|
|
Adaptation of “Sociotropy—Self-Sufficience” Questionnaire for Russian Sample on Middle Adults and Ageing People 77
Strizhitskaya O.Y.
Doctor of Psychology, Professor, Saint-Petersburg State University, St.Petersburg, Russia
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7141-162X
e-mail: o.strizhitskaya@spbu.ru Petrash M.D.
PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor, Saint Petersburg State University, St.Petersburg, Russia
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4542-7289
e-mail: m.petrash@spbu.ru Murtazina I.R.
PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor, Saint Petersburg State University, St.Petersburg, Russia
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2204-4376
e-mail: i.r.myrtazina@spbu.ru Vartanyan G.A.
PhD in Psychology, Research Fellow, Saint Petersburg State University, St.Petersburg, Russia
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6266-4713
e-mail: g.vartanyan@spbu.ru
Present paper describes that adaptation of a questionnaire on the sociotropy or own assumptions and goals. Paper presents the results of the psychometric validity of the Russian adaptation of the Questionnaire for middle and older adults. Participants were adults aged 35-75 (N=358; M= 49,27; SD = 11,08; 75,5 % — females). Our adaptation was based on a New Zealand version of the “Socitropy/ Autonomy scale” by A. Beck. To check the criterial validity we used “Differential questionnaire of loneliness experiences”, “Social and emotional loneliness scales for middle and older adults”, “Psychological well-being scale by C. Ryff”. The results of the exploratory and confirmatory analysis identified four subscales: “Social non-confidence”, “Dependence on other’s opinion”, “Affiliation” and “Independence”. Psychometric tests proved that all identified scales had internal consistency, and form a general factor. Final confirmatory analysis showed that four scales are comparatively independent. Analysis of the results in age and sex groups showed that the questionnaire maintained its consistency in age groups (middle adulthood, later adulthood, aging) as well as for males and females. Thus, our results revealed that our adaptation could be used on adults and older adults in Russia.
Keywords: sociotropy, self-sufficiency, autonomy, dependency from communication, questionnaire adaptation.
Column: Psychodiagnostics
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2021140315
Funding. The reported study was funded by Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR), project number 19-513-18015.
- Alexandrova N.H. Sub”ektnost’ na pozdnih etapah ontogeneza [Subjectivity
during later life]. Nizhnij Novgorod: Nizhegorodskij gumanitarnyj centr. 2000.
125 s. (In Russ.).
- Babakova L.V. Vzaimosvyaz’ mezhdu povsednevnymmi nepriyatnostyami,
lichnostymi chertami i udovletvorennost’yu zhizn’yu u pozhilyh lyudej v
Bolgarii [Associations between daily hassles, personality traits and life
satisfaction in later life in Bulgaria]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo
universiteta. Seriya 16. Psihologiya Pedagogika, 2015. № 4. s.153—162. (In
Russ.).
- ZHukovskaya L.V., Troshihina E.G. SHkala psihologicheskogo blagopoluchiya
K. Riff [Scale of Psychological well-being by C. Ryff]. Psihologicheskij
zhurnal, 2011. T. 32. № 2. S. 82—93. (In Russ.).
- Nartova-Bochaver S.K. Svyaz’ psihologicheskoj suverennosti i social’nyh
verovanij: granicy lichnosti v kontekste «bol’shogo» sociuma [Connection
between the psychological sovereignty and social beliefs: personal boundaries
in the social world]. Social’naya psihologiya i obshchestvo. 2017. T. 8. № 3.
S. 100—114. doi:10.17759/sps.2017080308 (In Russ.).
- Osin E.N., Leont’ev D.A. Differencial’nyj oprosnik perezhivaniya
odinochestva: struktura i svojstva [Differential questionnaire of loneliness
experience: structure and characteristics][Elektronnyj resurs]. Psihologiya.
ZHurnal Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki, 2013. T. 10. № 1. S. 55—81.
https://psy-journal.hse.ru/
data/2013/10/31/1283223356/Osin_Leontiev_10-01pp55-81.pdf (Accessed:
10.06.2019). (In Russ.).
- Psihologicheskaya zrelost’ lichnosti [Psychological personality maturity]/
Pod red. L.A. Golovej. SPb.: Skifiya-print. 2014. 240 s. (In Russ.).
- Rasskazova E.I. Psihologicheskaya samoregulyaciya kak faktor
uspeshnosti upravleniya povedeniem v razlichnyh sferah
funkcionirovaniya lichnosti [Psychological self-regulation as factor of success
in the management of own behavior in different life domains].
Eksperimental’naya psihologiya. 2019. T. 12. №. 3. S. 148—163.
doi:10.17759/exppsy.2019120312 doi:10.17759/sps.2017080308 (In Russ.).
- Strizhickaya O.YU., Petrash M.D., Murtazina I.R., Vartanyan G.A., Manevskij
F.S., Aleksandrova N.H., Babakova L.V. Adaptaciya bolgarskoj versii shkaly
social’nogo i emocional’nogo odinochestva (SELSA-S) dlya vzroslyh i pozhilyh
lyudej [Adaptation of the Bulgarian Version of the Social and Emotional
Loneliness Scale (Short Form) for Adults and Older Adults]. Konsul’tativnaya
psihologiya i psihoterapiya. 2020. T. 28. No 4. S. 79—97. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2020280405 (In Russ.).
- Akgün B.M., Hiçdurmaz D., Öz F. The investigation of learned
resourcefulness in terms of locus of control, sociotropy-autonomy personality
traits, and demographic and professional variables in nurses. Journal of
Psychiatric Nursing / Psikiyatri Hemsireleri Dernegi, 2019. Vol. 10. № 3. P.
155—164. DOI: 10.14744/phd.2019.21549
- Bieling P.J., Beck A.T., Brown G.K. The Sociotropy—Autonomy Scale:
Structure and Implications. Cognitive Therapy & Research, 2000. Vol. 24. №
6. P. 763—780. DOI: 10.1023/A:1005599714224.
- Cappeliez P. The relationship between sociotropy and autonomy and the five
factor model of personality. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1993. Vol.
32. № 1. P. 78—80. doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1993. tb01030.x
- Carstensen L.L., Fung H.H., Charles S.T.
Socioemotional Selectivity Theory and the
Regulation of Emotion in the Second Half of Life. Motivation & Emotion,
2003. Vol. 27. № 2. P. 103—123. doi. org/10.1023/A:1024569803230.
- Connor-Smith J., Compas B.E. Vulnerability to Social Stress: Coping as a
Mediator or Moderator of Sociotropy and Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression.
Cognitive Therapy and Research, 2002. Vol. 26. № 1. P. 39—55.
DOI:10.1023/A:1013889504101.
- Craven J.M. Sociotropy and Autonomy in Older Adults and the Relationships
between the Personality Styles, Social Support, and Affect. // A thesis
presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor
of Philosophy in Psychology at Massey University. 2007. Palmerston North. 232
p.
- Dasch K.B., Cohen L.H., Sahl J.C., Gunthert K.C. Moderating Effects of
Sociotropy and Autonomy on Affective and Self-esteem Reactivity to Daily
Stressors. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 2008. Vol. 32. № 2. p. 177—195.
doi.org/10.1007/s10608-007-9126-1.
- Husky M.M., Grondin O.S., Compagnone P.D. Validation de la version
française du questionnaire de Sociotropie-Autonomie de Beck et collègues.
Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 2004. Vol. 49. № 12. P. 851— 858.
DOI:10.1177/070674370404901209.
- Mackenzie C.S., Karaoylas E.C., Starzyk K.B. Lifespan Differences in a Self
Determination Theory Model of Eudaimonia: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Younger,
Middle-Aged, and Older Adults. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2018. Vol. 19. №
8. P. 2465—2487. doi.org/10.1007/s10902-017-9932-4
- Otani K., Suzuki A., Matsumoto Y., Shirata T. Marked differences in core
beliefs about self and others, between sociotropy and autonomy: personality
vulnerabilities in the cognitive model of depression. Neuropsychiatric Disease
& Treatment, 2018. Vol. 14. P. 863—866. doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S161541.
- Şahin N., Ulusoy M., Şahin N. Exploring the sociotropy-autonomy dimensions
in a sample of Turkish psychiatric inpatients. Journal of Clinical Psychology,
2003. Vol. 59. № 10. P. 1055—1068. DOI: 10.1002/1097-4679.
- Sato T. Sociotropy and Autonomy: The Nature of Vulnerability. Journal of
Psychology, 2003. Vol. 137. № 5. P. 447—466.
doi.org/10.1080/00223980309600627.
- Sato T., McCann, D. Sociotropy—autonomy and the Beck Depression Inventory.
European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 2000. Vol. 16. № 1. P. 66—76.
DOI: 10.1027//1015-5759.16.1.66
- Toro Tobar R.A., Vargas Rubio C.V. Escala De Sociotropía-Autonomía (Sas):
Propiedades Psicométricas De La Adaptación a Colombia. Psicogente, 2014. Vol.
13. № 2. P. 323—336.
- Yang K., Girgus J.S. Are Women More Likely than Men Are to Care Excessively
about Maintaining Positive Social Relationships? A Meta-Analytic Review of the
Gender Difference in Sociotropy. Sex Roles, 2019. Vol. 81. № 3/4. P. 157—172.
DOI: 10.1007/s11199-018-0980-y
|
|
