|
|
The Effect of the Alert Signal in Changing the Operability and Productivity of the Activity 98
The article is devoted to the investigation of the consequences of “warning signals” on performance results. The role of the time for signaling the beginning of activity in the formation of the initial readiness and the transition from the phase of the state of rest to the working state is analyzed, namely, the issue of changing the productivity of the activity when manipulating the “warning effect” is studied. Based on the results of the survey, 108 people in 5 experimental groups with manipulation of the signaling timing of the beginning of the solution of motor and sensory tasks can conclude that the localization of signals at different intervals of preparation for activity determines changes the efficiency of the transition from phase of operational rest to the phase of the working state. Intermediate warning signal at different stages of activity, heterochronically affects the performance and its stability. This trend is reflected in the accelerating and retarding effect of the alert signal.
-
Asmolov A.G. Ustanovochnye jeffekty kak predvidenie
budushhego: istoriko-jevoljucionnyj analiz [Setting effects as foreseeing the
future: historical-evolutionary analysis] // Rossijskij zhurnal kognitivnoj
nauki [Russian Journal of Cognitive Science], 2017. Vol. 4, no. 1,
pp. 26—32. (In Russ.).
-
Chuprikova N.I. Slovo kak faktor upravleniya v vysshey
nervnoy deyatel’nosti [Word as a control factor in higher nervous activity].
M.: Prosveshcheniye, 1967. 327 p. (In Russ.).
-
Adams R.J., Lambos W.A. Developmental changes in response
preparation to visual stimuli. Percept. Mot. Skills, 1986. Vol. 62, pp.
519—522. DOI: 10.2466/pms.1986.62.2.519
-
Bausenhart K.M., Rolke B., Hackley S.A., Ulrich R. The
locus of temporal preparation effects: Evidence from the psychological
refractory period paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2006.
Vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 536—42.
-
Correa A., Lupianez J., Madrid E., Tudela P. Temporal
attention enhances early visual processing: A review and new evidence from
event-related potentials. Brain Research, 2006. Vol. 1076, pp.
116—128.
-
Cristescu T.C., Devlin J.T., Nobre A.C. Orienting
attention to semantic categories. Neuroimage, 2006. Vol. 33, no. 4, pp.
1178—87.
-
Dalmaijer E.S., Nijenhuis B.G., Van der Stigchel S. Life
is unfair, and so are racing sports: some athletes can randomly benefit from
alerting effects due to inconsistent starting procedures. Front
Psychol., 2015. Vol. 6, pp.1—4.
-
De Koning J.J. World records: how much athlete? how much
technology. Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform, 2010. Vol. 5, pp.
262—267.
-
Duncan J. Selective Attention and the Organization of
Visual Information. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 1984.
Vol. 123, pp. 501—517.
-
Egeth H.E., Yantis S. Visual Attention: Control,
Representation and Time Course. Annual Review of Psychology, 1997. Vol.
18, pp. 269—297.
-
Eikenberry A., McAuliffe J., Welsh T.N., Zerpa C.,
McPherson M., Newhouse I. Starting with the «right» foot minimizes sprint start
time. Acta Psychol., 2008. Vol. 127, pp. 495—500.
-
Fortier S., Basset F.A., Mbourou G.A., Faverial J.,
Teasdale N. Starting block performance in sprinters: a statistical method for
identifying discriminative parameters of the performance and an analysis of the
effect of providing feedback over a 6-week period. J. Sports Sci. Med.,
2005. Vol. 4, pp. 134—143.
-
Hackley S.A., Schankin A., Wohlschlaeger A., Wascher E.
Localization of temporal preparation effects via trisected reaction time.
Psychophysiology, 2007. Vol. 44, pp. 334—338.
-
Haugen T.A., Shalfawi S., Tonnessen E. The effect of
different starting procedures on sprinters’ reaction time. J. Sports
Sci., 2013. Vol. 31, pp. 699—705.
-
Klein R., Kerr B. Visual signal detection and the locus of
foreperiod effects. Mem. Cogn., 1974. Vol. 2, pp. 431—435.
-
Lawrence M.A., Klein R.M. Isolating exogenous and
endogenous modes of temporal attention. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen., 2013.
Vol. 142, pp. 560—572.
-
Le Ny I.F. Le temps de reaction mortice simple consideree
comme un indica-teur psychologiqu. La Raison, 1956. V. 2, pp.
47—74.
-
Müller-Gethmann H., Ulrich R., Rinkenauer G. Locus of the
effect of temporal preparation: Evidence from the lateralized readiness
potential. Psychophysiology, 2003. Vol. 40, pp. 597—611.
DOI:10.1111/1469- 8986.00061
-
Niemi P., Natanen R. Foreperiod and simple reaction time.
Psychol. Bull., 1981. Vol. 89, pp. 133—162.
-
Nobre A.C., Correa A., Coull J.T. The hazards of time.
Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 2007. Vol. 17, pp. 465—470.
-
Posner M.I. Orienting of Attention. Quarterly Journal
of Experimental Psychology, 1980. Vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 3—25.
-
Posner M.I., Boies S.J. Components of attention.
Psychol. Rev., 1971. Vol. 78, pp. 391—408.
-
Sanders A.F. The fore period effect revisited. Q. J.
Exp. Psychol., 1975. Vol. 27, pp. 591—598.
-
Thomaschke R., Wagener A., Kiesel A., Hoffmann J. The
scope and precision of specific temporal expectancy: evidence from a variable
foreperiod paradigm. Attent. Percept. Psychophys., 2011. Vol. 73, pp.
953—964.
-
Weinbach N., Henik A. The interaction between alerting and
executive control: dissociating phasic arousal and temporal expectancy.
Attent. Percept. Psychophys., 2013. Vol. 75, pp. 1374—1381.
|
|