A software for assessment of new experience formation and problem solving under achievement or avoidance conditions

736

Abstract

Multiple interdisciplinary studies in cognitive science are based on setups that endorse subjects’ disquisitive activity. We have earlier contrasted approach and avoidance situations in terms of prior experience implementation during formation of new experience, including the learning transfer indices. This was based on current data and accounts of domain organization of memory. To further assess the prior experience employment on consequitive stages of learning we have developed A-Ware — a multifunctional research instrument that allows for assessment of human behavior during problem task handling. The program includes two games that require understanding of task rules. The results presented here show the assessment of learning transfer effect and comparison of performance indices between two feedback modes: either achievement of gain, or avoidance of loss of points. The program allows choosing the task options, creating scenarios and configurations of experiment, and synchronizing events with external recording devices. A-Ware is applicable for explicit learning, attention, spatial memory, categorization, decision making etc. studies within cognitive science and psychophysiology, as well as for diagnostic purposes in clinical, educational and HR practice. The program is available for free upon e-mail request to the first author.

General Information

Keywords: learning, research software, achievement, avoidance, gain and loss, learning transfer

Journal rubric: Research Methods

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2018110105

For citation: Sozinov A.A., Bokhan A.I., Alexandrov Y.I. A software for assessment of new experience formation and problem solving under achievement or avoidance conditions. Eksperimental'naâ psihologiâ = Experimental Psychology (Russia), 2018. Vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 75–91. DOI: 10.17759/exppsy.2018110105. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Alexandrov Yu.I., Gorkin A.G., Sozinov A.A., Svarnik O.E., Kuzina E.A., Gavrilov V.V. Konsolidatsiya i rekonsolidatsiya pamyati: Psikhofiziologicheskii analiz [Consolidation and reconsolidation of memory: A psychophysiological analysis]. Voprosy psikhologii [Issues in Psychology]. 2015. vol. 3, pp. 133—144. (In Russ.).
  2. Alexandrov Yu.I. Nauchenie i pamyat’: traditsionnyi i sistemnyi podkhody [Learning and memory: Traditional and systemic approaches]. Zhurnal vysshei nervnoi deyatel’nosti im. I.P. Pavlova [Pavlov’s Journal of Higher Nervous Activity], 2005, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 842—860. (In Russ.).
  3. Alexandrov Yu.I. Ot emotsii k soznaniyu [From emotions to consciousness]. Psikhologiya tvorchestva: shkola Ya.A. Ponomareva. [Psychology of creativity: Ya.A. Ponomaryov’s school]. Ed. D.V. Ushakov. Moscow, Institut psikhologii RAN, 2006. pp. 293—328. (In Russ.).
  4. Alexandrov Yu.I., Klucharev V., Sams M. Effect of emotional context in auditory-cortex processing. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 2007, vol. 65, pp. 261—271. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2007.05.004
  5. Allen S.W., Brooks L.R. Specializing the operation of an explicit rule. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1991, vol. 120, no. 1, pp. 3—19. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.120.1.3
  6. Bakhchina A.V., Demidovskii A.V., Sozinov A.A. Vegetativnoe obespechenie povedeniya dlya dostizheniya i izbeganiya v usloviyakh stressa [Autonomic subserving of behavior for achievement and avoidance under stress]. Tezisy dokladov 7-oi Mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii po kognitivnoi nauke. [The 7th International Conference on Cognitive Science]. Svetlogorsk, 2016. pp. 138—140. (In Russ.).
  7. Belova S.S., Harlashina G.A. Kognitivnye sposobnosti kak determinanty implicitnogo nauchenija zakonomernostjam vtorogo jazyka [Cognitive abilities as determinants of implicit learning of the second language rules]. Tvorchestvo: nauka, iskusstvo, zhizn’ [Creativity: science, art, life]. Moscow, Institut psihologii RAN, 2015. pp. 45—49. (In Russ.).
  8. Calcott R.D., Berkman E.T. Neural correlates of attentional flexibility during approach and avoidance motivation. PLoS ONE, 2015, vol. 10, no. 5, e0127203. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127203
  9. Carver C.S. Approach, avoidance, and the self-regulation of affect and action. Motivation and Emotion, 2006, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 105—110. doi:10.1007/s11031-006-9044-7
  10. Dudai Y., Karni A., Born J. The consolidation and transformation of memory. Neuron, 2015, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 20—32. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.004
  11. Galatenko V.V., Livshitz E.D., Chernorizov A.M., Zinchenko Y.P., Galatenko A.V., Staroverov V.M., Isaychev S.A., Lebedev V.V., Menshikova G.Ya., Gusev A.N., Lobacheva E.M., Gabidullina R.F., Podol’skii V.E., Sadovnichy V.A. Automated real-time classification of functional states: The significance of individual tuning stage. Psychology in Russia, 2013, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 41—48. doi:10.11621/pir.2013.0304
  12. Gershkovich V.A., Moroshkina N.V., Allahverdov V.M., Ivanchej I.I., Morozov M.I., Karpinskaja V.Ju., Kuvaldina M.B., Volkov D.N. Vozniknovenie povtorjajushhihsja oshibok v processe sensomotornogo nauchenija i sposoby ih korrekcii [Repeating errors during sensory-motor learning and methods of correcting them]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Psihologija i pedagogika [St. Petersburg University Annuals. Series 16. Psychology and Education], 2013, vol. 3, pp. 43—54. (In Russ.).
  13. Gray J.R. Elements of a two-process theory of learning. London, Academic Press, 1975. 423 p.
  14. Ivanchei I.I. Znanie «kak» bez znaniya «pochemu»: Rol’ metakognitivnoi chuvstvitel’nosti v nauchenii iskusstvennoi grammatike [Knowing ‘how’ without knowing ‘what’: The role of metacognitive sensitivity in artificial grammar learning]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Psihologija i pedagogika [St. Petersburg University Annuals. Series 16. Psychology and Education], 2014, vol. 4, pp. 109—123.
  15. Krylov A.K. Modelirovanie dinamiki naucheniya pri formirovanii i reorganizatsii navyka [A model of learning dynamics during formation and re-formation of behavior]. Nelineinaya dinamika v kognitivnykh issledovaniyakh [Nonlinear dynamics in Cognitive Studies]. Nizhnii Novgorod, IPF RAN, 2015. pp. 129—131. (In Russ.).
  16. Lang P.J., Bradley M.M. Appetitive and defensive motivation: Goal-directed or goal-determined? Emotion Review, 2013, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 230—234. doi:10.1177/1754073913477511
  17. McKenzie S, Eichenbaum H. Consolidation and Reconsolidation: Two Lives of Memories? Neuron, 2011, vol. 71, pp. 224—233. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.06.037
  18. Moroshkina N.V. Vliyanie konflikta implitsitnykh i eksplitsitnykh znanii sub”ekta na rezul’taty naucheniya v zadache klassifikatsii [Influence of the conflict of implicit and explicit knowledge of a subject on the results of learning process in classification task]. Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya [Experimental Psychology (Russia)], 2013, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 62—73. (In Russ.).
  19. Moscovitch M., Cabeza R., Winocur G., Nadel L. Episodic memory and beyond: The hippocampus and neocortex in transformation. Annual Review of Psychology, 2016, vol. 67, pp. 105—134. doi:10.1146/ annurev-psych-113011-143733
  20. Neumann R., Strack F. Approach and avoidance: the influence of proprioceptive and exteroceptive cues on encoding of affective information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2000, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 39—48. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.1.39
  21. Reber A.S., Walkenfeld F.F., Hernstadt R. Implicit and explicit learning: Individual differences and IQ. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1991, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 888—896. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.17.5.888
  22. Robinson M.D., Meier B.P., Tamir M., Wilkowski B.M., Ode, S. Behavioral facilitation: a cognitive model of individual differences in approach motivation. Emotion, 2009, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 70—82. doi:10.1037/ a0014519
  23. Robinson M.D., Boyd R.L., Liu T. Understanding personality and predicting outcomes: The utility of cognitive-behavioral probes of approach and avoidance motivation. Emotion Review, 2013, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 303—307. doi:10.1177/1754073913477504
  24. Sozinov A.A., Laukka S.J., Tuominen T., Siipo A., Nopanen M., Alexandrov Yu.I. Transfer of simple task learning is different in approach and withdrawal contexts. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2012, vol. 69, pp. 449—457. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.433
  25. Sozinov A.A., Laukka S., Glavinskaya L.A., Shirinkina A.I., Alexandrov Yu.I. Svyaz’ dinamiki naucheniya i ego motivatsionnogo konteksta u finskikh i rossiiskikh shkol’nikov [Links between learning dynamics and its motivational context in Finnsh and Russian schoolchildren]. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya problem sovremennogo rossiiskogo obshchestva [ Psychological research of modern Russian society issues]. Eds. A.L. Zhuravlev, E.A. Sergienko. Moscow, Institut psikhologii RAN, 2013. pp. 157—177. (In Russ.).
  26. Sozinov A.A., Shirinkina A.I., Siipo A., Nopanen M., Tuominen T., Laukka S., Aleksandrov Yu.I. Formirovanie povedeniya dostizheniya pooshchreniya ili izbeganiya poteri u finskikh i rossiiskikh shkol’nikov [Learning for achievement of gain or avoidance of loss in Finnish and Russian schoolchildren]. Voprosy psikhologii [Issues in Psychology], 2015, vol. 4, pp. 26—37. (In Russ.).
  27. Shvyrkov V.B. Vvedenie v ob”ektivnuyu psikhologiyu: Neironal’nye osnovy psikhiki: Izbrannye trudy [Introduction to objective psychology: Selected publications]. Moscow, Institut psikhologii RAN, 2006. 592 p. (In Russ.).
  28. Zhang Y.Y., Xu L., Rao L.L., Zhou L., Zhou Y., Jiang T., Li S., Liang, Z.Y. Gain-loss asymmetry in neural correlates of temporal discounting: An approach-avoidance motivation perspective. Scientific Reports, 2016, vol. 6, pp. 31902. doi:10.1038/srep31902

Information About the Authors

Alexey A. Sozinov, PhD in Psychology, assistant professor, Research associate, Institute of Psychology, RAS, State Academic University for the Humanities (SAUH), Moscow, Russia, e-mail: alesozinov@yandex.ru

A. I. Bokhan, Social Pedagogue, Ryabinkin’s Educational Institution “School № 1392”, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: saffkaaa@mail.ru

Yuri I. Alexandrov, Doctor of Psychology, Head the Laboratory of the Institute of Psychology RAS and Head. the Department of Psychophysiology State University of Humanitarian Sciences, Institute of Psychology Russian Academy of Science, Head of Laboratory of Neurocognitive Research of Individual Experience, Institute of Experimental Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2644-3016, e-mail: yuraalexandrov@yandex.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 2771
Previous month: 15
Current month: 4

Downloads

Total: 736
Previous month: 2
Current month: 1