Russian Psychological Issues PsyJournals.ru
RUSSIANENGLISH
Вход
OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS
JournalsTopicsAuthorsEditor's Choice For AuthorsAbout PsyJournals.ruContact Us

  Previous issue (2019. Vol. 12, no. 3)

Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)

CrossRef

Experimental Psychology (Russia)

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

ISSN (printed version): 2072-7593

ISSN (online): 2311-7036

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Started in 2008

Published quarterly

Free of fees
Open Access Journal

  

Experimental Psychology (Russia)
2016. Vol. 9, no. 3, 138–154
doi:10.17759/exppsy.2016090311
ISSN: 2072-7593 / 2311-7036 (online)

Translation and adaptation of short five factor personality questionnaire (TIPI-RU): convergent validity, internal consistency and test-retest reliability evaluation 6724

Sergeeva A.S., Assistant professor, Chair of Social Sciences and Humanities, Department of Technological Management and Innovations, ITMO University, an.se.sergeeva@gmail.com
Kirillov B.A., Graduate student, Faculty of Computer Science, Higher School of Economics, k1r1llov@bk.ru
Dzhumagulova A.F., Assistant professor, Chair of Social Sciences and Humanities, Department of Technological Management and Innovations, ITMO University, aledjuna@gmail.com
Abstract
This project involves development and validation of TIPI-RU–Russian adaptation of Ten-Item Personality Inventory by S. Gosling, P. Rentfrow and W. Swann. Main study was made on a sample of 218 (109 male, 109 female) students from one of Saint-Petersburg tech universities (main sample), test-retest study was made on an additional sample of 51 individuals: students and volunteers gathered via snowball method. TIPI-RU is shown to be internally consistent in all its parameters except Openness (which is also true for the original TIPI). Using 5PFQ as a template we have evaluated convergent validity of TIPI-RU and obtained good results for all characteristics. Test-retest validity check has shown decent stability and reproducibility of TIPI-RU results. This work employs novel mathematical approaches to dimensionality reduction and random vector dependence measuring in evaluation of internal consistency, convergent validity and test-retest reliability. The results are significant with p-value lesser than 0.001.

Keywords: big five, questionnaire validation, test-retest reliability, convergent validity, TIPI

Column: Instruments

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2016090311

For Reference

References
  1. Aronson Z. H., Reilly R. R., Lynn G. S. The impact of leader personality on new product development teamwork and performance: The moderating role of uncertainty. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 2006, no. 23, pp. 221–247.
  2. Bernard L. C., Walsh R. P., Mills M. Ask once, may tell: Comparative validity of single and multiple item measurement of the Big-Five personality factors. Counseling and Clinical Psychology Journal, 2005, no. 2, pp. 40– 57.
  3. Canty A., Ripley B. Boot: Bootstrap R (S-Plus) Functions. R package version 1.3-17. 2015.
  4. Chiorri C., Bracco F., Piccinno T., Modafferi C., Battini V. Psychometric properties of a revised version of the Ten Item Personality Inventory. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 2015, no. 31(2), pp. 109–119.
  5. Credé M., Harms P., Niehorster S., Gaye-Valentine A. An evaluation of the consequences of using short measures of the Big Five personality traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2012, no. 102, pp. 874–888.
  6. Davison A. C., Hinkley D. V. Bootstrap Methods and Their Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1997. Pp. 582
  7. Donnellan M.B., Oswald F.L., Baird B.M., Lucas R.E. The mini-IPIP scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality. Psychological Assessment, 2006, no. 18, pp. 192–203.
  8. Egorova M.S., Parshikova O.V. Psikhometricheskie kharakteristiki Korotkogo portretnogo oprosnika Bol’shoi pyaterki (B5-10) [Psychometric characteristics of short portrait Big Five questionnaire (B5-10)]. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya [Psychological studies], 2016, vol. 9, no. 45, pp. 9 (in Russ.).
  9. Egorova M.S., Parshikova O.V. Validation of the Short Portrait Big Five Questionnaire (BF-10). Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya [Psychological studies],  2016,  vol.  9,  no.  45,  p.  9.  http://psystudy.ru (in Russian, abstr. in. English) URL: http://psystudy.ru/index.php/eng/2016v9n45e/1251-egorova45e. html (Accessed 10.04.2016)
  10. Ehrhart M.G., Ehrhart K.H., Roesch S.C., Chung-Herrera B.G., Nadler K., Bradshaw K. Testing the latent factor structure and construct validity of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 2009, no. 47(8), pp. 900–905.
  11. Goldberg L. R. A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. J. Deary, F. De Fruyt, and F. Ostendorf (eds.), Personality psychology in Europe, 1999, no. 7, pp. 7–28.
  12. Goldberg L. R. The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 1992, no. 4, pp. 26–42.
  13. Gosling S.D., Rentfrow P.J., Swann W.B. Jr. A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains.
  14. Journal of Research in Personality, 2003, no. 37, pp. 504–528.
  15. Gunnarsson M., Gustavsson P., Holmberg S., Weibull L. Statistical evaluation of six short Five Factor Model personality measures aiming for potential inclusion in the SOM Institute’s national surveys 2015. URL http://som.gu.se/digitalAssets/1557/1557730_statistical-evaluation-of-six-short-five-factor-model-personality-measures.pdf  (Accessed  10.04.2016)
  16. Herzberg P.Y., Brähler E. Assessing the Big-Five personality domains via short forms. A cautionary note
  17. and a proposal. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 2006, no. 22, pp. 139–148.
  18. Hofmans J., Kuppens P., Allik J. Is short in length short in content? An examination of the domain representation of the Ten Item Personality Inventory scales in Dutch language. Personality and Individual Differences, 2008, no. 45(8), pp. 750–755.
  19. Hooper D., Coughlan J., Mullen M. Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Articles, 2008, pp. 2.
  20. John O. P., Srivastava S. The Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin, O. P. John (eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research, New York: Guilford Press, 1999. Pp. 102–138.
  21. Khromov A.N. Pyatifaktornyi oprosnik lichnosti: ucheb.-metod. posobie [Big Five personality questionnaire: handbook]. Kurgan: Kurganskii gos. universitet, 2000. 23 p. (in Russ.).
  22. Knyazev  G.G.,  Mitrofanova  L.G.,  Bocharov  V.A.  Validizatsiya  russkoyazychnoi  versii  oprosnika
  23. Goldberga «Markery faktorov «Bol’shoi pyaterki» [Validation of Russian version of L.Goldberg’s questionnaire «Markers of Big Five factors»]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal [Psychological Journal], 2010, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 100–110 (in Russ.).
  24. Kornilova T.V., Chumakova M.A. Aprobatsiya kratkogo oprosnika Bol’shoi pyaterki (TIPI, KOBT) [Aprobation of short Big Five questionnaire (TIPI, KOBT)], Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya [Psychological studies], 2016, vol. 9, no. 46, pp. 5 (in Russ.).
  25. Martin T.A., Costa P.T.,, Oryol V.E., Rukavishnikov A.A., Senin I.G. Applications of the Russian NEO- PI-R. In McCrae R.R., Allik J. (eds.), The Five-Factor Model of personality across cultures. Kluwer Academic/ Plenum, 2002. Pp. 226–253.
  26. McCrae R. R., Costa P. T. A contemplated revision of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory. Personality and individual differences, 2004, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 587–596.
  27. Muck P. M., Hell B., Gosling S. D. Construct validation of a short five-factor model instrument: A self-peer study on the German adaptation of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI-G). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 2007, no. 23, pp. 166–175.
  28. Norman W. T. Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1963, vol. 66, no. 6, p. 574.
  29. Oshio A., Abe S., Cutrone P. Development, reliability, and validity of the Japanese version of Ten Item Personality Inventory (TIPI-J). Japanese Journal of Personality, 2012, no. 21, pp. 40–52.
  30. Rammstedt B., John O. P. Kurzversion des Big Five Inventory (BFI-K): Entwicklung und Validierung eines ökonomischen Inventars zur Erfassung der fünf Faktoren der Persönlichkeit. Diagnostica, 2005, no. 51, pp. 195–206.
  31. Rammstedt B., John O. P. Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 2007, no. 7 (41), pp. 203–212.
  32. Renau V. et al. Translation and validation of the Ten-ItemPersonality Inventory into Spanish and Catalan. Aloma: revista de psicologia, ciències de l’educació i de l’esport Blanquerna, 2013, no. 31 (2), pp. 85–97.
  33. Revelle W. psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research. Northwestern University, Evanston. R package version, 2014, vol. 1, no. 1.
  34. Revelle W., Zinbarg R.E.. Coefficients alpha, beta, omega and the GLB: comments on Sijtsma, Psychometrika, 2009, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 145-154. DOI: 10.1007/S11336-008-9102-Z
  35. Robins R. W., Trzesniewski K. H., Tracy J. L., Gosling,S. D., Potter,J. Self-esteem across the lifespan. Psychology and Aging, 2002, no. 17, pp. 423–434.
  36. Romero,E., Villar,P., Gómez-Fraquela,J.A., López-Romero L. Measuring personality traits with ultra- short scales: A study of the Ten Item-Personality Inventory (TIPI) in a Spanish sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 2012, no. 3, pp. 289–293.
  37. Rosseel Y. lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 2012, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 1–36.
  38. Schupp J., Gerlitz J.Y. Big-Five Inventory-SOEP (BFI-S) Zusammenstellung sozialwiessenschaftlicher Item und Skalen 2014. URL http://zis.gesis.org/pdf/Dokumentation/Schupp+%20Big%20Five%20Inventors%20SOEP%20(BFI-S).pdf  (Accessed  10.04.2016)
  39. Shchebetenko S. “The Best Man in the World”: Attitudes Toward Personality Traits. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2014, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 129–148.
  40. Shmelev A.G. Psikhodiagnostika lichnostnykh chert [Psychodiagnosis of personality characteristics]. Saint- Petersburg: Rech’, 2002, 480 p. (in Russ.).
  41. Székely G. J. et al. Measuring and testing dependence by correlation of distances. The Annals of Statistics, 2007, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 2769–2794.
  42. Tsuji H., Fujishima Y., Tsuji H., Natsuno Y., Mukoyama Y., Yamada N. Five-factor model of personality: Concept, structure, and measurement of personality traits [in Japanese], Japanese Psychological Review, 1997, no. 40(2), pp. 239–259.
  43. Woods S. A., Hampson S. E. Measuring the Big Five with single items using a bipolar response scale. European Journal of Personality, 2005, no. 19, pp. 373–390.
comments powered by Disqus
  
About PsyJournals.ru

© 2007–2020 Portal of Russian Psychological Publications. All rights reserved

PsyJournals.ru in Russian

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Catalogue of academic journals in psychology & education MSUPE

Creative Commons License

 RSS Psyjournals at facebook Psyjournals at Twitter Psyjournals at Youtube ??????.???????