Russian Psychological Issues PsyJournals.ru
OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS
JournalsTopicsAuthorsEditor's Choice For AuthorsAbout PsyJournals.ruContact Us

  Previous issue (2020. Vol. 13, no. 1)

Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)

CrossRef

Experimental Psychology (Russia)

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

ISSN (printed version): 2072-7593

ISSN (online): 2311-7036

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Started in 2008

Published quarterly

Free of fees
Open Access Journal

 

Incubation Research: Potential of Within Subject and Between Subject Experimental Design 42

Lapteva E.M.
PhD in Psychology, Researcher, Laboratory for Psychology and Psychophysiology of Creativity, Institute of Psychology of RAS, Moscow, Russia
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3051-6492
e-mail: ek.lapteva@gmail.com

Valueva E.A.
PhD in Psychology, Research Fellow, The Laboratory of the Psychology and Psychophysiology of Creativity, Institute of Psychology of RAS, Moscow, Russia
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3637-287X
e-mail: ekval@mail.ru

Zaidelman L.Ya.
Researcher, Kurchatov Institute, Moscow, Russia
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2941-144X
e-mail: zaydelman_ly@nrcki.ru

Zinina A.A.
PhD in Psychology, Researcher, Kurchatov Institute, Moscow, Russia
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9575-1875
e-mail: zinina_aa@nrcki.ru

Abstract
In the current work we aimed to detect the incubation effect using between-subject and within-subject design. We compared the performance rate of solving Remote Association Test in incubation (with a break) and no-incubation conditions. During the incubation phase participants were listening to the audio record of the science-fiction novel. No significant differences were found in the performance level in incubation and no-incubation conditions, neither in within-group nor in the between-group tests. Nonetheless we found the indirect indicators of the processes that are encountered during the incubation period. The discrepancy in the absence of raw performance indicators of incubation on the one hand, and the presence of the difficulty indicators changes on another hand, is discussed in the context of the activation paradigm and the model of awareness of implicit solution.

Keywords: incubation, remote associations test, between-subject design, within-subject design

Column: Psychology of Thinking

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2020130203

For Reference

Funding

The study was supported by the RFBR, projects № 18-00-00569 мк and №. 17-06-00574.

References
  1. Allakhverdov V.M. Opyt teoreticheskoi psikhologii [The Experience of Theoretical Psychology]. Saint- Petersburg, «Pechatnyi dvor» Publ., 1993. (In Russ.).
  2. Allakhverdov V.M. Kak soznanie vybiraet odno znachenie iz mnogikh vozmozhnykh [How does the conscience choose the one meaning among many possible ones]. Peterburgskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal [Peterburg journal of Psychology]. 2015. № 13. PP. 1—13. (In Russ.).
  3. Allakhverdov V.M. Neizbezhnyi put’ tvorchestva: ot inkubatsii k insaitu [Inevitable pass of the creativity: from the incubation to the insight]. In Tvorchestvo: ot biologicheskikh osnovanii k sotsial’nym i kul’turnym fenomenam [Creativity: from biological grounds to social and cultural phenomena] Ed. D.V. Ushakov. Moscow, «Institut psikhologii RAN» Publ., 2011. pp. 175—187. (In Russ.).
  4. Valueva E.A. Rol’ inkubatsionnogo perioda v reshenii zadach [The Role of Incubation Period in Problem Solving]. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki [Psychology. HSE journal]. 2016. T. 13, № 4. pp. 789—800. (In Russ.).
  5. Valueva E.A., Belova S.S. Diagnostika tvorcheskikh sposobnostei: metody, problemy, perspektivy [Assessment of the creative abilities: methods, problems, perspectives]. In Tvorchestvo: ot biologicheskikh predposylok k kul’turnym fenomenam fenomenam [Creativity: from biological grounds to social and cultural phenomena] Ed. D.V. Ushakov. Moscow, «Institut psikhologii RAN» Publ., 2011. pp. 625—647. (In Russ.).
  6. Valueva E.A., Lapteva E.M. Ispol’zovanie podskazok pri reshenii zadach: modal’naya spetsifichnost’ ili universal’naya sposobnost’? [Using a Cue in Problem Solving: Modal Specificity or Universal Ability?] Rossiiskii zhurnal kognitivnoi nauki [The Russian Journal of Cognitive Science]. 2015. T. 2, № 2—3. pp. 53—65. (In Russ.).
  7. Valueva E.A., Ushakov D.V. Insait i inkubatsiya v myshlenii: rol’ protsessov osoznavaniya [Insight and incubation in thinking: the role of awareness processes]. Sibirskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal [Siberian journal of psychology]. 2017. № 63. pp. 19—35. doi 10.17223/17267080/63/2 (In Russ.).
  8. Velichkovskii B.M., Knyazev G.G., Valueva E.A., Ushakov D.V. Novye podkhody v issledovaniyakh tvorcheskogo myshleniya: ot fenomenologii insaita k ob”ektivnym metodam i neirosetevym modelyam [New approaches in studies of creative thinking: From phenomenology of insight to objective methods and neuronetwork models]. Voprosy psikhologii [The Issues Relevant to Psychology]. 2019. № 3. pp. 3—16. (In Russ.).
  9. Puankare A. Matematicheskoe tvorchestvo [Mathematical creativity]. In Psikhologiya myshleniya [Psychology of thinking]. Eds. Yu.B. Gippenreiter, V.V. Petukhov. Moscow, MGU Publ., 1981. pp. 356—365. (In Russ.).
  10. Brysbaert M. How many participants do we have to include in properly powered experiments? A tutorial of power analysis with reference tables. Journal of Cognition. 2019. Vol. 2, № 1. P. 1—38. doi 10.5334/joc.72
  11. Choi H., Smith S.M. Incubation and the resolution of tip-of-the-tongue states. Journal of General Psychology. 2005. Vol. 132, № 4. P. 365—376. doi 10.3200/GENP.132.4.365-376
  12. Cohen J. A power primer. Psychological Bulletin. 1992. Vol. 112, № 1. P. 155—159.
  13. Dijksterhuis A., Meurs T. Where creativity resides: the generative power of unconscious thought. Consciousness and Cognition. 2006. Vol. 15, № 1. P. 135—146. doi 10.1016/j.concog.2005.04.007
  14. Gallate J., Wong C., Ellwood S., Roring R.W., Snyder A. Creative people use nonconscious processes to their advantage. Creativity Research Journal. 2012. Vol. 24, № 2—3. P. 146—151. doi 10.1080/10400419.2012.677282
  15. Gilhooly K.J., Georgiou G.J., Garrison J., Reston J.D., Sirota M. Don’t wait to incubate: Immediate versus delayed incubation in divergent thinking. Memory & Cognition. 2012. Vol. 40. P. 966—975. doi 10.3758/s13421-012-0199-z
  16. Kohn N., Smith S.M. Partly versus completely out of your mind: Effects of incubation and distraction on resolving fixation. The Journal of Creative Behavior. 2009. Vol. 43, № 2. P. 102—118. doi 10.1002/j.2162- 6057.2009.tb01309.x
  17. Penaloza A., Calvillo D.P. Incubation provides relief from artificial fixation in problem solving. Creativity Research Journal. 2012. Vol. 24, № 4. P. 338—344. doi 10.1080/10400419.2012.730329
  18. Sio U.N., Kotovsky K., Cagan J. Interrupted: The roles of distributed effort and incubation in preventing fixation and generating problem solutions. Memory & Cognition, 2017. Vol. 45, № 4. P. 553—565. doi: 10.3758/s13421-016-0684-x
  19. Sio U.N., Ormerod T.C. Does incubation enhance problem solving? A meta-analytic review. Psychological bulletin. 2009a. Vol. 135, № 1. P. 94—120. doi 10.1037/a0014212
  20. Sio U.N., Ormerod T.C. Mechanisms underlying incubation in problem-solving: Evidence for unconscious cue assimilation. Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society / N.A. Taatgen & H. van Rijn (Eds.). Amsterdam: Cognitive Science Society, 2009b. P. 401—406.
  21. Smith S.M., Blankenship S.E. Incubation and the persistence of fixation in problem solving. American Journal of Psychology. 1991. Vol. 104, № 1. P. 61—87. doi 10.2307/1422851
  22. Vul E., Pashler H. Incubation benefits only after people have been misdirected. Memory & Cognition. 2007. Vol. 35, № 4. P. 701—710. doi 10.3758/BF03193308
  23. Wallas G. The art of thought. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1926.
  24. Wiley J. Expertise as mental set: The effects of domain knowledge in creative problem solving. Memory & Cognition. 1998. Vol. 26, № 4. P. 716—730. doi 10.3758/BF03211392
  25. Zhong C.-B., Dijksterhuis A., Galinsky A.D. The merits of unconscious thought in creativity. Psychological science. 2008. Vol. 19, № 9. P. 912—918. doi 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02176.x
 
About PsyJournals.ru

© 2007–2020 Portal of Russian Psychological Publications. All rights reserved

PsyJournals.ru in Russian

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Catalogue of academic journals in psychology & education MSUPE

Creative Commons License Open Access Repository

RSS Psyjournals at facebook Psyjournals at Twitter Psyjournals at Youtube ??????.???????