V. 242. Р. 102–111.
-
Ginsburg A. P. Visual form perception based on
biological filtering // Sensory Experience, Adaptation and Perception /Eds. L.
Spilman, G. R. Wooten. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, N.J., 1984. Р.
53–72.
-
Grafton S.T., Hazeltine E., Ivry R.B. Motor sequence
learning with the nondominant left hand. A PET functional imaging study // Exp.
Brain Res. 2002. V. 146. P. 369–378.
-
Jager G., Postma A. On the hemispheric specialization
for categorical and coordinate spatial relations: a review of the current
evidence // Neuropsychologia. 2003. V. 41. № 4. P. 504–515.
-
Morgan M. J. The Poggendorff illusion: a bias in the
estimation of the orientation of virtual lines by second- stage filter //
Vision Res. 1999. V. 39. Р. 2361–2380.
-
Oldfield R. C. The assessment and analysis of
handedness: the Edinburgh inventory // Neuropsychologia. 1971. V. 1. P.
97–113.
-
Walker E. H. A mathematical theory of optical
illusions and figural aftereffects // Percept. Psychophys. 1973. V. 13. P.
467–486.
-
Ward L. M.,. Porac C, Coren S., Girgus J. S. The case
for misapplied constancy scaling: depth associations elicited by illusion
configurations // Am. J. Psychol. 1977. V. 90 № 4. Р. 609–620.
|
|
