|
|
Acquisition of Abstract Knowledge in Implicit Learning of Anagram Solution Scheme 22
The article addresses the problem of unconscious gaining of abstract knowledge. Participants solved circular 5-letter anagram arranged by the same invariant scheme. The learned schematic invariant is not perceptive, contrary to the usual invariant acquisition technique in other studies. The possibility of implicit learning of a solution scheme is discussed. Efficiency of anagram solving is compared between the groups with constant or changed solution scheme during the test stage. The change of the solution scheme leads to a decrease of efficiency, i.e. to the lower number of the solved anagrams. The results support the possibility of gaining unconscious abstract knowledge concerning the scheme without any perceptual invariant component. Possible use of a similar stimulus material in studies of interaction between visual and verbal components of working memory is briefly discussed.
- Deeva T.M., Agafonov A.Yu., Kryukova A.P., Shilov Yu.E. Vlijanie
implicitnogo usvoenija invariantov na jeffektivnost’ reshenija zadachi
klassifikacii [The Impact of the Invariants Implicit Learning on the
Effectiveness of Classification]. Peterburgskij psihologicheskij
zhurnal=St. Petersburg Psychological Journal, 2018, no 24, pp.
26—39. (In Russ.).
- Ivanchej I.I. Teorii implicitnogo nauchenija: protivorechivye podhody k
odnomu fenomenu ili neprotivorechivye opisanija raznyh? [Theories of Implicit
Learning: Contradictory Approaches to the Same Phenomenon or Consistent
Descriptions of Different Types of Learning?]. Rossijskij zhurnal
kognitivnoj nauki=The Russian Journal of Cognitive Science, 2014,
Vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 4—30. Available at: http://www.
cogjournal.ru/1/4/pdf/IvancheiRJCS2014.pdf (Accessed 10.10.2019). (In
Russ.).
- Ljashevskaja O.N., Sharov S.A. Chastotnyj slovar’ sovremennogo russkogo
jazyka (na materialah Nacional’nogo korpusa russkogo jazyka) [Russian language
frequency dictionary (based on the materials of the National corpus of the
Russian language)]. Moscow: Azbukovnik, 2009. 1087 p. (In Russ.).
- Medyncev A.A. Vlijanie implicitnoj podskazki na avtomaticheskie processy
obrabotki informacii v zadache na reshenie anagramm [The influence of implicit
cue on information processing in anagram solving task]. Eksperimental’naja
psihologija=Experimental Psychology, 2017. Vol. 10, no. 1, pp.
23—37. DOI:10.17759/exppsy.2017100103. (In Russ.).
- Moroshkina N.V. Vlijanie konflikta implicitnyh i jeksplicitnyh znanij
subekta na rezul’taty nauchenija v zadache klassifikacii [Influence of the
Conflict of Iimplicit and Explicit Knowledge of a Subject on the Results of
Learning Process in Classification Task] Eksperimental’naja
psihologija=Experimental Psychology, 2013, no 3, pp. 62—73. (In
Russ.).
- Moroshkina N.V., Gershkovich V.A. Aktual’nye tendencii v issledovanii
implicitnogo nauchenija [Current Tendencies in Implicit Learning Studies].
Vestnik SPbGU=Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Serija 16:
Psihologija. Pedagogika, 2014, no 4, pp. 14—24. (In Russ.).
- Puzyrev A.V. Anagrammy kak javlenie jazyka: Opyt sistemnogo osmyslenija
[Anagrams as a Phenomenon of Language: the Experience of System Understanding].
Moscow; Penza: In-t jazykoznanija RAN, PGPU im. V.G. Belinskogo, 1995. 378 p.
(In Russ.).
- Utochkin I.S., Jurevich M.A., Bulatova M.E. Zritel’naja rabochaja pamjat’:
metody, issledovanija, teorii [Visual Working Memory: Methods, Research,
Theory]. Rossijskij zhurnal kognitivnoj nauki=The Russian Journal of
Cognitive Science, 2016, Vol. 3, no 3, pp. 58—76. Available at:
http://www.cogjournal.ru/3/3/ pdf/UtochkinYurevichBulatovaRJCS2016.pdf
(Accessed 10.10.2019). (In Russ.).
- Baddeley A. The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory.
Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2000. Vol. 4 (11), pp. 417—423.
DOI:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01538-2
- Baddeley A.D., Hitch G. Working memory. Psychology of Learning
and Motivation, 1974. Vol. 8, pp. 47— 89.
DOI:10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60452-1
- Bright J.E.H., Burton A.M. Past midnight: Semantic processing in an
implicit learning task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,
1994. Vol. 47A, pp. 71—89. DOI:10.1080/14640749408401144
- Cleeremans A. Connecting Conscious and Unconscious Processing.
Cognitive Science, 2014. Рp. 1—30. DOI:10.1111/cogs.12149
- Cock, J.J., Berry, D.C., Gaffan, E.A. New strings for old: The role
of similarity processing in an incidental learning task. Quarterly Journal
of Experimental Psychology, 1994. Vol. 47A, pp. 1015—1034.
DOI:10.1080/14640749408401105
- Jacoby L.L., Dallas M. On the relationship between autobiographical
memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Pyschology:
General, 1981. Vol. 110 (3), pp. 306—340.
DOI:10.1037/0096-3445.110.3.306
- Kaplan I. T., Schoenfeld W. N. Oculomotor patterns during the solution of
visually displayed anagrams // Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1966.
Vol. 72(3). P. 447—451. DOI:10.1037/h0023632
- Kelly S.W., Wilkin K. A dual-process account of digit invariance
learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2006. Vol. 59,
pp. 1664-1680. DOI:10.1080/17470210500303839
- Lewicki P. Processing information about covariations that cannot be
articulated. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and
Cognition, 1986. Vol. 12 (l), pp. 135—146. DOI:10.1037/0278-
7393.12.1.135
- Luchins A.S. Mechanization in problem solving: The effect of
Einstellung. Psychological Monographs, 1942. Vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 1—95.
DOI:10.1037/h0093502
- Luchins A.S., Luchins E.H. New experimental attempts at preventing
mechanisation in problem solving. Journal of General Psychology, 1950.
Vol. 42, pp. 279—297. DOI:10.1080/00221309.1950.9920160
- Massing M., Blandin Y., Panzer S. (2016). Magnifying visual target
information and the role of eye movements in motor sequence learning // Acta
Psychologica. 2016. Vol. 163, pp. 59—64. DOI:10.1016/j. actpsy.2015.11.004
- McGeorge P., Burton A.M. Semantic processing in an incidental learning
task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1990. Vol. 42A,
pp. 597—609. DOI:10.1080/14640749008401239
- Newell B.R., Bright J.E.H. Evidence against hyperspeci-city in
implicit invariance learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental
Psychology, 2002. Vol.55A, pp. 1109—1126.
DOI:10.1080/02724980244000062
- Newell B.R., Bright J.E.H. Well past midnight: Calling time on
implicit invariant learning? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,
2002. Vol.14(2), pp. 185—205. DOI:10.1080/09541440143000023
- Öllinger M., Jones G., Knoblich G. Investigating the Effect of Mental Set
on Insight Problem Solving // Experimental Psychology, 2008. Vol. 55(4),
pp. 269—282. DOI:10.1027/1618-3169.55.4.269
- Perruchet P., Pacteau C. Synthetic grammar learning: Implicit rule
abstraction or explicit fragmentary knowledge? Journal of Experimental
Psychology: General, 1990. Vol. 119 (3), pp. 264—275.
DOI:10.1037/0096-3445.119.3.264
- Remillard G. Pure perceptual-based sequence learning // Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 2003. Vol. 29(4). P.
581—597. DOI:10.1037/0278-7393.29.4.581
- Sanderson P. Verbal knowledge and skilled task performance:
Association, dissociation and mental models. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 1989. Vol. 15 (4), pp. 729—
747. DOI:10.1037/0278-7393.15.4.729
- Shanks D.R., John M.F.St. Characteristics of dissociable human learning
systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1994. No. 17, pp. 367—447.
DOI:10.1017/S0140525X00035032
|
|
