Russian Psychological Issues PsyJournals.ru
OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS
JournalsTopicsAuthorsEditor's Choice Manuscript SubmissionAbout PsyJournals.ruContact Us
Experimental Psychology (Russia) - №3 / 2021 | Перейти к описанию
Web of Science СС

  Previous issue (2021. Vol. 14, no. 2)

CrossRef

Experimental Psychology (Russia)

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

ISSN (printed version): 2072-7593

ISSN (online): 2311-7036

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published since 2008

Published quarterly

Free of fees
Open Access Journal

 

Longitudinal Study on the Development of Giftedness 83

|

Bogoyavlenskaya D.B.
Doctor of Psychology, Chief Researcher, Creativity Diagnostic Team Leader, Laboratory of Giftedness, Psychological Institute of Russian Academy of Education, Moscow, Russia
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6766-2047
e-mail: Mpo-120@mail.ru

Artemenkov S.L.
PhD in Engineering, Professor of the Department of Applied Informatics and Multimedia Technologies, Head of the Center of Information Technologies for Psychological Research of the Faculty of Information Technologies, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1619-2209
e-mail: slart@inbox.ru

Joukova E.S.
PhD in Psychology, Senior Researcher, FEDERAL State Budgetary Scientific Institution «Psychological Institute of RAO», Moscow, Russia
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7546-908X
e-mail: JoukovaEC@yandex.ru

Abstract
The article is devoted to the study of giftedness as the ability to create. The relevance of the topic is determined by the state program for the identification and support of gifted children. A longitudinal study of children aged 8—12 years (n = 42) using the “Creative Field” method allows us to trace the formation and development of their giftedness. This method allows for a differentiated diagnosis of the ability to develop activities on their own initiative (heuristic level of activity) or its absence (stimulus-productive level of activity). Intelligence was assessed by J. Raven’s test and the indicators of learning ability of the “Creative Field” method. In connection with the widespread understanding of giftedness, which reduces it to a high level of intelligence, a hypothesis was put forward about the range of IQ indices, which may be wider in the stimulus-productive group than in the group of heurists, but its upper bounds for these groups should be close. High values of intelligence in both groups are the basis for the conclusion that it is impossible to reduce giftedness only to a high level of intelligence. Giftedness is manifested in the integration of intelligence, the lower limit of which is determined by the ability to master the proposed activity, with the dominant cognitive motivation in the personality structure.

Keywords: giftedness, creativity, intelligence, motive, development, longitudinal research, primary school age, adolescence, statistical analysis, R.

Column: Psychology of Abilities

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2021140309

For Reference

References
  1. Artemenkov S.L. Setevoe modelirovanie psihologicheskih konstruktov. Modelirovanie i analiz dannyh. 2017, no. 1, pp. 9—28. (In Russ.).
  2. Artemenkov S.L. Inicionno-semanticheskaja model’ divergentnoj kreativnosti [Jelektronnyj resurs]. Psihologicheskaja nauka i obrazovanie psyedu.ru. 2012, no. 3, pp. 1—15. URL: http://psyjournals.ru/psyedu_ ru/2012/n3/55540.shtml (In Russ.).
  3. Bogoyavlenskaya D.B. Filosofskiye osnovy teorii odarennosti // Kulturno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya — MGPPU. 2019. T. 15. № 2. s. 14—21. (In Russ.).
  4. Bogoyavlenskaya D.B., Bogoyavlenskaya M.E. Odarennost: priroda i diagnostika ( Monografiya) / M.: ANO «CNPRO». 2013. 208 s. (In Russ.).
  5. Bogoyavlenskaya D.B. Metod issledovanija i identifikacii tvorcheskih sposobnostej. Sovremennaja jeksperimental’naja psihologija. Pod red. V.A. Barabanshhikova. V 2-h t. Moscow: Izd-vo Institut psihologii RAN, 2011. pp. 361—373. (In Russ.).
  6. Bogoyavlenskaya M.E., Goryacheva T.G. Neyropsikhologicheskiye aspekty razvitiya odarennosti v detstve /M.E. Bogoyavlenskaya, T.G. Goryacheva // Deti. Obshchestvo.Budushcheye: sbornik nauchnykh statey po materialam III Kongressa «Psikhicheskoye zdorov’ye cheloveka XXI veka» : sbornik statey. T. 2. Moskva: KNORUS, 2020. S. 18. DOI: 10.37752/9785406029398-3 (In Russ.).
  7. Vygotskiy L.S. Myshleniye i rech. M.: Natsionalnoye obrazovaniye. 2016. 368 s. (In Russ.).
  8. Gilford Dzh. Tri storony intellekta // Psikhologiya myshleniya / Sbornik perevodov pod red. A.M. Matjushkina. M.: Progress, M.: 1965. 433 s. (In Russ.).
  9. Druzhinin V.N. Psikhologiya obshchikh sposobnostey. Moskva: Laterna. Vita. 1995. 150 s. (In Russ.).
  10. Zhukova E.S., Artemenkov S.L., Bogoyavlenskaya D.B. Issledovanie intellektual’noj aktivnosti v mladshem shkol’nom i podrostkovom vozraste. Modelirovanie i analiz dannyh. 2019, no. 1, pp. 11—29. (In Russ.).
  11. Zhukova E.S., Bogoyavlenskaya D.B. Vozmozhnosti i ogranicheniya sovremennykh metodov diagnostiki odarennosti // Psikhologiya obrazovaniya: Pedagog-psikholog v mire shkoly / Materialy XIII Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. M.: Obshherossijskaja obshhestvennaja organizacija «Federacija psihologov obrazovanija Rossii», 2017. S. 50—53. (In Russ.).
  12. Ivleva M.L. Filosofskiye osnovy psikhologicheskoy kontseptsii odarennosti. Uchebnoye posobiye M.: MGTU «MAMI». 2011. 256 s. (In Russ.).
  13. Meyker K.Dzh. Proyekt «Diskaver»: integriruya kreativnost. intellekt i resheniye problem // Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki. 2005. T. 2. № 4. S. 104—112. (In Russ.).
  14. Melik-Pashayev A.A. Dominanta i tvorchestvo // Voprosy psikhologii. 2020, № 3, S. 80—91. (In Russ.).
  15. Pirlik G.P. Vozrastnaya psikhologiya: razvitiye rebenka v deyatel’nosti [Elektronnyi resurs]: Uchebnoye posobiye / G. P. Pirlik, A. M. Fedoseyeva; FGBOU VO «Moskovskiy pedagogicheskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet». Moskva: MPGU, 2020. 370 s. http://elib.mpgu.info/view.php?fDocumentId=35978 (In Russ.).
  16. Proyekt Avrora: kompleksnaya diagnostika detskoy odarennosti / S.A. Kornilov. M. Tan. D.D. Khimenko. E.S. Frolova. M.G. Mokrinskiy. R.Dzh. Sternberg. E.L. Grigorenko // Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki. 2009. T. 6. № 3. S.117—125. (In Russ.).
  17. Rabochaya kontseptsiya odarennosti MO RF. FTsP «Odarennyye deti» / otvetstvennyy redactor D.B. Bogoyavlenskaya. nauchnyy redaktor V.D. Shadrikov. M.: MO RF Federal’naja celevaja programma «Odarennye deti» 2003. 96 s. (In Russ.).
  18. Raven J.K., Raven J., Kurt D. Rukovodstvo k Progressivnym matricam Ravena i Slovarnym shkalam. Razdel 1. Obshhaja chast’ rukovodstva. Moscow: Kogito-centr, 1997. 77 p. (In Russ.).
  19. Trifonova E.V. Spetsifika proyavleniy odarennosti v doshkol’nom vozraste. // Aktual’nyye problemy kul’turno-istoricheskoy psikhologii: materialy Pervogo mezhdunarodnogo simpoziuma po kul’turno- istoricheskoy psikhologii (Novosibirsk, 17—19 noyabrya 2020 g.). Novosibirsk: Izd-vo NGPU, 2020. 478—485. (In Russ.).
  20. Ushakov D.V. Psikhologiya intellekta i odarennosti. IP RAN. 2011. 464. s. (In Russ.).
  21. Khazratova N.V. Formirovaniye kreativnosti pod vliyaniyem mikrosredy: Avtoref. dissertatsii kandidata psikhologicheskikh nauk. 19.00.01. Moskva. 1994. 169 s. (In Russ.).
  22. Kholodnaya M.A. Ponyatiynyye sposobnosti kak bazovyy komponent intellektualnoy odarennosti. Materialy Vserossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii. Yaroslavl. RFFI. 2019. S. 12—14. (In Russ.).
  23. Shadrikov V.D. Sposobnosti i odarennost cheloveka. Moskva: IP RAN. 2019. 274 s. (In Russ.).
  24. Elkonin D.B. Izbrannye psihologicheskie trudy. Moscow: Pedagogika, 1989. 560 s. (In Russ.).
  25. Bogoyavlenskaya D., Joukova E., Artemenkov S. Longitudinal Study Of The Creative Abilities // The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences (EpSBS), 2018. V. 49 — ICPE 2018. 125—131. doi: 10.15405/epsbs.2018.11.02.14.
  26. Sternberg R.J., Ambrose D. (Eds.) Conceptions of Giftedness and Talent. Palgrave Macmillan, 2020. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-56869-6
  27. Epskamp S., Fried E.I. A tutorial on regularized partial correlation networks. Psychological Methods, 2018. 23(4), 617—634. doi: 10.1037/met0000167.
  28. Lo C. O., Porath M., Yu H.P., Chen C.M., Tsai K.F., & Wu I.C. Giftedness in the Making: A Transactional Perspective. Gifted Child Quarterly, 2019. 63(3), 172—184. doi: 10.1177/0016986218812474
  29. Pérez J., Aperribai L., Cortabarría L., Borges, A. Examining the Most and Least Changeable Elements of the Social Representation of Giftedness. Sustainability 2020, 12(13), p. 5361. doi: 10.3390/su12135361
  30. Renzulli̇ J. Promoting Social Capital by Expanding the Conception of Giftedness. Talent, 2020. 10 (1), 2—20. doi: 10.46893/talent.757477
  31. Schmitt, A.J., Piselli, K., Hoffman, R.L., Schreiber J.B. Factor Analysis of a Modified Characteristic of Giftedness Scale. Contemporary School Psychology, 2019. doi: 10.1007/s40688-019-00268-7
  32. Sternberg R.J. Transformational Giftedness: Rethinking Our Paradigm for Gifted Education. Roeper Review, 2020. 42(4), 230—240. doi: 10.1080/02783193.2020.1815266
 
About PsyJournals.ru

© 2007–2021 Portal of Russian Psychological Publications. All rights reserved

PsyJournals.ru in Russian

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Catalogue of academic journals in psychology & education MSUPE

Creative Commons License Open Access Repository     Webometrics Ranking of Repositories

RSS Psyjournals at facebook Psyjournals at Twitter Psyjournals at Youtube ??????.???????