Russian Psychological Issues PsyJournals.ru
OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS
JournalsTopicsAuthorsEditor's Choice For AuthorsAbout PsyJournals.ruContact Us

  Previous issue (2019. Vol. 8, no. 4)

Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

ISSN (online): 2304-4977

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Started in 2012

Published quarterly

Free of fees
Open Access Journal

 

Road safety: Research from developmental psychology perspectives 938

Archakova T.O.
psychologist, charity foundation "Volunteers to help orphans", Moscow, Russia
e-mail: archakova@hotbox.ru

Abstract
The article outlines the main trajectories of research connecting the fields of traffic and developmental psychology. It describes foundations of the development of core pedestrians' skills, such as road-crossing and route choice, in children and emphasized unique parental contribution to the development of these skills. It analyzes the reasons for risky behavior of adolescent pedestrians and drivers: age-specific cognitive processes of risk assessment and peer pressure. The risk of road accidents is proved to be unequal for different groups of children and adolescents: the significant factors include gender (boys and young men are much more frequently involved in road accidents) and family social status (low socioeconomic status correlates with higher risk). This review can be used for preventive work with children and adolescents as the most vulnerable group of road and transportation users

Keywords: road safety, road accidents, children, adolescents, child-parent relationships

Column: Special (branch) psychology

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2017060104

For Reference

References
  1. Pokazateli sostoyaniya bezopasnosti dorozhnogo dvizheniya [Elektronnyi resurs]: Uvazhenie. Professionalizm. Bezopasnost' [Indicators of road safety]. Available at: http://stat.gibdd.ru (Accessed 09.02.2017).
  2. Ampofo-Boateng K., Thomson J.A. Children’s perception of safety and danger on the road. British Journal of Psychology, 1991. Vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 487–505. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1991.tb02415.x
  3. Baird A.A., Fugelsang J.A. The emergence of consequential thought: Evidence from neuroscience. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 2004. Vol. 359, no. 1451, pp. 1797–1804. doi:10.1098/rstb.2004.1549
  4. Thomson J.A. et al. Child development and the aims of road safety education [Elektronnyi resurs]: Road safety research report, no. 1. London: HMSO, 1996. 73 p. Available at: http://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/18694 (Accessed: 09.02.2017).
  5. Clarke D.D., Ward P., Truman W. Voluntary risk taking and skill deficits in young driver accidents in the UK. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2005. Vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 523–529. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2005.01.007
  6. Endsley M.R. Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 1995. Vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 32–64.
  7. Henretig F.M. et al. Grandparents driving grandchildren: An evaluation of child passenger safety and injuries. Pediatrics, 2011. Vol. 128, no. 2, pp. 289–295. doi:10.1542/peds.2011-0046
  8. Guassi Moreira J.F., Telzer E.H. Mother still knows best: Maternal influence uniquely modulates adolescent reward sensitivity during risk taking. Developmental Science, 2016. doi:10.1111/desc.12484
  9. Hill R., Lewis V., Dunbar G. Young children’s concepts of danger. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 2000. Vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 103–120. doi:10.1348/026151000165607
  10. Mc Mahon K. Keeping children safe in traffic. Paris: OECD, 2004.
  11. Meir A., Parmet Y., Oron-Gilad T. Towards understanding child-pedestrians’ hazard perception abilities in a mixed reality dynamic environment. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2013. Vol. 20, pp. 90–107. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2013.05.004
  12. Muir C. et al. Parents as role models in road safety [Elektronnyi resurs]. Clayton Campus: Monash University, Accident Research Centre, 2010. 77 p. Available at: http://www.monash.edu/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/216958/muarc302.pdf (Accessed 09.02.2017).
  13. Tolmie A. et al. Problems of attention and visual search in the context of child pedestrian behavior. London: Department of Transport, Environment &The Regions, 1998. Road safety research report no. 10.
  14. Puckering С. Parenting in Social and Economic Adversity // Handbook of Parenting: Theory and Research for Practice. M. Hoghughi, N. Long. London: SAGE, 2004. P. 38–54. doi: 10.4135/9781848608160.n3
  15. Underwood J. et al. Reading the road: The influence of age and sex on child pedestrians’ perceptions of road risk. British Journal of Psychology, 2007. Vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 93–110. doi:10.1348/000712606X104409
  16. Reyna V. F., Farley F. Risk and rationality in adolescent decision making: Implications for theory, practice, and public policy. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2006. Vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–44.
  17. Reyna V.F. How people make decisions that involve risk. A dual-processes approach. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2004. Vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 60–66. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00275.x
  18. Schioldborg P. Children, traffic and traffic training: analysis of the Children's Traffic Club. The Voice of the Pedestrian, 1976, no. 6, pp. 12–19.
  19. Schwebel D.C., McClure L.A. Children’s pedestrian route selection: Efficacy of a video and internet training protocol. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2014. Vol. 26. Part A. P. 171–179. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2014.07.005
  20. Shope J.T., Raghunathan T.E., Patil S.M. Examining trajectories of adolescent risk factors as predictors of subsequent high-risk driving behavior. Journal of Adolescent Health, 2003. Vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 214–224. doi:10.1016/S1054-139X(02)00424-X
  21. Simons-Morton B.G., Quimet M.C., Catalano R.F. Parenting and the young driver problem. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2008. Vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 294–303. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2008.06.018
  22. Smorti M., Guarnieri S., Ingoglia S. The parental bond, resistance to peer influence, and risky driving in adolescence. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2014. Vol. 22, pp. 184–195. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2013.12.001
  23. Starkey N.J., Isler R.B. The role of executive function, personality and attitudes to risks in explaining self-reported driving behaviour in adolescent and adult male drivers. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2016. Vol. 38, pp. 127–136. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2016.01.013
  24. Christie N. et al. Understanding high traffic injury risks for children in low socioeconomic areas: a qualitative study of parents’ views. Injury Prevention, 2007. Vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 394-397. doi:10.1136/ip.2007.016659
  25. Taubman-Ben-Ari O. et al. When grandparents drive their grandchildren. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2016. Vol. 39, pp. 54–64. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2016.03.004
  26. Whitebread D., Neilson K. The contribution of visual search strategies to the development of pedestrian skills by 4–11 year-old children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2000. Vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 539–557. doi:10.1348/000709900158290
  27. Youths and Road Safety [Электронный ресурс]. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2007. 47 p. Available at: http://www.who.int/management/programme/ncd/Youth%20and%20Road%20Safety.pdf (Accessed 09.02.2017).
comments powered by Disqus
 
About PsyJournals.ru

© 2007–2020 Portal of Russian Psychological Publications. All rights reserved

PsyJournals.ru in Russian

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Catalogue of academic journals in psychology & education MSUPE

Creative Commons License

RSS Psyjournals at facebook Psyjournals at Twitter Psyjournals at Youtube ??????.???????