|
|
Observer’s Vision of a personality of a Human, who is Depicted on an Artistic Portrait or a Photograph 834
Barabanschikov V.A.
Doctor of Psychology, Corresponding Member of Russian Academy of Education, Director, Institute of Experimental Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5084-0513
e-mail: vladimir.barabanschikov@gmail.com Lupenko E.A.
PhD in Psychology, Senior Researcher, Institute of Experimental Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4026-7581
e-mail: elena-lupenko@yandex.ru Shunto A.S.
PhD Student, Moscow Institute of Psychoanalysis, Moscow, Russia
e-mail: a.shunto@mail.ru
Different observers’ visions of the personality of one and the same human, depicted on an artistic portrait or a photograph, where investigated experimentally. The observers’ estimations obtained by a well known method of “Personality Difference”, were used as the analytic tool. The collected data witness, that different methods of presentation lead to different vision of one and the same personality. A considerable individual variability of significantly different scale estimations’ body and quantity depending on the estimated person was discovered. According to the factor analyses, the persons on photographs are generally perceived as being more active (sociable) then on portraits. The dependence between observers’ self-esteems and their estimations of personages’ individual psychological characteristics regardless to presentation method was also discovered.
Keywords: method of “Personality Difference”, artistic portrait, photo image of a face, perception of individual psychological characteristics of a face
Column: Face science
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2019120301
Funding. The study was supported by Ministry of Education and Science GK 25.3916.2017/4.6.
-
Bazhin Ye.F., Etkind A.M. Lichnostnyy differentsial.
Metodicheskiye rekomendatsii [Personal differential. Guidelines].
Leningrad, 1983. (In Russ.).
-
Barabanshchikov V.A. Vospriyatie vyrazhenij lica [
The perception of facial expressions]. Moskva, IP RAN, 2009. 360 p. (In
Russ.).
-
Barabanshchikov V.A., Besprozvannaya I.I., Anan’yeva K.I.
Otsenka individual’no-psikhologicheskikh svoystv cheloveka v zavisimosti ot
konfiguratsionnykh izmeneniy yego litsa // Rossiyskiy psikhologicheskiy
zhurnal [Russian Psychological Journal]. 2017, vol. 14, no. 4, pp.
49-77. (In Russ.).
-
Barabanshchikov V.A. Demidov A.A. Vospriyatiye
individual’no-psikhologicheskikh osobennostey cheloveka v situatsiyakh
neposredstvennogo i vikarnogo obshcheniya [Perception of individual
psychological characteristics of a person in situations of direct and vicar
communication] // Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta
[Bulletin of Moscow State University]. Ser. 1: Psikhologiya, 2007, no.
3, pp. 107—119. (In Russ.).
-
Barabanshchikov V.A., Lupenko E.A., Shunto A.S.
Vospriyatie lichnosti cheloveka po izobrazheniyam ego lica na fotografii i
hudozhestvennom portrete [Perception of the identity of the person depicted in
the photo and in the portrait of the face]. Eksperimental’naya
psikhologiya [ Experimental Psychology]. 2017, vol. 10, no. 4, pp.
56—73. (In Russ.). doi:10.17759/exppsy.2017100405
-
Kurakova O.A. Sozdanie novoj bazy fotoizobrazhenij
estestvennyh perekhodov mezhdu bazovymi emocional’nymi ekspressiyami litsa [The
creation of a new photobase of natural changs between basic emotional facial
expressions]. In Barabanshchikov V.A., Demidov A.A., Diveev D.A. (eds.) Lico
cheloveka kak sredstvo obshcheniya. Mezhdisciplinarnyj podhod [Human’s
face as a mean of communication]. Moskva, Kogito-Centr, 2012. pp. 287—309.
(In Russ.).
-
Lupenko E.A. Analiz kategorial’noj struktury vospriyatiya
portretov russkih hudozhnikov XIX—XX i portretov hudozhnikov sovetskogo perioda
v svyazi s social’no-rolevym statusom izobrazhennyh na nih lic [Analysis of
categorial structure of perception of the portraits of Russian artists of
XIX—XX centuries and the portraits of the artists of the soviet period in
relation to social status of individuals portraited]. In Barabanshchikov V.A.,
Nosulenko V.N., Samojlenko E.S. (eds). Poznanie v deyatel’nosti i
obshchenii: ot teorii i praktiki k ehksperimentu [Cognition in action
and communication]. Moskva, IPRAN, 2011, pp. 297—304. (In Russ.).
-
Lupenko E.A. Portretnoe izobrazhenie cheloveka kak predmet
psihologicheskogo issledovaniya: problemy i issledovatel’skie podhody [Portrait
of a person as an object of a psychological study]. In Anan’eva K.I.,
Barabanshchikov V.A., Demidov A.A. (eds). Lico cheloveka v nauke, iskusstve
i praktike [Human’s face in science, art and practice]. Moskva,
Kogito-Centr, 2014, pp. 269—283. (In Russ.).
-
Lupenko E.A. Predstavlenie o lichnosti cheloveka po
portretnomu izobrazheniyu [Personality perception via a portrait] In
Barabanshchikov V.A. (ed). Kognitivnye mekhanizmy neverbal’noj
kommunikacii [Cognitive mechanisms of nonverbal communication].
Moskva, Kogito-Centr, 2017. pp. 265—303. (In Russ.).
-
Maslova M.D. Lico cheloveka i ego otsutstvie v tvorchestve
Rene Magritta [Human’s face and its absence in the art of Rene Magritt]. In
Anan’eva K.I., Barabanshchikov V.A., Demidov A.A. (eds). Lico cheloveka v
nauke, iskusstve i praktike [Human’s face in science, art and
practice]. Moskva, Kogito-Centr, 2014, pp. 285—292. (In Russ.).
-
Nikitina E.A. Napravlenie lic na portretah [Face’s
directions on a portrait]. In Anan’eva K.I., Barabanshchikov V.A., Demidov A.A.
(eds.) Lico cheloveka v prostranstve obshcheniya [Human’s face in
communication dimension]. Moskva, Kogito-Centr, 2016. pp. 157—171. (In
Russ.).
-
Bruce V. Young A. In the eye of beholder. The science
of face perception. N.Y., Oxford University Press, 2000.
-
Ekman P., Friesen W. Facial action coding system.
Palo Alto, Consulting Psychologists Press, 1978.
-
Todorov A., Oosterhof N.N. Evaluating face
trustworthiness. Modeling Social Perception of Faces. IEEE Signal Processing
Magazine, 2011, vol. 28, no 3, pp. 117—122.
|
|
