Previous issue (2020. Vol. 13, no. 2)
Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)
|
|
Incubation Research: Potential of Within Subject and Between Subject Experimental Design 64
Lapteva E.M.
PhD in Psychology, Researcher, Laboratory for Psychology and Psychophysiology of Creativity, Institute of Psychology of RAS, Moscow, Russia
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3051-6492
e-mail: ek.lapteva@gmail.com Valueva E.A.
PhD in Psychology, Research Fellow, The Laboratory of the Psychology and Psychophysiology of Creativity, Institute of Psychology of RAS, Moscow, Russia
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3637-287X
e-mail: ekval@mail.ru Zaidelman L.Ya.
Researcher, Kurchatov Institute, Moscow, Russia
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2941-144X
e-mail: zaydelman_ly@nrcki.ru Zinina A.A.
PhD in Psychology, Researcher, Kurchatov Institute, Moscow, Russia
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9575-1875
e-mail: zinina_aa@nrcki.ru
In the current work we aimed to detect the incubation effect using between-subject and within-subject design. We compared the performance rate of solving Remote Association Test in incubation (with a break) and no-incubation conditions. During the incubation phase participants were listening to the audio record of the science-fiction novel. No significant differences were found in the performance level in incubation and no-incubation conditions, neither in within-group nor in the between-group tests. Nonetheless we found the indirect indicators of the processes that are encountered during the incubation period. The discrepancy in the absence of raw performance indicators of incubation on the one hand, and the presence of the difficulty indicators changes on another hand, is discussed in the context of the activation paradigm and the model of awareness of implicit solution.
The study was supported by the RFBR, projects № 18-00-00569 мк and №. 17-06-00574.
-
Allakhverdov V.M. Opyt teoreticheskoi psikhologii [The
Experience of Theoretical Psychology]. Saint- Petersburg, «Pechatnyi dvor»
Publ., 1993. (In Russ.).
-
Allakhverdov V.M. Kak soznanie vybiraet odno znachenie iz
mnogikh vozmozhnykh [How does the conscience choose the one meaning among many
possible ones]. Peterburgskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal [Peterburg journal
of Psychology]. 2015. № 13. PP. 1—13. (In Russ.).
-
Allakhverdov V.M. Neizbezhnyi put’ tvorchestva: ot
inkubatsii k insaitu [Inevitable pass of the creativity: from the incubation to
the insight]. In Tvorchestvo: ot biologicheskikh osnovanii k sotsial’nym i
kul’turnym fenomenam [Creativity: from biological grounds to social and
cultural phenomena] Ed. D.V. Ushakov. Moscow, «Institut psikhologii RAN»
Publ., 2011. pp. 175—187. (In Russ.).
-
Valueva E.A. Rol’ inkubatsionnogo perioda v reshenii
zadach [The Role of Incubation Period in Problem Solving]. Psikhologiya.
Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki [Psychology. HSE journal]. 2016. T. 13, №
4. pp. 789—800. (In Russ.).
-
Valueva E.A., Belova S.S. Diagnostika tvorcheskikh
sposobnostei: metody, problemy, perspektivy [Assessment of the creative
abilities: methods, problems, perspectives]. In Tvorchestvo: ot
biologicheskikh predposylok k kul’turnym fenomenam fenomenam [Creativity: from
biological grounds to social and cultural phenomena] Ed. D.V. Ushakov.
Moscow, «Institut psikhologii RAN» Publ., 2011. pp. 625—647. (In Russ.).
-
Valueva E.A., Lapteva E.M. Ispol’zovanie podskazok pri
reshenii zadach: modal’naya spetsifichnost’ ili universal’naya sposobnost’?
[Using a Cue in Problem Solving: Modal Specificity or Universal Ability?]
Rossiiskii zhurnal kognitivnoi nauki [The Russian Journal of Cognitive
Science]. 2015. T. 2, № 2—3. pp. 53—65. (In Russ.).
-
Valueva E.A., Ushakov D.V. Insait i inkubatsiya v
myshlenii: rol’ protsessov osoznavaniya [Insight and incubation in thinking:
the role of awareness processes]. Sibirskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal
[Siberian journal of psychology]. 2017. № 63. pp. 19—35. doi
10.17223/17267080/63/2 (In Russ.).
-
Velichkovskii B.M., Knyazev G.G., Valueva E.A., Ushakov
D.V. Novye podkhody v issledovaniyakh tvorcheskogo myshleniya: ot fenomenologii
insaita k ob”ektivnym metodam i neirosetevym modelyam [New approaches in
studies of creative thinking: From phenomenology of insight to objective
methods and neuronetwork models]. Voprosy psikhologii [The Issues Relevant
to Psychology]. 2019. № 3. pp. 3—16. (In Russ.).
-
Puankare A. Matematicheskoe tvorchestvo [Mathematical
creativity]. In Psikhologiya myshleniya [Psychology of thinking]. Eds.
Yu.B. Gippenreiter, V.V. Petukhov. Moscow, MGU Publ., 1981. pp. 356—365. (In
Russ.).
-
Brysbaert M. How many participants do we have to include
in properly powered experiments? A tutorial of power analysis with reference
tables. Journal of Cognition. 2019. Vol. 2, № 1. P. 1—38. doi
10.5334/joc.72
-
Choi H., Smith S.M. Incubation and the resolution of
tip-of-the-tongue states. Journal of General Psychology. 2005. Vol. 132,
№ 4. P. 365—376. doi 10.3200/GENP.132.4.365-376
-
Cohen J. A power primer. Psychological Bulletin.
1992. Vol. 112, № 1. P. 155—159.
-
Dijksterhuis A., Meurs T. Where creativity resides: the
generative power of unconscious thought. Consciousness and Cognition.
2006. Vol. 15, № 1. P. 135—146. doi 10.1016/j.concog.2005.04.007
-
Gallate J., Wong C., Ellwood S., Roring R.W., Snyder A.
Creative people use nonconscious processes to their advantage. Creativity
Research Journal. 2012. Vol. 24, № 2—3. P. 146—151. doi
10.1080/10400419.2012.677282
-
Gilhooly K.J., Georgiou G.J., Garrison J., Reston J.D.,
Sirota M. Don’t wait to incubate: Immediate versus delayed incubation in
divergent thinking. Memory & Cognition. 2012. Vol. 40. P. 966—975.
doi 10.3758/s13421-012-0199-z
-
Kohn N., Smith S.M. Partly versus completely out of your
mind: Effects of incubation and distraction on resolving fixation. The
Journal of Creative Behavior. 2009. Vol. 43, № 2. P. 102—118. doi
10.1002/j.2162- 6057.2009.tb01309.x
-
Penaloza A., Calvillo D.P. Incubation provides relief from
artificial fixation in problem solving. Creativity Research Journal.
2012. Vol. 24, № 4. P. 338—344. doi 10.1080/10400419.2012.730329
-
Sio U.N., Kotovsky K., Cagan J. Interrupted: The roles of
distributed effort and incubation in preventing fixation and generating problem
solutions. Memory & Cognition, 2017. Vol. 45, № 4. P. 553—565. doi:
10.3758/s13421-016-0684-x
-
Sio U.N., Ormerod T.C. Does incubation enhance problem
solving? A meta-analytic review. Psychological bulletin. 2009a. Vol.
135, № 1. P. 94—120. doi 10.1037/a0014212
-
Sio U.N., Ormerod T.C. Mechanisms underlying incubation in
problem-solving: Evidence for unconscious cue assimilation. Proceedings of
the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society / N.A. Taatgen
& H. van Rijn (Eds.). Amsterdam: Cognitive Science Society, 2009b. P.
401—406.
-
Smith S.M., Blankenship S.E. Incubation and the
persistence of fixation in problem solving. American Journal of
Psychology. 1991. Vol. 104, № 1. P. 61—87. doi 10.2307/1422851
-
Vul E., Pashler H. Incubation benefits only after people
have been misdirected. Memory & Cognition. 2007. Vol. 35, № 4. P.
701—710. doi 10.3758/BF03193308
-
Wallas G. The art of thought. New York: Harcourt
Brace Jovanovich, 1926.
-
Wiley J. Expertise as mental set: The effects of domain
knowledge in creative problem solving. Memory & Cognition. 1998.
Vol. 26, № 4. P. 716—730. doi 10.3758/BF03211392
-
Zhong C.-B., Dijksterhuis A., Galinsky A.D. The merits of
unconscious thought in creativity. Psychological science. 2008. Vol. 19,
№ 9. P. 912—918. doi 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02176.x
|
|
