Russian Psychological Issues
JournalsTopicsAuthorsEditor's Choice For AuthorsAbout PsyJournals.ruContact Us
Experimental Psychology (Russia) - №1 / 2021 | Перейти к описанию
Web of Science СС

  Previous issue (2020. Vol. 13, no. 4)


Experimental Psychology (Russia)

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

ISSN (printed version): 2072-7593

ISSN (online): 2311-7036


License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Started in 2008

Published quarterly

Free of fees
Open Access Journal


Comparative psychological aspects of ontogenetic development of behavior: A review of experimental studies 1620


Reznikova J.I.
Doctor of Biology, Professor, Senior Research Associate, Institute of Animal Systematics and Ecology, SB RAS, Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russia

One of the most interesting unsolved problems in cognitive ethology studies is associated with the interaction of hereditarily determined behavioral patterns and the skills based on individual and social experience, and with the ability to apply the results of this interaction to new situations. Human intellect may be characterized by outstanding versatility. Representatives of different animal species exhibit extremely complex forms of cognitive activity, but within very narrow domains. Cognitive behavior is based on a set of features, which include species-specific filtering of stimuli, innate tendency to form certain associative links and prohibit the formation of other, genetically determined set of stereotypes, early experience. Speciesspecific limitations shape specialized cognitive development in different species, including humans.

Keywords: cognitive ethology, comparative psychology, behavioral patterns, training, predisposition, ontogeny of behavior, early experience, imprinting

Column: Comparative Psychology


For Reference

  1. Albert F. W., Somel M., Carneiro M., Aximu-Petri A., Halbwax M., Thalmann O. et al. A comparison of brain gene expression levels in domesticated and wild animals. PLoS Genetics, 2012, vol. 8 (9). doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002962.
  2. Atsarkina N. V., Yakovlev I. K., Reznikova Zh. I. Individual’nye povedencheskie kharakteristiki razvedchikov i mobilizovannykh furazhirov u ryzhikh lesnykh murav’ev [Individual behavioural features of scouts and recruits in red wood ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)]. Evroaziatskii entomologicheskii zhurnal [Euroasian Entomological Journal], 2014, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 209–218.
  3. Bard K. A., Myowa-Yamakoshi M., Tomonaga M., Tanaka M., Quinn J., Costall A., Matsuzawa T. Group differences in the mutual gaze of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Developmental Psychology, 2005, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 616–624. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.41.4.616.
  4. Bluff L. A., Weir A. A. S., Rutz C., Wimpenny J. H., Kacelnik A. Tool-related cognition in New Caledonian crows. Comparative Cognition and Behavior Reviews, 2007, vol. 2, pp. 1–25.
  5. Bolnik D. I., Svanback R., Fordyce J. A., Yang L. H., Davis J. M., Hulsey C. D., Forister M. L. The ecology of individuals: incidence and implications of individual specialization. American Naturalist, 2003, vol. 161, pp. 1–28. doi:10.1086/343878.
  6. Bonnie K. E., de Waal F. B. M. Affiliation promotes the transmission of a social custom: handclasp grooming among captive chimpanzees. Primates, 2006, vol. 47, pp. 27–34. doi:10.1007/s10329-005-0141-0.
  7. Bowlby J. Attachment and loss. New York, Basic Books, 1982. 425 p.
  8. Breland K., Breland M. The misbehavior of organisms. American Psychologist, 1961, vol. 16, pp. 681–684. doi:10.1037/h0040090.
  9. Brown M. F., Cook R. G. (Eds.). Animal Spatial Cognition: Comparative, Neural, and Computational Approaches. In cooperation with Comparative Cognition Press of the Comparative Cognition Society November, 2006. URL: (date of access: 25.01.2015).
  10. Burlak C. A. Proiskhozhdenie yazyka: Fakty, issledovaniya, gipotezy [The origin of language. Facts, research, hypothesis]. Moscow, Astrel’ CORPUS, 2011. 464 p.
  11. Byrne R. W., Whiten A. Machiavellian intelligence II: Extensions and evaluations. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1997. 1–23 p.
  12. Chauvin R. Ethology: the biological study of animal behavior / Translated by Joyce Diamanti. N. Y., International Universities Press, 1977. 245 p.
  13. Chomsky N. Language and mind. New York, Harcourt, Brace and World, 1968. 342 p. doi:10.1037/ e400082009-004.
  14. Chomsky N. On Nature and Language. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2002. 206 p. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511613876.
  15. DeLoache J. S., LoBue V. The narrow fellow in the grass: Human infants associate snakes and fear. Developmental Science, 2009, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 201–207. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00753.x.
  16. Dorosheva E. A., Reznikova Zh. I. An experimental study of behavioral mechanisms of relationships between red wood ants and ground beetles. Entomological Review, 2006, vol. 86, no. 2. pp. 139–148. doi:10.1134/S0013873806020035
  17. Firsov L. A. Doverbal’nyi yazyk obez’yan [Preverbal language monkeys]. Zhurnal evolyutsionnoi biokhimii I fiziologii [Journal of Evolutionary Biochemistry and Physiology], 1983, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 381–389.
  18. Gardner H. Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York, Basic Book, 1983. 440 p.
  19. Goodall J. In the shadow of man. Boston, Houghton Mifflin Publishing, 1971. 279 p.
  20. Göth A. Innate predator recognition in Australian brush-turkey (Alectura lathami, Megapodidae) hatchlings. Behaviour, 2001, vol. 138, pp. 117–136.
  21. Göth A., Evans C. S. Social responses without early experience: Australian brush-turkey chicks use specific visual cues to aggregate with conspecifics. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2004, vol. 207, pp. 2199–2208. doi:10.1242/jeb.01062.
  22. Gottfredson L. S. The general intelligence factor. Scientific American Presents, 1998, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 24–29.
  23. Gould J. L., Marler P. Learning by instinct. Scientific American, 1987, vol. 256, pp. 74–85. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0187-74.
  24. Griffin A. S., Evans C. S., Blumstein D. T. Selective learning in a Marsupial. Ethology, 2002, vol. 108, pp. 1103–1114. doi:10.1046/j.1439-0310.2002.00840.x.
  25. Harlow H. Learning to love. San Francisco, Albion Publishing Company, 1971. 122 p.
  26. Heinroth O. Beträge zur Biologie, näm entlich Ethologie und Physiologie der Anatiden, verhandlungen der V Internazionale Ornithologische Kongress. Berlin, 1911, pp. 589–702.
  27. Herrnstein R. J., Loveland D. H. Complex visual concept in the pigeon. Science, 1964, vol. 146, pp. 549–551. doi:10.1126/science.146.3643.549.
  28. Hinde R. A. Biological bases of human social behavior. New York, McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1974. 462 p.
  29. Hunt G. R., Gray R. D. Diversification and cumulative evolution in tool manufacture by New Caledonian crows. Proceedings of the Royal Society. London, 2003, vol. 270, pp. 867–874. doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2302.
  30. Kartsev V. M. Situational Choices among Alternative Visual Stimuli in Honeybees and Paper Wasps when Foraging. In C. Malloy (ed.), Honeybees: Foraging Behavior. Reproductive Biology and Diseases, 2014. pp. 93–118.
  31. Kenward B., Weir A. A. S., Rutz C., Kacelnik A. Tool manufacture by naive juvenile crows. Nature, 2005, vol. 433, pp. 121–122. doi:10.1038/433121a.
  32. Kholodnaya M. A. Psikhologiya intellekta: paradoksy issledovaniya [Psychology of Intelligence: Paradoxes of research]. 2nd ed. Saint Petersburg, Piter, 2002. 272 p.
  33. Krushinskii L. V. Biologicheskie osnovy rassudochnoi deyatel’nosti: Evolyutsionnye i fiziologo-geneticheskie aspekty povedeniya [Biological basis of rational activity: evolutionary, physiological and genetic aspects of behavior]. 2nd ed. Moscow, MGU, 1986. 270 p.
  34. Kullberg C., Lind J. An experimental study of predator recognition in great tit fledglings. Ethology, 2002, vol. 108, pp. 429–441. doi:10.1046/j.1439-0310.2002.00786.x.
  35. Lorenz K. Der kumpanin der umvelt des vogels: die artgenosse als ausloesendesmoment socialer verhaltensweisen. Journal für Ornithologie, 1935, vol. 83, pp. 137–213. doi:10.1007/BF01905355.
  36. Mateo J. M. The nature and representation of individual recognition cues in Belding’s ground squirrels. Animal Behaviour, 2006, vol. 71, pp. 141–154. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.04.006.
  37. Mazokhin-Porshnyakov G. A. Kak otsenit’ intellekt zhivotnykh? [How to estimate intelligence of animals?]. Priroda [Nature], 1989, no. 4, pp. 18–25.
  38. McComb K., Moss C., Durant S. M., Baker L., Sayialel S. Matriarchs as repositories of social knowledge in African elephants. Science, 2001, vol. 292, pp. 491–494. doi:10.1126/science.1057895.
  39. McGrew W. C. The cultured chimpanzee. Reflections on Cultural Primatology. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 2004. 262 p. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511617355.
  40. Mineka S., Cook M. Social learning and the acquisition of snake fear in monkeys. In T. Zentall, B. G. Galef Jr. (eds.), Comparative social learning. New Jersey, Hillsdale, Erlbaum, 1988. pp. 51–73.
  41. Moll H., Tomasello M. Cooperation and human cognition: the Vygotskian intelligence hypothesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2007, vol. 362 no. 1480, pp. 639–648. doi:10.1098/rstb.2006.2000.
  42. Morgan C. L. Animal life and intelligence. London, Edward Arnold, 1891. 519 p. doi:10.1037/12970-000.
  43. Novgorodova T. A. Experimental investigation of information transmission in Formica pratensis (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) using ≪binary tree≫ maze. Entomological Review, 2006, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 287–293. doi:10.1134/S0013873806030043.
  44. Parr L. A, Siebert E., Taubert J. Effect of familiarity and viewpoint on face recognition in chimpanzees. Perception, 2011, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 863–872. doi:10.1068/p6971.
  45. Pinker S. The Language Instinct. How the Mind Creates Language. Harper Perennial Modern Classic, 2007. 483 p.
  46. Rakison D. H. Does women’s greater fear of snakes and spiders originate in infancy?. Evolution and Human Behavior, 2009, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 438–444. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.06.002.
  47. Rakison D. H., Derringer J. Do infants possess an evolved spider-detection mechanism?. Cognition, 2008, vol. 107, pp. 381–393. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.022.
  48. Razumnoe povedenie i yazyk. Vyp. 1. Kommunikativnye sistemy zhivotnykh i yazyk cheloveka. Problema proiskhozhdeniya yazyka [Language and reasoning animal communication and human language: language origins]. ed. A. D. Koshelev, T. V. Chernigovskaya. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskikh kul’tur, 2008. 416 p.
  49. Reznikova Zh. Altruistic Behaviour and Cognitive Specialization in Animal Communities. In N. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning. Springer. Part 1. 2012. pp. 205–208.
  50. Reznikova Zh. Animal Intelligence: From Individual to Social Cognition. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 2007. 488 p.
  51. Reznikova Zh. Government and nepotism in social insects: new dimention provided by an experimental approach. Euroasian Entomological Journal, 2003, vol. 2, pp. 3–14.
  52. Reznikova Zh., Iakovlev I. K. Development of aggression as a possible basis of ≪professional≫ specialization in ants. Doklady Biological Sciences, 2008, vol. 418, pp. 56–58. doi:10.1134/S0012496608010195.
  53. Reznikova Zh., Panteleeva S. An ant’s eye view of culture: propagation of new traditions through triggering dormant behavioural patterns. Acta Ethologica, 2008, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 73–80. doi:10.1007/s10211-008-0044-3.
  54. Reznikova Zh., Panteleeva S. Interaction of the Ant Myrmica rubra L. as a Predator with Springtails (Collembola) as a Mass Prey. Doklady Biological Science, 2001, vol. 380, pp. 475–477. doi:10.1023/A:1012383607521.
  55. Reznikova Zh., Ryabko B. Numerical competence in animals, with an insight from ants. Behaviour, 2011, vol. 148, no. 4, pp. 405–434. doi:10.1163/000579511X568562.
  56. Reznikova Zh. I. Intellekt i yazyk zhivotnykh i cheloveka: Osnovy kognitivnoi etologii [Intelligence and language of animals and humans: Basic foundation of cognitive ethology]. Moscow, Akademiya, 2005.
  57. Reznikova Zh. I., Panteleeva S. N. Vozmozhnye evolyutsionnye mekhanizmy ≪kul’tury≫ u zhivotnykh: gipoteza raspredelennogo sotsial’nogo obucheniya [Possible evolutionary mechanisms of animal “culture”: the hypothesis of distributing social learning]. Zhurnal Obshchei biologii [Biology Bulletin Reviews], 2015. Т. 76. № 4. С. 309–323.
  58. Reznikova Zh. I., Panteleeva S. N., Levenets Ya. V. Analiz povedencheskikh stereotipov na osnove idei kolmogorovskoi slozhnosti: poisk obshchego metodicheskogo podkhoda v etologii i psikhologii [Analysis of behavioral patterns based on the ideas of Kolmogorov complexity: a search for a common methodological approach in ethology and psychology]. Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya [Experimental Psychology], 2014, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 112–125.
  59. Robinson M. H. Insect anti-predator adaptations and behaviour of predatory primates. Congr. Latin Zool, 1970, vol. 2. pp. 811–836.
  60. Ryabko B., Reznikova Zh. Using Shannon Entropy and Kolmogorov Complexity to study the communicative system and cognitive capacities in ants. Complexity, 1996, vol. 2. pp. 37–42. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0526(199611/12)2:2<37::AID-CPLX8>3.0.CO;2-K.
  61. Schaadt C. P., Rymon L. M. Innate fishing behavior of Ospreys. Raptor Research, 1982, vol. 16, pp. 61–62.
  62. Seed A., Seddon E., Greene B., Call J. Chimpanzee ≪folk physics≫: bringing failures into focus. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2012, vol. 367 (1603). pp. 2743–2752. doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0222.
  63. Seligman M. E. P. On the generality of the laws of learning. Psychological Review, 1970, vol. 77, pp. 406–418. doi:10.1037/h0029790.
  64. Shepard R., Metzler J. Mental rotation of three dimensional objects. Science, 1971, vol. 171 no. 972, pp. 701–703. doi:10.1126/science.171.3972.701.
  65. Shettleworth S. J. Cognition, evolution and behavior. N. Y., Oxford University Press, 1998. 688 p.
  66. Smirnova A., Zorina Z., Obozova T., Wasserman E. Crows Spontaneously Exhibit Analogical Reasoning. Current Biology, 2014, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 256–260. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.11.063.
  67. Spalding D. A. Instinct, with original observations on young animals. Macmillan’s Magazine, 1873, vol. 27, pp. 282–293.
  68. Tibbetts E. A., Dale J. Individual recognition: it is good to be different. Trends of Ecology and Evolution, 2007, vol. 22, pp. 529–537. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2007.09.001.
  69. Tinbergen N. The study of instinct. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1951. 228 p.
  70. Tolman E. C. Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological Review, 1948, vol. 55, pp. 189–208. doi:10.1037/h0061626.
  71. Trut L. N., Gerbek Yu. E., Kharlamova A. V., Gulevich R. G., Kukekova A.V. Domestitsiruemye lisitsy: molekulyarno-geneticheskie mekhanizmy, vovlekaemye v otbor po povedeniyu [Domesticated foxes: molecular and genetic mechanisms that are involved in the selection on behavior]. Vavilovskii zhurnal genetiki i selektsii [Russian Journal of Genetics: Applied Research], 2013, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 226–333.
  72. Vokey J. R., Rendall D., Tangen J. M., Parr L. A., de Waal F. B. Visual kin recognition and family resemblance in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 2004, vol. 218, no. 2, pp. 194–199. doi:10.1037/0735-7036.118.2.194.
  73. Vygotsky L. S. Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press. 1978. pp. 79–91.
  74. Watanabe S. Pigeons can discriminate between ≪good≫ and ≪bad≫ paintings by children. Animal Cognition, 2009, vol. 12, pp. 1435–1448.
  75. Watanabe S., Sakamoto J., Wakita M. Pigeon’s discrimination of paintings by Monet and Picasso. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1995, vol. 63, pp. 165–174. doi:10.1901/jeab.1995.63-165.
  76. Watson J. B., Rayner R. Conditioned emotional reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1920, vol. 3, pp. 1–14. doi:10.1037/h0069608.
  77. Whiten A., Goodall J., McGrew W. C., Nishida T., Reynolds V., Sugiyama Y., Tutin C. E. G., Wrangham R. W., Boesch C. Culture in chimpanzees. Nature, 1999, vol. 399, pp. 682–685. doi:10.1038/21415.
  78. Zentall T. R., Wasserman E. A. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Cognition. New York, Oxford University Press, 2012. 960 p.
  79. Zorina Z. A., Smirnova A. A. O chem rasskazali «govoryashchie» obez’yany: Sposobny li vysshie zhivotnye operirovat’ simvolami? [Something to tell talking monkeys: Are higher animals operate with symbols?]. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskikh kul’tur, 2006. 424 p.

© 2007–2021 Portal of Russian Psychological Publications. All rights reserved in Russian

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Catalogue of academic journals in psychology & education MSUPE

Creative Commons License Open Access Repository     Webometrics Ranking of Repositories

RSS Psyjournals at facebook Psyjournals at Twitter Psyjournals at Youtube ??????.???????