Previous issue (2020. Vol. 13, no. 1)
Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)
|
|
Gender Differences in the State of Volitional Regulation among Various Ethnic Groups of the Russian Federation and the CIS 91
The hypothesis about the relationship between masculinity of national culture and the severity of gender differences in the state of volitional regulation among its representatives is tested. Men and women were compared among representatives of masculine (Kabardin, Ossetian, Armenians, Tatars, Bashkirs, Tajiks) and feminine (Russians, Ukrainians, Belarusians, Komi, Mari, Koreans, Tuvans, Jews) ethnic groups. In total, 1453 people aged 18 to 30 years participated in the study. To diagnose the state of volitional regulation of the respondents, the following methods were used: “Action-control scale” by Yu. Kuhl, “Questionnaire for revealing the expression of self-control in the emotional sphere, activity and behavior”, self-appraisals of volitional qualities. It is shown that in masculine cultures, men and women significantly differ in terms of the “Action-control scale”, the severity of emotional, behavioral and social self-control, as well as self-assessments of volitional qualities, while in feminine cultures there are practically no differences. Men demonstrate qualities associated with the implementation of intentions in action, and women demonstrate qualities associated with the organization of their activities in accordance with the requirements of society.
Keywords: volition, will, volitional regulation, self-control, self-regulation, volitional qualities, cross-cultural approach, ethnos, gender, masculinity, femininity
Column: Cross-Cultural Psychology
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2020130210
The reported study was funded by Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR), project number 18-013-01108.
-
Bykov A.V., Shul’ga T.I. Stanovlenie volevoj reguljacii v
ontogeneze [The Genesis of Volitional Regulation in Ontogenesis]. Moscow: Publ.
URAO, 1999. 168 p. (In Russ.).
-
Ivannikov V.A., Barabanov D.D., Monroz A.V., Shlyapnikov
V.N. Eidman E.V. Mesto ponyatiya «volya» v sovremennoi psikhologii [The role of
the notion of will in contemporary psychology]. Voprosy psikhologii [Voprosy
Psychologii], 2014, no. 2, pp. 15—23. (In Russ., Abstr. in Engl.).
-
Ivannikov V.A., Shlyapnikov V.N. Osobennosti volevoj
regulyacii u predstavitelej razny`x e`tnokul`turny`x grupp [Features of
volitional regulation among representatives of different ethnocultural groups].
Eksperimental’naâ psihologiâ [Experimental
Psychology (Russia)], 2019. Vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 70—84.
doi:10.17759/exppsy.2019120106. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.).
-
Ivannikov V.A., Eidman E.V. Struktura volevykh kachestv po
dannym samootsenki [Structure of volitional qualities according to
self-assessment data]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal [Psikhologicheskii
Zhurnal], 1990. Vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 39—49. ontogeneze [The Genesis of
Volitional Regulation in Ontogenesis]. Moscow: Publ. URAO, 1999. 168 p. (In
Russ.).
-
Il’in E.P. Psikhologiya voli [The Psychology of Volition].
Saint-Peterburg: Publ. Piter, 2000. 288 p. ontogeneze [The Genesis of
Volitional Regulation in Ontogenesis]. Moscow: Publ. URAO, 1999. 168 p. (In
Russ.).
-
Krys’ko V.G. Etnicheskaya psikhologiya [Ethnic
Psychology]. Moscow: Publ. Akademiya, 2008. 320 p. ontogeneze [The Genesis of
Volitional Regulation in Ontogenesis]. Moscow: Publ. URAO, 1999. 168 p. (In
Russ.).
-
Sokolova D.A. Social’no-psihologicheskie harakteristiki
obshhnosti tnicheskih korejcev Primorskogo kraja [Socio-psychological
characteristics of a community of ethnic Koreans in Primorsky Krai].
Social’nye issledovanija [Social Studies], 2016, no. 3. pp. 24—37.
ontogeneze [The Genesis of Volitional Regulation in Ontogenesis]. Moscow: Publ.
URAO, 1999. 168 p. (In Russ.).
-
Soldatova G.U. Psihologija mezhjetnicheskoj
naprjazhennosti [Psychology of Inter-Ethnic Tension]. Moscow: Publ. Smysl,
1998. 398 p. ontogeneze [The Genesis of Volitional Regulation in Ontogenesis].
Moscow: Publ. URAO, 1999. 168 p. (In Russ.).
-
Shapkin S.A. Eksperimental’noe izuchenie volevykh
protsessov [Experimental study of volitional processes]. Moscow: Publ. Smysl,
1997. 140 p. ontogeneze [The Genesis of Volitional Regulation in Ontogenesis].
Moscow: Publ. URAO, 1999. 168 p. (In Russ.).
-
Shlyapnikov V.N. Vzaimosvyaz` pokazatelej sostoyaniya
volevoj regulyacii i e`tnicheskoj identichnosti [Relationship between
Volitional Regulation and Ethnic Identity]. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya
psikhologiya [Cultural-Historical Psychology], 2019. Vol. 15, no. 3, pp.
83—90. doi:10.17759/chp.2019150309. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.).
-
Shlyapnikov V.N. Gendernye osobennosti volevoj regulyacii
[Gender differences in volitional regulation] // Vestnik MGOU. Seriya
«Psihologicheskie nauki». [Bulletin of the Moscow Region State University.
Series: Psychology] 2011. no. 1. pp. 26—38. ontogeneze [The Genesis of
Volitional Regulation in Ontogenesis]. Moscow: Publ. URAO, 1999. 168 p. (In
Russ.).
-
Shlyapnikov V.N. Osobennosti volevoi regulyatsii u
kabardintsev, komi, tuvintsev i russkikh [Features of Volitional Regulation of
Kabardians, Komi, Tuvinians and Russians]. Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya
[Experimental Psychology (Russia)], 2018. Vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 107—115.
doi:10.17759/exppsy.2018110409. (In Russ., Abstr. in Engl.).
-
Baumann N., Kazén M., Quirin M., Koole S.L. Why People Do
the Things They Do: Building on Julius Kuhl’s Contributions to the Psychology
of Motivation and Volition. Göttingen: Hogrefe Publ., 2018. 433 p.
-
Baumeister R.F., Vohs K.D. Strength Model of
Self-Regulation as Limited Resource: Assessment, Controversies, Update.
Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2016. Vol. 54, pp.
67—127.
-
Chatterjee M.B., Baumann N., Osborne D., Mahmud S.H.,
Koole S.L. (2018) Cross-Cultural Analysis of Volition: Action Orientation Is
Associated With Less Anxious Motive Enactment and Greater Well-Being in
Germany, New Zealand, and Bangladesh. Front. Psychol. 9:1043. doi:
10.3389/ fpsyg.2018.01043
-
Diefendorff J.M., Hall R.J., Lord R.G., Strean M.L.
Action-state orientation: Construct validity of a revised measure and its re-
lationship to work-related variables // J. Appl. Psychol. 2000.
Apr. V. 85(2). P. 250—263.
-
Hofstede G. Culture’s Consequences: comparing values,
behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand
Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2001. 616 p.
-
Kuhl J., Keller H. Affect-Regulation, Self-development and
Parenting: A Functional-Design Approach to Cross-Cultural Differences /
Handbook of Motivation and Cognition Across Cultures. Academic Press,
2008. Vol. 1. P. 19—47. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-373694-9.X0001-3
-
Mischel W., Ayduk O., Berman M.G., Casey B.J., Gotlib
I.H., Jonides J., Kross E., Teslovich T., Wilson N.L., Zayas V., Shoda Y.
Willpower over the life span: decomposing self-regulation. Social Cognitive
and Affective Neuroscience, 2011. Vol. 6(2), pp. 252—256.
|
|
