Previous issue (2020. Vol. 13, no. 1)
Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)
|
|
Recognition of facial expressions in the proximal periphery of the visual field 1082
Barabanschikov V.A.
Doctor of Psychology, Director of the Institute of Experimental Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education , Moscow, Russia
e-mail: vladimir.barabanschikov@gmail.com Zhegallo A.V.
PhD in Psychology, Research associate, Laboratory of Psychological Systems Studies, Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences; Research associate, Institute for Experimental Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia
e-mail: zhegs@mail.ru
Experimental study of the communicative organization of visual space in micro intervals of time is the subject of this paper. During the experiment, images of basic expressions of male face in the form of undifferentiated presentation of eccentrically localized objects (0 ° – 10 °) in the left, right, top and bottom parts of the field of view were shown to the observer for 200 ms. The results of evaluation of the effectiveness of the modality of identification of facial expressions at different exposure conditions and registration of oculomotor activity of observers indicate that the area of effective perception of facial expressions goes beyond the central area of the visual field, covering a considerable part of the proximal periphery. Estimation of parameters of the zone with the most effective perception of facial expressions, which are reflected in the characteristics of targeted saccades, suggests that the internal structure of visual space is heterogeneous, and its value depends not only on the egocentric location of expression, but also on their modality. Micro dynamics of communicative visual space depends on the form of the oculomotor activity of observers.
Keywords: communicative visual space, recognition of expressions of faces, oculomotor activity, latency of saccades, the center and the periphery of the field of view, localization of visual fixations, the area of effective perception of facial expressions
Column: Psychology of Perception
- Barabanschikov V. A. Vosprijatie i sobytie. SPb.: Aletejja,
2002.
- Barabanschikov V. A. Vosprijatie vyrazhenij lica. M.: IPRAN,
2009.
- Barabanschikov V. A. Ekspressii lica i ih vosprijatie. M.: IPRAN,
2012.
- Barabanschikov V. A., Belopol'skij V. I. Stabil'nost' vidimogo mira.
M.: Kogito-Centr, 2008.
- Barabanschikov V. A., Zhegallo A. V., Ivanova L. A. Raspoznavanie
ekspressij perevernutogo izobrazhenija lica // Eksperimental'naja psihologija.
2010. № 3. S. 66–83.
- Barabanschikov V. A., Zhegallo A. V. Zavisimost' vosprijatija
jekspressij ot prostranstvennoj orientacii izobrazhenij lica // Sovremennaja
eksperimental'naja psihologija. M.: IPRAN, 2012. T. 2. S. 55–79.
- Gibson Dzh. Ekologicheskij podhod k zritel'nomu vosprijatiju. M.:
Progress, 1988.
- Izard K. Psihologija emocij. SPb.: Piter, 2000.
- Kompanejskij B. N. Problema konstantnosti vosprijatija cveta i formy
veshhej: doktorskaja dissertacija // Uchenye zapiski Leningradskogo
gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo instituta im. A. I. Gercena. L., 1940. T. 34.
S. 17–179.
- Mirakjan A. I. Konstantnost' i polifunkcional'nost' vosprijatija.
M.: PI RAO, 1992.
- Mitrani L. Sakkadicheskie dvizhenija glaz. Sofija: Izdatel'stvo
Bolgarskoj akademii nauk, 1973.
- Hrisanfova L. A. Dinamika vosprijatija jekspressij lica: Diss. …
kand. psihol. nauk. M.: IP RAN, 2004.
- Ekman P. Psihologija emocij. SPb.: Piter, 2010.
- Asato M. R., Sweeney J. A., Luna B. Cognitive processes in the
development of TOL performance // Neuropsychologia. 2006. V. 44. P.
2259–2269.
- Amlot R., Walker R., Driver J., Spence C. Multimodal
visual–somatosensory integration in saccade generation // Neuropsychologia.
2003. V. 41. P. 1–15.
- Coren S., Hoenig P. Effect of non-targeting stimuli upon the length
of voluntary saccades // Perceptual and motor Skill. 1972. V. 34. P.
499–508.
- Crevist L., Van den Abbeele D., Audenaert K., Goethals M., Dierick
M. Effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on saccades in
depression: A pilot study // Psychiatry Research. 2005. V. 35. P. 113–119.
- Eenshuistra R. M., Ridderinkhof K. R., Weidema M. A., van der Molen M.
W. Developmental changes in oculomotor control and working-memory
efficiency //Acta Psychologica. 2007. V. 124. P. 139–158.
- Edwards D. S., Goolkasian P. A. Periferal vision location and kinds
of complex processing // Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1974. V. 3. P.
477–486.
- Findlay J. M. Visual information processing for saccadic eye
movements // Spatially oriented behavior. NY.: Springer, 1983. P. 281–303.
- Kandel E., Schwartz J., Jessell T. Principles of Neural Science.
NY.: McGraw-Hill, 2000.
- Klein С., Fischer B. Instrumental and test–retest
reliability of saccadic measures // Biological Psychology. 2005. V. 68. P.
201–213.
- Komogortsev O., Gobert D, Jayarathna S., Koh D., Gowda S.
Standardization of Automated Analyses of Oculomotor Fixation and Saccadic
Behaviors // IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 2010. V. 57.
№. 11. P. 2635–2645.
- Palmer S. E. Visual science: photons to phenomenology. Cambridge,
Massachusets: MIT Press, 2002. R Development Core Team. R: A language and
environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing,
Vienna, 2012.
- Trottier L., Pratt J. Visual processing of targets can reduce
saccadic latencies // Vision Research. 2005. V. 45. P. 1349–1354.
- Van der Stigchel S., Meeter M., Theeuwes J. Top-down influences make
saccades deviate away: The case of endogenous cues // Acta Psychologica. 2007.
V. 125. P. 279–290.
- Van Zoest W., Donk M. Awareness of the saccade goal in oculomotor
selection: Your eyes go before you know // Consciousness and Cognition. 2010.
V. 19. P. 861–871.
|
|
